What's new

Does Chinese blood really lack the DNA for aggression?

There are aggressive Chinese and not so aggressive chinese.It depends on which region you are talking about.People who live in Northeastern provinces and inner mongolia are the most aggressive ones.Even Uyghur turks don't dare to fight with them.People who live in southern provinces are not so aggressive(not aggressive at all maybe).

Stop eating tofu. Tofu turn men into girlie men due to high amounts of estrogen in soy.
 
.
My hunch is, there is no need for China to be aggressive. In ancient times, this is absolutely correct. Most surrounding countries are not suitable for people to live.

So we keep this habit till now.
 
Last edited:
.
My hunch is, there is no need for China to be aggressive. In ancient times, this is absolutely correct. Most surround countries are not suitable for people to live.

So we keep this habit till now.

I think to remain firm but cool-headed is the right strategy. Firmness ensures China has the required material capability to fend off the poetnially agressive. Cool-headedness ensures that China would not show off its muscle at every instance, but rather, keep it low-profile and sort of "unpredictable." This may ensures the friend of your strong personality, and the enemy, of your potential power to punish if the situation requires so.

@Lux de Veritas , your gruesome picture proves nothing. That sort of hysteria may be seen anywhere and is indicative of nothing. You are one unstable soul.
 
.
East Asians (Chinese, Japanese, Koreans) don't tend to be aggressive. I could be wrong because that is what i concluded from my own personal experience, others might differ.
 
.
I think to remain firm but cool-headed is the right strategy. Firmness ensures China has the required material capability to fend off the poetnially agressive. Cool-headedness ensures that China would not show off its muscle at every instance, but rather, keep it low-profile and sort of "unpredictable." This may ensures the friend of your strong personality, and the enemy, of your potential power to punish if the situation requires so.

@Lux de Veritas , your gruesome picture proves nothing. That sort of hysteria may be seen anywhere and is indicative of nothing. You are one unstable soul.

Yes, modest it the best policy, this is part of our culture.
 
. .
. . . .
.
Expansion is not in the Chinese DNA", Premier Li Keqiang declared during his visit to Britain, apparently in an attempt to allay fears driven by China's territorial claims in the South China Sea, "nor can we accept the logic that a strong country is bound to become hegemonic."

He was echoing comments by Xi Jinping the previous month when the president asserted: "In Chinese blood, there is no DNA for aggression or hegemony." China has moved to the centre of the world stage but has yet to truly lead, partly because of apprehension about its intentions, despite deep-seated problems dogging the United States.
We can only only hope that Premier Li and President Xi were being rhetorical and not scientific, because if they try to use science to explain Chinese 'blood', science is going to bite them in their bums.

Are they saying the gene associated with aggression is not in Chinese DNA ?

https://news.brown.edu/articles/2009/01/hotsauce
Monoamine oxidase A is an enzyme that breaks down important neurotransmitters in the brain, including dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin. The enzyme is regulated by monoamine oxidase A gene (MAOA). Humans have various forms of the gene, resulting in different levels of enzymatic activity. People with the low-activity form (MAOA-L) produce less of the enzyme, while the high-activity form (MAOA-H) produces more of the enzyme.

Several studies have found a correlation between the low-activity form of MAOA and aggression in observational and survey-based studies. Only about a third of people in Western populations have the low-activity form of MAOA. By comparison, low-activity MAOA has been reported to be much more frequent (approaching two-thirds of people) in some populations that had a history of warfare. This led to a controversy over MAOA being dubbed the “warrior gene.”

Association study on tardive dyskinesia and ... [Psychiatr Genet. 2013] - PubMed - NCBI
Association study on tardive dyskinesia and polymorphisms in COMT and MAOA in Chinese population.
China's history is no different than that of the Europeans -- containing periods of warfare. It is irrelevant if those wars were internal to Chinese land and among Chinese. The fact of the matter is that some Chinese felt a need to violently subjugate some other Chinese for some reasons and wars resulted.

Why was there a need for all Chinese to be under one ruler any way ? What is wrong with several Chinese kingdoms or countries ? If aggression is not in the Chinese DNA, then what is the (Kung Pao) beef with Taiwan ? Why not just leave the islanders alone ?

These questions are not meant to be answered but to point out the absurdity of what these Chinese leaders said and IF they were trying to bring science to their side, and if any Chinese members here pick up this line of belief, then you guys are truly as stupid as the argument goes.
 
.
We can only only hope that Premier Li and President Xi were being rhetorical and not scientific, because if they try to use science to explain Chinese 'blood', science is going to bite them in their bums.

Are they saying the gene associated with aggression is not in Chinese DNA ?

https://news.brown.edu/articles/2009/01/hotsauce


Association study on tardive dyskinesia and ... [Psychiatr Genet. 2013] - PubMed - NCBI

China's history is no different than that of the Europeans -- containing periods of warfare. It is irrelevant if those wars were internal to Chinese land and among Chinese. The fact of the matter is that some Chinese felt a need to violently subjugate some other Chinese for some reasons and wars resulted.

Why was there a need for all Chinese to be under one ruler any way ? What is wrong with several Chinese kingdoms or countries ? If aggression is not in the Chinese DNA, then what is the (Kung Pao) beef with Taiwan ? Why not just leave the islanders alone ?

These questions are not meant to be answered but to point out the absurdity of what these Chinese leaders said and IF they were trying to bring science to their side, and if any Chinese members here pick up this line of belief, then you guys are truly as stupid as the argument goes.

As inflexible as always old man.

Your grand kids would visit you more often if you stop being such a precise Hair splitting semantic arguing old man.

Of course the rhetoric is not in the literal sense.
 
.
As inflexible as always old man.

Your grand kids would visit you more often if you stop being such a precise Hair splitting semantic arguing old man.

Of course the rhetoric is not in the literal sense.
The pic about killing a person by many cuts kinda make you look silly.
 
.
As inflexible as always old man.

Your grand kids would visit you more often if you stop being such a precise Hair splitting semantic arguing old man.

Of course the rhetoric is not in the literal sense.

Why must you go into personal commentary? Can we just stick to subject matter, instead of personal attack(s). Please.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom