PradoTLC
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2007
- Messages
- 8,888
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
This statement applies to each and every country and their respective leaders.
nope...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This statement applies to each and every country and their respective leaders.
Most probably, his several predecessors registered similar curves, but one can argue they achieved them due to a low based, the bigger the economy becomes, the harder a high growth rate can be maintained.
You sound like a broken western record, how long is sustainable ? China lifted over 800 people out of poverty in the past 40 years, half a century is not sustainable? how long of the history of Singapore all together?Not everything is about GDP. China's growth model before Xi was unsustainable anyway. And China's labor force just happened to start shrinking under Xi's watch, which he is powerless against too.
You sound like a broken western record, how long is sustainable ? China lifted over 800 people out of poverty in the past 40 years, half a century is not sustainable? how long of the history of Singapore all together?
No, I just want to know what do you mean "unsustainable", is 40 years not enough? can you put a time limit on sustainability?Why are you so mad? China's property price and household debt growth was already a growing problem before Xi. What has Singapore got to do with this?
工农中建四大行贷款流向行业(2004-2017)_哔哩哔哩_bilibili
数据可视化框架来自 @狸子LePtC 大佬的开源, 视频播放量 105734、弹幕量 170、点赞数 1449、投硬币枚数 1161、收藏人数 2950、转发人数 2951, 视频作者 账号已注销, 作者简介...b23.tv
No, I just want to know what do you mean "unsustainable", is 40 years not enough? can you put a time limit on sustainability?
温家宝说,近些年来,中国经济保持了平稳、较快的发展,但无论是过去还是将来,都不是评功摆好的时候。
他说,中国经济存在着巨大问题,依然是不稳定、不平衡、不协调、不可持续的结构性的问题。
温家宝表示,所谓不稳定,就是投资增长率过高,信贷投放过多,货币流动性过大,外贸和国际收支不平衡;所谓不平衡,就是城乡之间、地区之间、经济与社会发展之间不平衡;所谓不协调,就是一、二、三产业不协调,投资与消费之间不协调,经济增长过多的依赖于投资和外贸出口;所谓不可持续,就是中国还没能很好地解决节能降耗问题和生态环境问题。
I was not talking about any specific leader, leaders can also have their own personal opinions, I m asking about why you claim that China's development mode is not sustainable, what's the time limit for "not being sustainable"?
So Wen Jiabao is a broken Western record now?
I was not talking about any specific leader, leaders can also have their own personal opinions, I m asking about why you claim that China's development mode is not sustainable, what's the time limit for "not being sustainable"?
温家宝表示,所谓不稳定,就是投资增长率过高,信贷投放过多,货币流动性过大,外贸和国际收支不平衡;所谓不平衡,就是城乡之间、地区之间、经济与社会发展之间不平衡;所谓不协调,就是一、二、三产业不协调,投资与消费之间不协调,经济增长过多的依赖于投资和外贸出口;所谓不可持续,就是中国还没能很好地解决节能降耗问题和生态环境问题。
Why you avoid answering this simple question? what's the time limit for "not being sustainable"?
Why you avoid answering this simple question? what's the time limit for "not being sustainable"?
温家宝表示,所谓不稳定,就是投资增长率过高,信贷投放过多,货币流动性过大,外贸和国际收支不平衡;所谓不平衡,就是城乡之间、地区之间、经济与社会发展之间不平衡;所谓不协调,就是一、二、三产业不协调,投资与消费之间不协调,经济增长过多的依赖于投资和外贸出口;所谓不可持续,就是中国还没能很好地解决节能降耗问题和生态环境问题。
In Singapore, the annual median household income can buy you around 21.95 sqm of housing area (HDB).
In HK, the annual median household income can buy you around 1.94 sqm of housing area.
In Beijing, the annual median household income can buy you around 2.69 sqm of housing area.
In Shenzhen, the annual median household income can buy you around 1.77 sqm of housing area.
People are complaining about housing affordability everywhere in Singapore, and yet in Chinese first-tier cities housing affordability is like 10x worse. It's pretty obvious the Chinese real estate is in a huge bubble. You know it's a huge social issue when affordability is 10x worse than densely populated Singapore, and you can see why their fertility rate is only ~0.8 in the cities.
You claim that China's development model not sustainable makes no sense, it's already been around for 40 plus years and lifted over 800 million people out of poverty, pushing China from one of the poorest countries to upper middle level group, so what's your definition for sustainability?Why do I have to answer your question which makes no sense? When you say eating junk food is unsustainable, you have to give a timeline? I have already provided the reasons (from your leaders nevertheless) and the stats. The fact that China has to slow down to Poland/Malaysian levels of 4-5%+ GDP growth proves that the previous economic model was unsustainable, and has to transition to consumption-led growth.
what's your definition for sustainability?
Then what? sustainability means how long it can last, it's already been around for over 4 decades, still not sustainable in your dictionary? so what 's your definition?Not something like this.
China would have still improved with or without Xi.
So, Chinas development in the 40 years is like people eating junk food to you ? What is stupid comparison that is nothing but just want to put down anything Chinese and China has done is your mission.Why do I have to answer your question which makes no sense? When you say eating junk food is unsustainable, you have to give a timeline? I have already provided the reasons (from your leaders nevertheless) and the stats. The fact that China has to slow down to Poland/Malaysian levels of 4-5%+ GDP growth proves that the previous economic model was unsustainable, and has to transition to consumption-led growth.
Almost ~7x in housing loans in 9 years.