Thats due to the sense of superiority over women.
So what you're saying is that men are physically stronger than women because of their "sense of superiority"?
If today lets say there is a economic collapse worldwide, there is a shortage of food and water, civilization as we know it no longer exists, tell me who will women survive?
Everything will eventually come back to the way it originally was, ie; Man the leader of the family, clan, tribe, village, town, or whatever you want to call it.
Whats the use of physically strong if the person is mentally weak or darpok.
"Darpok"???? So you mean to tell me that all of those millions of men who fought bravely in those trenches, in those battlefields, in the high seas to thousands of feet in the air as well as under the deep blue oceans, knowing they will have spears, blades, arrows, bullets, artillery/tank shells, shrapnel, piercing through their body, shredding them to pieces and that they will never see their loved ones ever again, and the ones who survived were permanently mentally scarred for life, yet they courageously stood their ground for what they believed in because to them it was worthy enough to go through all of the misery thrown at them, they had the courage which you are here downplaying.
And you just diss them like that by calling them "darpok"?
Men were the pioneers, engineers of the societies we currently live in. They discovered, they built, they invented, they fought, they sacrificed, and its just messed up to see people belittle them.
Anyways, were these men "darpok's"?:
Shell Shock Victim (WW1) - YouTube
WW1 Shellshock - YouTube