What's new

DG ISPR shows up all missiles unfired from MIG-21

I have been beating the same drum on twitter all day long.....no one bothered answering....may be @KapitaanAli can answer this....in our case he have shown everything except warhead....they got nothing but a busted up AMRAAM section

View attachment 551464 View attachment 551465 View attachment 551466 View attachment 551467
Sir, the problem is not with the evidence, because rest of the world accepts what Pakistan has shown and independent experts have found out from DFLabs to Finnish experts, news reporters, and now this final report from US officials.

The problem lies with Indians' instinct. They are taught to lie and cheat since childhood. They need to survive in a sea of 1.3 billion people so they need to be street smart, cunning, & deceiving and these characteristics are appreciated by their parents. So the cheating culture starts from home, streets, schools and goes right to the top and thus a lot of call centres, successfully defrauding westerners in the name of Microsoft, HealthCare & IRS etc. Once we understand this mentality, we will mount the answer in the currency the understand. Otherwise, they will keep lying blatantly.
 
. . .
The whole exploding section of one R73 is missing. : )
so what? the rear part e.g: which comprises of booster and sustainer motor is still there and you should know some basic things or you'll be considered as amateur because motor is the thing to generate the thrust and move missile forward so plzz don't say that exploding portion of r73 hit our f16 without motor section.
 
. .
My bad. I haven't read related threads.

But to me, the seeker of the Archer with the missing midsection including warhead is unharmed and thus unlikely to have been come from a burnt wing. Meanwhile the seeker of the other one looks damaged.

I don't know if the F16 was shot down, but this "evidence" stinks and doesn't convince me that it wasn't. Until the DGISPR gives an explanation on the "Indian pilot" admitted in the hospital and the other "Indian pilot" on the run, I'd rather not believe him.

I believe I'm being very neutral in my analysis.

Hi.

Upon detonation, the metal around the warhead is fragmented while the metal around the seeker can also although it is likely to survive. But one that happens for certain is that the avionics inside the seeker are completely disintegrated, so what you end up with is an empty shell usually, sort of like that AIM shell IAF showed.

Over here you can see the avionics inside the seekers fully intact, it is not simply a shell. But you can see burn damage on it, as the jet was hit and sent into flames.
 
.
My bad. I haven't read related threads.

But to me, the seeker of the Archer with the missing midsection including warhead is unharmed and thus unlikely to have been come from a burnt wing. Meanwhile the seeker of the other one looks damaged.

I don't know if the F16 was shot down, but this "evidence" stinks and doesn't convince me that it wasn't. Until the DGISPR gives an explanation on the "Indian pilot" admitted in the hospital and the other "Indian pilot" on the run, I'd rather not believe him.

I believe I'm being very neutral in my analysis.
You will loose credibility when you double report a person in time of war (and corrected within hours)but will not loose credibility while lying for over a month about balakot attacks???
 
.
My bad. I haven't read related threads.

But to me, the seeker of the Archer with the missing midsection including warhead is unharmed and thus unlikely to have been come from a burnt wing. Meanwhile the seeker of the other one looks damaged.

I don't know if the F16 was shot down, but this "evidence" stinks and doesn't convince me that it wasn't. Until the DGISPR gives an explanation on the "Indian pilot" admitted in the hospital and the other "Indian pilot" on the run, I'd rather not believe him.

I believe I'm being very neutral in my analysis.
Balixdb in post 11 uploaded picture of the pylon attached to burnt exhaust of r73. There is no doubt left on missiles. The Mig-21 didn't fire any.

Besides whole story is full of holes, how could abhinandan fired off missile first when the even the SU-30s couldnt have any lock on PAF. Plus PAF kills are rumored to likely be BVR.

Also the fact that they didn't know they had lost a MIG-21 but had starting claiming a f-16 before that. Abhinandan was confirmed only after his capture video was available.

Will have to wait more for details but Indian narrative is now rediculed everywhere.
 
. .
DG ISPR has never revealed anything new. Just keeps confirming whatever is already on public domain.
Armed forces dont reveal stuff...only what public needs to know....or already knows :agree:
 
. . . . . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom