What's new

“Destruction of Nord Stream pipeline” — by legendary journalist Seymour Hersh.

. .

FoibroWagAAgMuZ
 
. . .
Is this really seymour hersh? No major media outlet is reporting it and 'seymorehersh.substack' isn't inspiring confidence. If it was really him NYT, Washington Post, CNN- they would be all over it.

If a major outlet reports it, I will accept it as a major scoop. Else it is putin is doing another of his disinfo hit pieces.
 
.
Nearest land to Nordstream blast is Denmark land, it's not USA land.

When USA needs to punish some vassal they often order to do it to the nearest neighbor vassal, so they keep vassals hating each other and loving the metropoli.

Divide and rule.

This fake narrative of USA did it, is to create the fake idea of European states are sovereign and they are not USA puppets.
USA doesnt need to do antyhing, they can order to any European vassal and they will do it. All Ukraine mayhem is a European self suicide in a slow motion obbeying American master orders.
 
.
Is this really seymour hersh? No major media outlet is reporting it and 'seymorehersh.substack' isn't inspiring confidence. If it was really him NYT, Washington Post, CNN- they would be all over it.

If a major outlet reports it, I will accept it as a major scoop. Else it is putin is doing another of his disinfo hit pieces.
As I explained on the other thread,

It's impossible for that to happened in the way whoever this guy claim is happening, you cannot detonate things underwater using Sonar, especially he was talking about C4. You need an ignition source (not just fire but also electrical current) you can't trigger it with wavelengths. If it does, any sort of wave can trigger them, even singing and speaking.

Also, this is not the first case people going banana, I mean we already have Rudy Giuliani goes from American mayor to American nut job, don't underestimate people willingness to do stuff for a few bucks.
 
. .
how did the reporter know that?

Now that's the question isn't it? Definitely not accepting this at face value.

He comes out with compelling legit stuff, then I'll take a second look.
 
.
As I explained on the other thread,

It's impossible for that to happened in the way whoever this guy claim is happening, you cannot detonate things underwater using Sonar, especially he was talking about C4. You need an ignition source (not just fire but also electrical current) you can't trigger it with wavelengths. If it does, any sort of wave can trigger them, even singing and speaking.

Also, this is not the first case people going banana, I mean we already have Rudy Giuliani goes from American mayor to American nut job, don't underestimate people willingness to do stuff for a few bucks.

I'm deeply disappointed with what Guiliani has done to himself. As NY mayor he made such a legend out of himself by going after crime. What he did to himself to secure Trump's approval.....I don't think it was worth it. Today he is ranked along with the ranks of Mike Lindell instead of the hall of famer he should have been.
 
.
I'm deeply disappointed with what Guiliani has done to himself. As NY mayor he made such a legend out of himself by going after crime. What he did to himself to secure Trump's approval.....I don't think it was worth it. Today he is ranked along with the ranks of Mike Lindell instead of the hall of famer he should have been.
well, I wanted to blame popularism, but then Trump weren't really that popular as anything. He isn't when he was a TV guy, he wasn't when he was a businessman and he certainly wasn't when he was POTUS.

I think that's radicalism, I mean people follow them is like anything people follow, from idol to terrorist organisation, the country is so fragmented and there are bound to be some disenfranchised people around, and it literally will take just one nutjob to unite them.
 
. .
Now that's the question isn't it? Definitely not accepting this at face value.

He comes out with compelling legit stuff, then I'll take a second look.

Yes, but watch him being regarded as not credible the moment he comes out with an expose on something inside China. Picking and choosing only when it supports a particular narrative is simply dishonest.
 
.
Yes, but watch him being regarded as not credible the moment he comes out with an expose on something inside China. Picking and choosing only when it supports a particular narrative is simply dishonest.
no usa & european countries that suffer from gas disruption main medias reporting on the reporter's finding.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom