DG ISPR Welcomes New Indian Army Chief !

[Wrath]

@AsifGhafoor

Does Pakistan hold the capability of striking RSS Nazi targets in the Kashmir valley?

Yes . As shown in Swift retort Op .

 

[Wrath]

surprise me every day of my life and i be yours

Slave right ?

 

[Wrath]

I am ready

Take that big eye thingy with you

 

[Wrath]

Check world media how they reported 27 feb... We have the capability dude

How to check bro . Can't see much on YouTube !!!

 

[SIPRA]

Real humiliation comes when a broke country that is 7x smaller then you has to serve your pilot tea right after you talk about 56" chests and what not.

Is 56" size of the chest or something else, particularly after Feb 27?

 

[TheGreatMaratha]

Are you retarded?
Seriously asking.

Let me spell it out for you.

about 40,000 troops in East Pakistan were cut off from the mainland by thousands of Km of hostile territory. No supplies, no back up, NOTHING
And they were up a against a multi million man army.

There is no shame in this defeat as no army on earth could have won in this situation.

Real humiliation comes when a broke country that is 7x smaller then you has to serve your pilot tea right after you talk about 56" chests and what not.

Oh and 71 happened almost 50 years ago.
What excuse do you have for served tea less then 1 year ago?

Umm..okay. So real humiliation is not when 90000 people surrender and returned back but when a pilot is captured and served tea and returned back. No wonder you said that million soldiers fought against 40000 in East Pakistan. You love to exaggerate don't you?

 

[Rusty]

Umm..okay. So real humiliation is not when 90000 people surrender and returned back but when a pilot is captured and served tea and returned back. No wonder you said that million soldiers fought against 40000 in East Pakistan. You love to exaggerate don't you?

The funny thing is, Supa pawa 2020 India is so proud of this.
Could you imagine the US or Russia bragging about defeating 40,000 troops with millions of men and the 40,000 having no supplies or backup?

India, a nation of 1.5 billion people.....is proud that they won a battle that any dummy could have won given India's situation.

Back to what you said.
Tell me, for a nation that shits in the streets and feels zero humiliation, how can you expect us to feel humiliated that you took civilians as POW?
Majority of the 90,000 that you love to brag about were women, children, and civilian men.
Hey everyone, check it out, not only are Indians are proud of shitting in streets, they are also proud of taking women and children as POW.

As for the 40,000 something troops, they were dealt a bad hand. No army on Earth could have won in their situation. No humiliation in that.


Real humiliation is when you fake bomb a nation to show your chest. Then in a fair fight loose a jet, shoot down your own chopper and have your pilot paraded on TV talking about fantastic tea.


PS. If you had an IQ above 10 you would realize I never said 40,000 fought against a million. I said they faced a multi million men army. Meaning that India had the ability to filed millions of men against them. It's okay, I don't blame you for this, it is scientifically proven that you people have a low IQ.

 

[TheGreatMaratha]

The funny thing is, Supa pawa 2020 India is so proud of this.
Could you imagine the US or Russia bragging about defeating 40,000 troops with millions of men and the 40,000 having no supplies or backup?

India, a nation of 1.5 billion people.....is proud that they won a battle that any dummy could have won given India's situation.

Back to what you said.
Tell me, for a nation that shits in the streets and feels zero humiliation, how can you expect us to feel humiliated that you took civilians as POW?
Majority of the 90,000 that you love to brag about were women, children, and civilian men.
Hey everyone, check it out, not only are Indians are proud of shitting in streets, they are also proud of taking women and children as POW.

As for the 40,000 something troops, they were dealt a bad hand. No army on Earth could have won in their situation. No humiliation in that.


Real humiliation is when you fake bomb a nation to show your chest. Then in a fair fight loose a jet, shoot down your own chopper and have your pilot paraded on TV talking about fantastic tea.


PS. If you had an IQ above 10 you would realize I never said 40,000 fought against a million. I said they faced a multi million men army. Meaning that India had the ability to filed millions of men against them. It's okay, I don't blame you for this, it is scientifically proven that you people have a low IQ.

Ok first up, the tone of your post clearly looks insecure. Random abuses in between. I personally never abuse a person and your maturity is clearly reflected in your post. Only an insecure person will continuously call others street shitters, low IQ, etc.

Next thing, India's population is 1.3 billion and not 1.5 billion. You clearly have a problem with numbers and conveniently inflate numbers to suit your agenda. Also you clearly mentioned million Indian soldiers fought against East Pakistan. That simply isn't possible as it would mean we are not keeping any of our soldiers on Western border.

Pakistani surrender was the largest surrender in history since WW 2 and that is a fact. 40000 troops were not dealt a bad hand, you clearly lost because of poor leadership. Accept that. India was simply superior strategically and finished everything in less than a month.

