Did Sheikh Hasina actually meet the Indian Foreign Secretary ? All signs point to a NO.

[DalalErMaNodi]

You may know better given your possible access to such information but what I found strange is that, she wouldn't do so for mere photo op...

Or is it an old photo?

This could be an old photo, but there one with Covid flavour 'mask'.

She did meet him but the circumstances are strange, something is very wrong.

 

[The Eagle]

She did meet him but the circumstances are strange, something is very wrong.

That is an interesting take.

 

[DalalErMaNodi]

That is an interesting take.

Delhi is afraid, Hasina has broken free, there will be many attempts now to get her back into the fold but look closely and you'll see SHW is playing India against China.

Milking both the cows, keeping India happy is key, when India is happy, we can continue the good work of economic growth without them sending in R&AW to hamper us.



We don't have nukes unlike pakistan, the only way out from under India's hegemonic thumbs is economic might for us.


When you hit a certain threshold, your economic partners (in our case the US and EU) will safeguard your interests.

Nobody wants trade disruption in today's trade dependant world.

This is what you are witnessing now, slowly but surely, India is backing off inch by inch, day by day.


We are set to become a trillion dollar economy in the early 2030s, that means more trade with more powerful partners, for India it means their days of dadagiri over Bangladesh are over.


India's days in Bangladesh are numbered and the number is in the open; it's 10 years.

 

[The Eagle]

Delhi is afraid, Hasina has broken free, there will be many attempts now to get her back into the fold but look closely and you'll see SHW is playing India against China.

Milking both the cows, keeping India happy is key, when India is happy, we can continue the good work of economic growth without them sending in R&AW to hamper us.



We don't have nukes unlike pakistan, the only way out from under India's hegemonic thumbs is economic might for us.


When you hit a certain threshold, your economic partners (in our case the US and EU) will safeguard your interests.

Nobody wants trade disruption in today's trade dependant world.

This is what you are witnessing now, slowly but surely, India is backing off inch by inch, day by day.


We are set to become a trillion dollar economy in the early 2030s, that means more trade with more powerful partners, for India it means their days of dadagiri over Bangladesh are over.


India's days in Bangladesh are numbered and the number is in the open; it's 10 years.

I get the gist of your post for given timeline. What I am suggesting is that, SHW has been living on Indian Aid for her political career and gains and by the time, she will proven to be SHW again when it comes to domestic politics. In this case, as she aligns herself with China slowly and making an attempt to milk both especially a baniya; I will be surprised. Such moves may ire the opposition against China and that looks like yet another deceptive attempt where India will act like they are abandoned by SHW while opposition will be made to believe that now China supports here to remain in power. Internally, she might be playing the same game where India would have already made a lot of promises with the US backing and she may be very well aware of such a worthy market. Actually, the woman herself can't be trusted.

 

[DalalErMaNodi]

I get the gist of your post for given timeline. What I am suggesting is that, SHW has been living on Indian Aid for her political career and gains and by the time, she will proven to be SHW again when it comes to domestic politics. In this case, as she aligns herself with China slowly and making an attempt to milk both especially a baniya; I will be surprised. Such moves may ire the opposition against China and that looks like yet another deceptive attempt where India will act like they are abandoned by SHW while opposition will be made to believe that now China supports here to remain in power. Internally, she might be playing the same game where India would have already made a lot of promises with the US backing and she may be very well aware of such a worthy market. Actually, the woman herself can't be trusted.

She will not contest the next election, she said it on German DW interview.


She doesn't need India to keep her in power anymore and if you read this thread me and few users have pointed out the opposition are spineless.

The opposition is currently busy soul searching, they won't be capable of anything for a good while.

 

[VikingRaider]

I agree. Men like fakhrul are diamond in the rough, rough for them being in a useless party like BNP.

Forget Political pets .What if in future we make an amendment in our constitution and bring back presidential form again ? I believe men like Fakhruddin can be elected as president by direct vote of people.

Parliamentary system is a joke in county like Bangladesh. Specially when article 70 literally made this system farcical. It gave the immunity to prime minister.

An executive president can be better for Bangladesh I think. At least I believe that dependency on party goons toto win election is always a bad idea.

So only an excutive president can rule Bangladesh with iron fist .

But indeed he must be a man . A woman is not very good when the case is ruling a nation.

@DalalErMaNodi , your thoughts please .

 

[VikingRaider]

He met Hasina.

But this news of BBC bangla also confirmed that Hasina did not meet shringla . I just read this now.

Here is the striking part.

মি: শ্রিংলা বাংলাদেশের প্রধানমন্ত্রী শেখ হাসিনার সাথেও দেখা করে প্রায় এক ঘন্টা সময় ধরে তারা আলোচনা করেছেন।

কিন্তু প্রধানমন্ত্রীর সাথে সেই বৈঠকের কথা বাংলাদেশ সরকারের পক্ষ থেকে স্বীকারই করা হয়নি।

আর ভারতের পক্ষ থেকে সেই বৈঠকের কথা বলা হলেও আলোচনা বিষয় স্পষ্ট করা হয়নি।

Source : https://www.bbc.com/bengali/news-53839440.amp



PS : What supa power will do now if if even lose Bangladesh as ally ? Already Nepal ,Maldives and even Bhutan got out of hand . So if enemy is evetywhere , I am wondering how the supa power will counter them.

