Like I said with Ram temple, it is our land. Hindu need not be apologetic to anyone to build a temple anywhere we want. It's not like Babri masjid is native to this land. The religion itself is from a invaders.
So you are going to force undo everything which happened in the past? Next you are going to forcibly do ghar-waapsi for all Indian muslims? We Indians had a chance to forget the past and start from scratch as Indians after independence. We need not have scratched past wounds. The tit-for-tat violence will never end this way.
And Lol about UAE, in 2020 they started building one Hindu temple, that too because of the clout that Hindu India garners in the world today. Had it been congress, we would still be kneeling before those Arabic overlords.
So you see, we can get a temple built through peaceful means. No need to engage in violence and land grab for one. Modi would makes us believe that we started progressing only from 2014. I am not saying Congress is any better, but we have been putting a lot more blame on them then they are responsible for. And anyways, the issue is not Congress but BJP. BJP is the one in power, so it should be more responsible in its behavior.
Regarding Disha Ravi Joseph, you are naive. Read about sedition law, it is not about sedition against country but against the ruling dispensation. It applies to anyone who tries to bring about demise of ruling dispensation through propaganda. GOI is absolutely in it's right to invoke sedition.
So you know the law better than the court who scolded GOI for slapping sedition charges on Disha and released her? Will you now hand over the anti-national certificate to that judge?
CAA is not discriminatory and sure hell doesn't go against of spirit of constitution. Indian constitution allows for selection of classes on the basis of equality. This law applies to religiously persecuted minorities of islamic countries bordering India. How can muslims be religiously persecuted in islamic countries? Also how can one ignore partition based on religion, when our mother land was torn apart by separatist ideology of one community. They parted then and are not welcome now. You seem misguided and borderline naive.
We could have worded it as 'religiously persecuted minorities of countries bordering India'. Naming a particular religion makes the law go against the spirit of constitution.
Ahmedis are one example. They consider themselves muslims but they are religiously persecuted in muslim Pakistan.
I am less worried about who can come in but more worried about the signals we are giving to our Indian muslims. CAA coupled with NRC (and shoddy implementation of NRC at that) means that any common Indian muslim can be termed 'non-Indian', whereas any common Indian non-muslim always have a second chance of coming back through CAA even if they fall through NRC. Can you imagine where this will lead us to. It will effectively make Indian muslims feel like 2nd class citizens. How can we become a superpower if we start an internal war against 15% of our own population?
Hindutva is about people and culture of this land. It includes all religions. But If your religion is going to say that you have more affinity to a distant land than your own and have more sympathy towards your religious compatriots of other lands than security of your own country, then you are absolutely anti national. India is going to rise as a Phoenix and show the world the true meaning of secularism. Hindutva is different to Hinduism.
I have an issue with the term 'Hindutva'. We can respect our culture very well by the term 'Indian' or 'Bhartiya' or 'Hindustani'. By forcing the term 'Hindutva' down the throat of non-Hindus, we are alienating them.
Imagine if you are an American Hindu (eg. Tulsi Gabbard). You may make regular pilgrimage to India to visit Hindu holy sites, does it make you less patriotic American? What can muslims do if their pilgrimage sites are in Saudi Arabia? It does not make them any lesser Indians. Abdul Hamid (1965 war), Azim Premji (Wipro chairman and leading philanthropist), Abdul Kalam are no lesser Indians.