as many as needed .... but I think you missed the second point
Working Institutions which mean those institutions which already exist but not working or performing under par should Work for the their intended purpose as per Laws
IF Freedom from BRITISH INDIA was the principle Objective of Pakistan movement then there was no need for the Demand of Separate Homeland for Muslims of South Asia plz read
Allam Iqbal's in his address in 1930
Quote:
on the other hand,
an opportunity for Islam to rid itself of the stamp that Arabian Imperialism was forced to give it, to mobilise its laws its education, its culture and bring them into closer contact with its own original spirit and with the spirit of modern times".
Quaid-e-Azam Quoted as under:
In his presidential address at the Special Pakistan Session of the Punjab Muslim Students Federation on
March 2, 1941 discussing the cultural difference of two nations the Quaid said:
"We are a nation, (cheers.) And a nation must have a territory. What is the use of merely saying that we are a nation? Nation does not live in the air. It lives on the land, it must govern, and it must have territorial state and that is what you want to get. (cheers).
He continued: "Our demand is not from Hindus because the Hindus never took the whole of India. It was the Muslims who took India and ruled for 700 years. It was the British who took India from the Musalmans. So, we are not asking the Hindus to give us anything. Our demand is made to the British, who are in possession. It is an utter nonsense to say that Hindustan belongs to the Hindus. They also say that Muslims were Hindus at one time. These nonsensical arguments are advanced by their leaders. They say, supposing an Englishman becomes a Muslim in England, he does not ask for Pakistan. Have you got eyes to see and don't you have brains to understand that an Englishman, if he changes his religion in England, he, by changing his religion, still remains a member of the same society, with the same culture, same social life and everything remains exactly the same when an Englishman changes his faith? But can't you see that a Muslim, when he was converted, granted that he was converted more than a thousand years ago, but of them, then according to your Hindu religion and philosophy, he becomes an outcast and he becomes a maleech (untouchable) and the Hindus cease to have anything to do with him socially, religiously and culturally or in any other way? He, therefore, belongs to a different order, not only religious but social, and he has lived in that distinctly separate and antagonistic social order, religiously, socially and culturally.
The only solution for the Muslims of India which will stand the test of trial and time, is that India should be partitioned so that both the communities can develop freely and fully according to their own genius economically, socially, culturally."
Unquote (
link)
I quote further below from the same link
"
Pakistan not only means freedom and independence but the Muslim Ideology which has to be preserved and which has come to us as a precious gift and treasure and which we hope others will share with us."
Economic, Social and Cultural development were associated reason to demand Separate Homeland
Note:
Link is same for both of the quotes of Alama Iqbal and Quaid-i-Azam
