DG ISPR on ICJ verdict: another 27th February for india...another surprise day!

[SIPRA]

Yes, but Pakistan is a signatory to the Vienna Convention, and it must abide by it as applicable.

You are right. But, quite often, different people and countries interpret such conventions and laws, or a part thereof, differently, both with bonafide or malefide intentions and reasons. That appears to be case here, as well.

 

[Vortex]

Yes, but Pakistan is a signatory to the Vienna Convention, and it must abide by it as applicable.

Vienna or not Vienna, its a big no.

Imagine one minute that USA or any other country would have let the captured terrorists, (who took oath with AQ, ISIS,etc ) meeting their handlers ?

In our case the terrorist is kulbhushan yadav and the handlers is India.

 

[VCheng]

You are right. But, quite often, different people and countries interpret such conventions and laws, or a part thereof, differently, both with bonafide or malefide intentions and reasons. That appears to be case here, as well.

The interpretation here is by the ICJ, and therefore valid.

Vienna or not Vienna, its a big no.

Imagine one minute that USA or any other country would have let the captured terrorists, (who took oath with AQ, ISIS,etc ) meeting their handlers ?

In our case the terrorist is kulbhushan yadav and the handlers is India.

As long as Pakistan is a signatory, it must abide by the provisions of the Vienna Convention. Of course, if it wants to leave it, then it should declare it to be so.

 

[SIPRA]

The interpretation here is by the ICJ, and therefore valid.

That is merely one more document, that is the decision of the ICJ, to be considered and accounted for. Most probably, you would see in the coming days that this decision, in conjunction with other applicable laws and conventions, would again be interpreted and construed differently, by India and Pakistan, particularly in the matters of details.

 

[VCheng]

That is merely one more document, that is the decision of the ICJ, to be considered and accounted for. Most probably, you would see in the coming days that this decision, in conjunction with other applicable laws and conventions, would again be interpreted and construed differently, by India and Pakistan, particularly in the matters of details.

Sure, let us see how the situation evolves further.

 

[Vortex]

The interpretation here is by the ICJ, and therefore valid.



As long as Pakistan is a signatory, it must abide by the provisions of the Vienna Convention. Of course, if it wants to leave it, then it should declare it to be so.

The interpretation here is by the ICJ, and therefore valid.



As long as Pakistan is a signatory, it must abide by the provisions of the Vienna Convention. Of course, if it wants to leave it, then it should declare it to be so.

Let’s agree to disagree here. Yes I recognise what you said is valid, but I say that for National Security, sorry no consular access.

 

[VCheng]

Let’s agree to disagree here. Yes I recognise what you said is valid, but I say that for National Security, sorry no consular access.

I can accept the disagreement, but please be aware that denying consular access on the basis of national security after the ICJ verdict will raise its own issues, that is all.

 

[Vortex]

I can accept the disagreement, but please be aware that denying consular access on the basis of national security after the ICJ verdict will raise its own issues, that is all.

Will be time to make improvements in the Vienna agreement. Isn’t it ? After all western countries are known to changes laws when situation, stakes evolves. It is up to us to start.

 

[VCheng]

Will be time to make improvements in the Vienna agreement. Isn’t it ? After all western countries are known to changes laws when situation, stakes evolves. It is up to us to start.

Of course Pakistan is free to suggest "improvements" in the Vienna Agreement. Let us see how much support it can gather for such changes, specially after the fact.

 

[Vortex]

Of course Pakistan is free to suggest "improvements" in the Vienna Agreement. Let us see how much support it can gather for such changes, specially after the fact.

We won’t get support because it doesn’t suit to the powerful countries when we are in a period if geopolitical alliances shifting. But it does not meat that we should not have and expose our stand.

 

[VCheng]

We won’t get support because it doesn’t suit to the powerful countries when we are in a period if geopolitical alliances shifting. But it does not meat that we should not have and expose our stand.

Let us see how PMIK deals with the situation in the wake of the ICJ ruling.

 

[Vortex]

Let us see how PMIK deals with the situation in the wake of the ICJ ruling.

For this he need our support, at least we can and should do that.

 

[VCheng]

For this he need our support, at least we can and should do that.

He needs to make sure that Pakistan abides by its international commitments.

 

[Vortex]

He needs to make sure that Pakistan abides by its international commitments.

No. Yes No if the international commitments are no more adapted to the new world.

 

[VCheng]

No. Yes No if the international commitments are no more adapted to the new world.

Let us see what he decides.