In north big threat China , Nepal and Bhutan , at sea it's Maldives and Srilnaka . In west traditional enemy Pakistan! And finally in easter side Bangladesh.

I call it chakravuya . Is there is any Arjuna (outside Mahabharata) to break this chakravuhya? ; ) . Dada ji is trapped I think.

 

[Bengal71]

But this news of BBC bangla also confirmed that Hasina did not meet shringla . I just read this now.

Here is the striking part.

মি: শ্রিংলা বাংলাদেশের প্রধানমন্ত্রী শেখ হাসিনার সাথেও দেখা করে প্রায় এক ঘন্টা সময় ধরে তারা আলোচনা করেছেন।

কিন্তু প্রধানমন্ত্রীর সাথে সেই বৈঠকের কথা বাংলাদেশ সরকারের পক্ষ থেকে স্বীকারই করা হয়নি।

আর ভারতের পক্ষ থেকে সেই বৈঠকের কথা বলা হলেও আলোচনা বিষয় স্পষ্ট করা হয়নি।

Source : https://www.bbc.com/bengali/news-53839440.amp



PS : What supa power will do now if if even lose Bangladesh as ally ? Already Nepal ,Maldives and even Bhutan got out of hand . So if enemy is evetywhere , I am wondering how the supa power will counter them.

In north big threat China , Nepal and Bhutan , at sea it's Maldives and Srilnaka . In west traditional enemy Pakistan! And finally in easter side Bangladesh.

I call it chakravuya . Is there is any Arjuna (outside Mahabharata) to break this chakravuhya? ; ) . Dada ji is trapped I think.

BD ar India r vitor ki hoilo ami akhono kisu bujhtesi na.

 

[VikingRaider]

Eikhane ekta chagla mod ase, onno vasha decklei delete kore ancholik vasha allowed ba ei jonno. Kintu chagla ta or nijer desher vasha dekhele kisu koi na.

BD ar India r vitor ki hoilo ami akhono kisu bujhtesi na.

Simply shey bujhe na amader bhasha . Tai oke dosh diao lav nai . However be sure relationship between India and Bangladesh will be worsen . Because no longer Bangladesh will tolerate dadagiri of India .

 

[Bengal71]

Hm thik . Tobe Simply shey bujhe na amader bhasha . Tai oke dosh diao lav nai . However be sure relationship between India and Bangladesh will be worsen . Because no longer Bangladesh will tolerate dadagiri of India .

I am not sure about that. It depends on how much gut hasina has. One of the worst things Hasina and all previous governments did is neglect of the military. BD will regret it one day.

 

[VikingRaider]

I am not sure about that. It depends on how much gut hasina has. One of the worst things Hasina and all previous governments did is neglect of the military. BD will regret it one day.

Actually no one is sure mate . All we believe are based on what we see with bare eyes and most of time that are not true .

But yes former regimes did not try to improve military, specially Khaleda Zia . Pakistan will not invade us as they share no land border with us . SO if we need a stronger military , surely it is to protect our country from Indian aggression.

So now you decide who was actually responsible for this situation ? And who are actually Indian stooge ? Who are trying to develop military or who tried to weaken our military by stealing defence budget?

If Bangladesh has weak defence force who will be the most beneficial?Indeed it's India . Do not count Myanmer as they are nothing .

The game has started from 1940 , when Lahore resolution ( movement for separate homeland for Muslims in this region ) was proposed by Sher e Bangla A.K Fazlul Haq. The dream of Akhand bharat was finished brutally . Myanmer was not part of it .


later in our freedom fight India came at the last time ,when we almost won the war. India only came to steal our glory and to devour Bangladesh . We must not forget that it was Bangabandhu sheikh Mujib who saved Bangladesh by compelling India to withdraw it's army from Bangladesh .

There are many calculation mate . Mela hisab nikash baki ache bujhlen bhai . Sei hisab gulo asha kori samne kora hobe , just chokh kan khola rakhen ar dekhte thaken.

 

[Mad Scientist 2.0]

Good for BD. But on a serious note BD can try to move away from Indian influence but in foreseeable future it cannot do that reasons are many but solutions is none.

 

[Michael Corleone]

He will be assassinated, If he returns, BNP will clean house.


Khaleda is dead.

Khaleda is sitting in the shadows of Ershad’s Basil tree
Oh the irony

 

[VikingRaider]

Khaleda is sitting in the shadows of Ershad’s Basil tree
Oh the irony

Tbh there is similarities between the debor and bhabi . Debor rules 9 years ,while bhabi 10 years . Debor was elected in 1986 too where bhabi boycotted election (we will not argue as its debor bhabi aka family matter lol) , but AL was part of the election so the election was legal . BNP was not big team that time . They became big when bhabi of Ershad ( Khaleda zia ) won the election.

Later bhabi put debor in shoshur bari aka jail .

Later bhabi was in jail too before the mercy bell from Hasina.

PS : Zia and Ershad both was general. So that literally make Khaleda Zia his bhabi. Wife of friend or colleague is actually friendly bhabi . But for ultra romantic individual like Ershad she was perhaps loving bhabi who later put him in jail. Same for Hasina Apa who gave the same treatment to once loving khaleda zia.

 

[Pakistansdefender]

Are you a bangaldeshi?
Tell me. Isnt she invincible at this point.
She still needs new delhi to win? Why?
I dont understand. The bengali friends claim she is pm till death and you lot paint a different pic.

You have to give it to Hasina. She’s playing hard to get probably for benefits in the next election