Next thing, instead of analysing why there were so few troops in BD you say that India was bound to win. What I'm asking is: Why didn't you guys attack the Western border. Why did your preemptive attacks on airbases fail?

And based on your arguments with others, I clearly see that you have some mental issue. Continuous abuses in between doesn't help your cause. I rest my case as I'm sure I will get a typical troll like reply from you.

 

[SIPRA]

The funny thing is, Supa pawa 2020 India is so proud of this.
Could you imagine the US or Russia bragging about defeating 40,000 troops with millions of men and the 40,000 having no supplies or backup?

India, a nation of 1.5 billion people.....is proud that they won a battle that any dummy could have won given India's situation.

Back to what you said.
Tell me, for a nation that shits in the streets and feels zero humiliation, how can you expect us to feel humiliated that you took civilians as POW?
Majority of the 90,000 that you love to brag about were women, children, and civilian men.
Hey everyone, check it out, not only are Indians are proud of shitting in streets, they are also proud of taking women and children as POW.

As for the 40,000 something troops, they were dealt a bad hand. No army on Earth could have won in their situation. No humiliation in that.


Real humiliation is when you fake bomb a nation to show your chest. Then in a fair fight loose a jet, shoot down your own chopper and have your pilot paraded on TV talking about fantastic tea.


PS. If you had an IQ above 10 you would realize I never said 40,000 fought against a million. I said they faced a multi million men army. Meaning that India had the ability to filed millions of men against them. It's okay, I don't blame you for this, it is scientifically proven that you people have a low IQ.

We must appreciate that the forced occupation of Kashmir and the active participation in separation of East Pakistan, by India, are the psychological expressions of their hegemony and supremacy, which arises out of their perceived victimhood, humiliation and subjugation, starting with the occupation of Sindh by Muhammad bin Qasim, and more particularly, with the attacks of Sultan Mahmud Ghaznavi, which continued for almost about 600 years. They cannot escape from the psychological trauma of this whole period.

 

[Rusty]

Ok first up, the tone of your post clearly looks insecure. Random abuses in between. I personally never abuse a person and your maturity is clearly reflected in your post. Only an insecure person will continuously call others street shitters, low IQ, etc.

Next thing, India's population is 1.3 billion and not 1.5 billion. You clearly have a problem with numbers and conveniently inflate numbers to suit your agenda. Also you clearly mentioned million Indian soldiers fought against East Pakistan. That simply isn't possible as it would mean we are not keeping any of our soldiers on Western border.

Pakistani surrender was the largest surrender in history since WW 2 and that is a fact. 40000 troops were not dealt a bad hand, you clearly lost because of poor leadership. Accept that. India was simply superior strategically and finished everything in less than a month.

Next thing, instead of analysing why there were so few troops in BD you say that India was bound to win. What I'm asking is: Why didn't you guys attack the Western border. Why did your preemptive attacks on airbases fail?

And based on your arguments with others, I clearly see that you have some mental issue. Continuous abuses in between doesn't help your cause. I rest my case as I'm sure I will get a typical troll like reply from you.

When you talk to a dog you don't use proper English, you talk to them in a way they can understand.
My interactions with Indians online has taught me that this is the only way Indians ever understand things.
Trust me, When I used to treat Indian with respect, they would spit in my face. They way I treat you is my defense against you people spitting in my face.

Oh no, nit picking numbers... argument of a man who has clearly lost.

*Ahem*
I, Rusty, get on my knees and officially apologize for claiming 1.5 billion street shitters instead of 1.3.... the world would have been a much much worse place had there been 200,000 more street shitters then there actually are.

Happy?

And quote me! Find the quote where I said 40,000 FOUGHT a million!!!
You can't

You are also not educated enough to know the meaning of "Faced"
I will teach you.

Faced means something/someone who is your adversary.
It does not mean you fought each and every person/thing.

The 40,000 troops faced an Indian army that had millions of troops.
It did not fight millions, but had the 40,000 troops fought and won one battle, they would have to face the next and next and next as India could bring millions of troops to fight.

I really hope you understand what I am saying... but I fear it might be too high IQ for you.

You are really fixated on the "after ww2" bit.
Why?
Why does that matter at all?
Does it help you masturbate?

And what strategic leadership?
They were stranded!
You now expect us to be able to move countries around the map so they can be closer to us?
Trust me, if we could we would move as far away from rapistan as we could.

Once again, no country on earth had 2 large parts of it's nation on the other side of a hostile country that was many, many times larger then it.
There is no analogy on Earth that compares.
The troops in East Pakistan knew they could not win and chose to save lives over wasting them for nothing.
India should actually be grateful for this as Indian lives were saved too.... unfortunately some of those saved Indian lives undoubtedly gave birth to a few rapist...so for the sake of Indian women maybe we should have fought a little longer.... oh well

Why are you strategizing for Pakistan now?
What's done is done.
Pakistan did the best it could with the resources it had.
It was given a bad hand in 47 and India took advantage of it.
No shame in that.

