Do you want the military to takeover in Pakistan?

[Waffen SS]

This military can't do its intended job. They have failed miserably in all wars and insurgencies. Yet some naive members think that the miracle of military takeover will save the country.

FA pass generals have no capacity to govern. Security guards are not leadership material.

 

[Mugwop]

Some people would like to point out that military dictators are better than democracy. Whether its true or not can only be tested in Pakistan to see the results.

What do you think about Musharraf? Everything was good when he was in charge.

 

[Waffen SS]

It is good to see the military lovers in severe pain. It is a great sight to see the politicians rubbing salt into their wounds.

Hey army lovers, Plz use BURNOL.

 

[XenoEnsi-14]

I voted no, military takeover if used, should be only used as a last resort where all other options are not possible, it should also be limited to resetting the republic/democratic government. Also, IMO political parties have no place in a republic/democracy, they only lead to its eventual destruction.

 

[alimobin memon]

Damocrazy lost Bangladesh by ZAB, WHO WAS THE FRIST CIVILIAN MARSHALL LAW ADMINISTRATOR Of pakistan, was not added in this thread, which is basicly directed to paint Damocrazy is the only solution left in pakistan ?
but not the real democracy?
also, this thread is lacking the economic progress, done by the dictatorships if comparing to the Damocrazy?
Most to the , Pakistani politicians like nawaz sharif & Zulfiqar Ali bhutto, were the production of the dictatorships , & were key figures?
All I can say, is a kid, s wish to make pakistan as his fairy tale?

We lost Bangladesh because of military there is no doubt in it. if you are in favor of Military Government then I would Only say this , "Army looks good on borders".

I voted no, military takeover if used, should be only used as a last resort where all other options are not possible, it should also be limited to resetting the republic/democratic government. Also, IMO political parties have no place in a republic/democracy, they only lead to its eventual destruction.

Exactly Military is not Last resort. I dont favor Imran Khan but I think give him chance and if he fails I pray someone else with good vision arises but I would avoid a military rule.

 

[Waffen SS]

In 1944, everyone knew that Nazi Germany would lose the war by all means. Even in those darkest hours, the legendary military commander Field Marshall Manstein refused to take part in coup against Adolf Hitler.

His famous words, "Prussian Generals do not mutiny".

No Pakistani general can ever dream of coming close to what Manstein achieved in his career. If the greatest military mind of the post-Napoleonic era doesn't stage a coup against his political leadership while his country stood at the precipice of utter destruction; then, there can be no valid reason, whatsoever, for a military takeover in Pakistan.

We are way better than Germany of 1944.

 

[ranjeet]

LOL. You are saying each party can have their own military wing too?

Don't they already have one? sans the tanks and hawai taayare !!!

 

[batmannow]

We lost Bangladesh because of military there is no doubt in it. if you are in favor of Military Government then I would Only say this , "Army looks good on borders".


Exactly Military is not Last resort. I dont favor Imran Khan but I think give him chance and if he fails I pray someone else with good vision arises but I would avoid a military rule.

Yes sure good version person will arise can't save your country, while your army stays on the border, while politicians like BHUTTO chanting slogans like IDHAR HUM , UHAR TUM, in 1971 not, accepting his defeat by sheikh mu jee ur Rehaman?
You don't know about the history, so better keep praying?

What do you think about Musharraf? Everything was good when he was in charge.

Sure Comparc it from today, 1100 times better pakistan was?

 

[alimobin memon]

Yes sure good version person will arise can't save your country, while your army stays on the border, while politicians like BHUTTO chanting slogans like IDHAR HUM , UHAR TUM, in 1971 not, accepting his defeat by sheikh mu jee ur Rehaman?
You don't know about the history, so better keep praying?


Sure Comparc it from today, 1100 times better pakistan was?

I am

 

[Marshmallow]

He might be, but he can't pronounce himself as dictator.. That's the beauty of democracy.. There is element of fear somewhere deep inside..

that is why even an FIR hasnt been still launched against the CM of Punjab on Model Town Massacre when there are clear proofs open in Media and he wouldnt be tried in near future im sure till his elder brother or his party is ruling the country...while Mushy was dragged to courts on Lal Masjid case.....

Cant see the difference?

 

[Asian.Century]

Much better option then giving Punjab to Imran khan and have it divided into many parts.

 

[A1Kaid]

It is not the military's job to run the government.

 

[batmannow]

It is not the military's job to run the government.

a dam 10 year old kid knows that, but when govt is not able to run then what, break the country?

 

[A1Kaid]

a dam 10 year old kid knows that, but when govt is not able to run then what, break the country?

Government is running, you people just don't want the party in power to run. NS is democratically elected and should finish his term.

 

[PlanetWarrior]

When likes of @Arya Desa , @PlanetWarrior , & @Yogijaat are supporting imposition of Martial law, you can guess which side is right.

Jeez, are you trying to imply something about me ?

PS. I suggested a king, not martial law