PeaceGen
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2012
- Messages
- 3,889
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
I'm going to keep this brief, because at this time i'm quite pissed off with western freedom of speech "protectors".
Citizens in the west are very much manipulated to be offended enough to show up with 1.5 million people in Paris to protect freedom of speech to extend to insults of the Prophet Mohammed, something proven to perpetuate the war between "the free west" (not so free, i assure you based on my life experience) and more and more muslims..
But when I made a totally peaceful thread on a compuserve US-Republican forum about the need to do someting about climate change, they first tried all of their dirty discussion techniques to derail me presenting my case there. When that didn't work, the thread was simply deleted by moderators. A repost was deleted as well.
This is thrown under the right for companies to delete whatever they want off their servers, but I say that's a very dirty way to censor freedom of speech to protect the corrupt and closed-minded in the west.
The same thing happened when I posted valid criticism of western medicine practices on a Dutch site. Deleted because the site moderators didnt like it.
That put together is evidence enough that western freedom of speech is already censored, and that the calls for our freedom to keep insulting the Prophet Mohammed are very very hypocritical and reason for me to reconsider staying involved in the war on terror at all, or even to "switch sides" in the view of my allies in NATO intel.
I don't give a damn about "keeping government out of the business world". I think that fosters short term greed and see that generating quite a bit of suffering that is ignored as "the way of the world" by the western propaganda machines.
If we in the west are as serious about freedom of speech as we push our citizens to be on this insulting of the Prophet Mohammed, then western governments should determine what can stay online on a public forum, not the company behind the forum, creating an actually level playing field on the internet.
I am one very dissapointed puppy. I expect this criticism to be ignored as well. But I'm open to be surprised by western governments.
This thread will be emailed to : "NOS" <reacties@nos.nl>, "VandaagDeDag" <tips@vandaagdedag.nu>, "CNN" <worldnews@cnn.com>, "CNBC" <customercare@support.cnbc.com>, "CIA" <info@cia.gov>, "NSA" <nsapao@nsa.gov>, info@whitehouse.gov, "Mossad" <info@gov.il>, info@groenlinks.nl, christenunie@tweedekamer.nl, sgp@tweedekamer.nl, info@vvd.nl, info@pvv.nl, info@50pluspartij.nl, info@sp.nl, info@pvda.nl, d66@tweedekamer.nl, info@pvdd.nl, redactie@3fm.nl
Citizens in the west are very much manipulated to be offended enough to show up with 1.5 million people in Paris to protect freedom of speech to extend to insults of the Prophet Mohammed, something proven to perpetuate the war between "the free west" (not so free, i assure you based on my life experience) and more and more muslims..
But when I made a totally peaceful thread on a compuserve US-Republican forum about the need to do someting about climate change, they first tried all of their dirty discussion techniques to derail me presenting my case there. When that didn't work, the thread was simply deleted by moderators. A repost was deleted as well.
This is thrown under the right for companies to delete whatever they want off their servers, but I say that's a very dirty way to censor freedom of speech to protect the corrupt and closed-minded in the west.
The same thing happened when I posted valid criticism of western medicine practices on a Dutch site. Deleted because the site moderators didnt like it.
That put together is evidence enough that western freedom of speech is already censored, and that the calls for our freedom to keep insulting the Prophet Mohammed are very very hypocritical and reason for me to reconsider staying involved in the war on terror at all, or even to "switch sides" in the view of my allies in NATO intel.
I don't give a damn about "keeping government out of the business world". I think that fosters short term greed and see that generating quite a bit of suffering that is ignored as "the way of the world" by the western propaganda machines.
If we in the west are as serious about freedom of speech as we push our citizens to be on this insulting of the Prophet Mohammed, then western governments should determine what can stay online on a public forum, not the company behind the forum, creating an actually level playing field on the internet.
I am one very dissapointed puppy. I expect this criticism to be ignored as well. But I'm open to be surprised by western governments.
This thread will be emailed to : "NOS" <reacties@nos.nl>, "VandaagDeDag" <tips@vandaagdedag.nu>, "CNN" <worldnews@cnn.com>, "CNBC" <customercare@support.cnbc.com>, "CIA" <info@cia.gov>, "NSA" <nsapao@nsa.gov>, info@whitehouse.gov, "Mossad" <info@gov.il>, info@groenlinks.nl, christenunie@tweedekamer.nl, sgp@tweedekamer.nl, info@vvd.nl, info@pvv.nl, info@50pluspartij.nl, info@sp.nl, info@pvda.nl, d66@tweedekamer.nl, info@pvdd.nl, redactie@3fm.nl