Real shame comes form starting one sided panga with people who warn you to not start shit, then loosing aircraft after bragging about starting the panga.

World now knows Pakistani tea is fantastic so thank you I guess.

 

[TheGreatMaratha]

We must appreciate that the forced occupation of Kashmir and the active participation in separation of East Pakistan, by India, are the psychological expressions of their hegemony and supremacy, which arises out of their perceived victimhood, humiliation and subjugation, starting with the occupation of Sindh by Muhammad bin Qasim, and more particularly, with the attacks of Sultan Mahmud Ghaznavi, which continued for almost about 600 years. They cannot escape from the psychological trauma of this whole period.

Umm...it was the people of Pakistan that have been more occupied by foreigners than Indians themselves. I have explained this countless times. Ghaznavi/bin Qasim, etc do not even belong to the soil of India/Pakistan. Your talking as if Pakistani people always had its own independent state and these foreigners conveniently bypassed you guys. People of Pakistani land don't even have a ruler of their own except maybe Ranjit Singh. No wonder you have missiles named after Turks/Afghans, etc as you don't have strong rulers from your own land.

 

[Tps43]

surprise me every day of my life and i be yours

let me surprise u

 

[TheGreatMaratha]

When you talk to a dog you don't use proper English, you talk to them in a way they can understand.
My interactions with Indians online has taught me that this is the only way Indians ever understand things.
Trust me, When I used to treat Indian with respect, they would spit in my face. They way I treat you is my defense against you people spitting in my face.

Oh no, nit picking numbers... argument of a man who has clearly lost.

*Ahem*
I, Rusty, get on my knees and officially apologize for claiming 1.5 billion street shitters instead of 1.3.... the world would have been a much much worse place had there been 200,000 more street shitters then there actually are.

Happy?

And quote me! Find the quote where I said 40,000 FOUGHT a million!!!
You can't

You are also not educated enough to know the meaning of "Faced"
I will teach you.

Faced means something/someone who is your adversary.
It does not mean you fought each and every person/thing.

The 40,000 troops faced an Indian army that had millions of troops.
It did not fight millions, but had the 40,000 troops fought and won one battle, they would have to face the next and next and next as India could bring millions of troops to fight.

I really hope you understand what I am saying... but I fear it might be too high IQ for you.

You are really fixated on the "after ww2" bit.
Why?
Why does that matter at all?
Does it help you masturbate?

And what strategic leadership?
They were stranded!
You now expect us to be able to move countries around the map so they can be closer to us?
Trust me, if we could we would move as far away from rapistan as we could.

Once again, no country on earth had 2 large parts of it's nation on the other side of a hostile country that was many, many times larger then it.
There is no analogy on Earth that compares.
The troops in East Pakistan knew they could not win and chose to save lives over wasting them for nothing.
India should actually be grateful for this as Indian lives were saved too.... unfortunately some of those saved Indian lives undoubtedly gave birth to a few rapist...so for the sake of Indian women maybe we should have fought a little longer.... oh well

Why are you strategizing for Pakistan now?
What's done is done.
Pakistan did the best it could with the resources it had.
It was given a bad hand in 47 and India took advantage of it.
No shame in that.

Real shame comes form starting one sided panga with people who warn you to not start shit, then loosing aircraft after bragging about starting the panga.

World now knows Pakistani tea is fantastic so thank you I guess.

I clearly know the type of person you are so please save your efforts with these long posts. And I'm sure you will troll on this comment of mine as well.

 

[Rusty]

I clearly know the type of person you are so please save your efforts with these long posts. And I'm sure you will troll on this comment of mine as well.

I do admit part of my posts are trolling, but that's all part of 5th gen warfare

However, facts are facts and I laid down a factual, coherent argument.

You are free to ignore the trolling and address the argument but it might be easier for you to just let this one go since ... you know...my argument is pretty factual and coherent

 

[SIPRA]

Umm...it was the people of Pakistan that have been more occupied by foreigners than Indians themselves. I have explained this countless times. Ghaznavi/bin Qasim, etc do not even belong to the soil of India/Pakistan. Your talking as if Pakistani people always had its own independent state and these foreigners conveniently bypassed you guys. People of Pakistani land don't even have a ruler of their own except maybe Ranjit Singh. No wonder you have missiles named after Turks/Afghans, etc as you don't have strong rulers from your own land.

You are, very properly, being encountered by @Rusty. Attend to him.

If you don't believe, what I have posted; go to a good psychologist and get yourself psychoanalyzed, you would get the answer.