arihant
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2009
- Messages
- 1,815
- Reaction score
- 0
But you see Makkah's mosque is documented, its in videos we know it exists. The fact that there was a temple that was destroyed by Babur has been disproved, its a lame duck theory.
The temple wasn't there. The sinister act was carried out by BJP to shoot itself to fame which was previously in no competition to the congress.
That is what I am saying.
Evidence have been found that there was temple. Rocks and material used in temples where found under the land nearby mosque and some of its rock inside the wall of mosque itself. Moreover, this flame is not the recent, even British were force to close the mosque in the late 1930's. So the heat is not by BJP or someone else, but it already present from centuries.
You are not reading the history, let me tell you some truth.
This masjid was called "masjid-e-janamstha" (mosque of the birthplace) . It self says masjid was built on the Birth place of Rama which we celebrate as Janam sthal. Also, abar, whose general Mir Baqi allegedly destroyed this temple at Ayodhya, built by the Hindus to commemorate their king Samrat Ramchandra. Mir Baqi built a mosque at the site of the destroyed temple. Name of Masjid was changed by J. Nehru in 1950-60's to its present name Babri Masjid.
Babri Masjid is not the single claim of building of mosque on temple but its just one of the biggest. Other areas where it has been build are varansi and Mathura.
Even area where I live, Jain temple was demolished in place of that Mosque was build. It would be right to reclaim those done forcefully.