What's new

Decoding what U.S. wants from India

CONNAN

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
3,381
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
United States
Decoding what U.S. wants from India: The United States is looking for an economic and defence partnership, as well as to offset power of China

U.S. President Barack Obama will be the first American to be a chief guest at the Republic Day parade.

He will also be the first U.S. President to have visited India twice in his presidency.

There was a time when American presidential visits to India were few and far between.

24CC1BD200000578-2914779-image-a-63_1421540100817.jpg


+2
PM Narendra Modi has met U.S. President Barack Obama three times in just seven months — in the U.S. during the former’s official visit, at the East Asia Summit in Nay Pyi Taw and at the G-20 summit in Brisbane

But since Bill Clinton came to India in 1999, signaling a grand reconciliation after harshly punishing India for the May 1998 nuclear tests, American presidential visits have been regular.

In just seven months, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has met Obama three times — in the U.S. during the former’s official visit in September, at the East Asia Summit in Nay Pyi Taw and then later at the G-20 summit in Brisbane.

Despite interaction in a range of areas, and providing crucial assistance to India in its times of troubles, no American leader was ever invited as the chief guest at the Republic Day parade; a Chinese marshal and even two Pakistani leaders have figured in the guest list.

The Modi strategy is visible in the pattern of his foreign visits which has seen him develop strong ties with Japan and Australia, two key U.S. allies in East Asia.

The Japan visit, the first outside the subcontinent after he became PM, was notable for the display of the good chemistry between Modi and his Japanese counterpart Shinzu Abe, besides being successful in attracting Japanese investment and laying out the basis for a strategic partnership.
The Australian visit, too, clearly signalled a stepping up of the engagement between New Delhi and Canberra, an important U.S. military ally.
Reading between the lines of officials’ statements and those of itinerant think tankers, it is clear what the U.S. wants of India.

First, they seek a clear articulation of how Modi views the place of the United States in his scheme of things.

The Americans, for their part, have not hesitated to indicate that they are for an alliance with India.

Short of this, and perhaps more realistically, they want the closest possible partnership.
To this end, they say that they want to assist India to emerge as a major global power, a view first articulated by the Bush Administration in 2005.

It does not take a genius to understand why the U.S. wants this — India is the only country of its size which has the potential to offset the enormous geopolitical pull of a rising China.
And India is also a country with which the U.S. has no real conflict of interest, at least for the foreseeable future.



+2
U.S. President Barack Obama and his wife Michelle during a three-day visit to India in 2010
Previous Indian leaders like Manmohan Singh have waxed eloquent on the need for close Indo-U.S. ties, but they never quite spelt out their longer-term vision beyond the diplomatic niceties.
Of course, India wants technology, investment, people-to-people ties and so on.
But how does it see its relationship with the U.S. in strategic terms?
After all, it is not just the U.S. which wants to offset the Chinese pull, India, too faces the Chinese heat, even in its own South Asian region.
Second, the U.S. is looking for a sound economic partnership with India.
In today’s gloomy economic scenario, the only large economies that are managing to hold their head above water seem to be those of India, China and the U.S.

But for the full potential of the India-U.S. relationship to be exploited, there is need for some homework.
India needs to ease the terms of doing business in the country.

Modi and Arun Jaitley have repeatedly emphasised their intention of doing the needful, but for the moment, the investors are waiting and watching.

As it is, the Americans remain unhappy with issues relating to the nuclear liability act and intellectual property rights in India.

Third, the U.S. wants to step up its defence partnership with India.

During this visit, the two sides are likely to sign up for another 10 years on their framework agreement for the U.S.-India Defence relationship.

The crown jewel of this has been the Defence Trade and Technology and Initiative through which the two sides are trying to identify high-tech items for co-development and co-production.

Fourth, the Americans want India to come on board their push for a climate change treaty when the Climate Change Conference is held in Paris later this year.

After striking a deal with China, the Americans hope to pin down India in a bilateral deal. Obama is hoping to make this treaty the capstone of his administration.

To this end, the U.S. will offer India agreements in clean energy technology, as well as hold out the promise of making India eligible for U.S. oil and natural gas exports.

This is just a quick sketch of what is, of course, a much more complex and layered

Back in the year 2000, the then Prime Minister termed India and the U.S. as “natural allies”.

This formulation was reiterated by Modi in an interview during the campaign for the general elections and subsequently, as PM, he restated it in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal where he called the U.S. “our natural global partner”.

Through the Obama invitation, Modi has sent an important signal about the place of the U.S. in his scheme of things.
Obama is now virtually a lame-duck President of a country whose Parliament is controlled by the Opposition.

So Modi is viewing the visit on a longer perspective where he seeks to leverage the U.S. connection to attract technology and investment from the western world, as well as build ties to balance China.

The writer is a Contributing Editor, Mail Today

Divided over PAK

Pakistan remains the one issue which divides U.S. and India.

The American pullout from Afghanistan compounds the problem because of Indian fears that Pakistan could once again assume a dominant position in that country.

But while Obama seems determined to pull out American forces from there, the U.S. is exerting a great deal of diplomatic pressure to get Pakistan committed to a smooth transition in Afghanistan.

They do not want a chaotic Afghanistan to once again host terror groups like the al-Qaeda which target the U.S.
The carefully floated reports that Islamabad planned to ban the Haqqani network and Jamaat-ud-Dawa followed the recent visit of U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry to Pakistan.

This came in the aftermath of the horrific Peshawar U.S. President Barack Obama and his wife Michelle school massacre.


Read more:
Decoding what U.S. wants from India: The United States is looking for an economic and defence partnership, as well as to offset power of China | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
.
India and US are business just partners in terms of economy and defence, but not friend neither ally.
 
.
since when US Congress i.e. Senate and house of representatives became " Parliament " ?

Even if he becomes so called ' lame duck ' , US president remains the most powerful person on earth .


author is expected to know lil bit about American system before day dreaming about decoding American ' wants ' !
 
.
The biggest obstacle between an Indo-US alliance is Russia and our dependence upon it. This unfortunately means that India even if wants to, can never truly embrace the West and form alliances.
 
.
The biggest obstacle between an Indo-US alliance is Russia and our dependence upon it. This unfortunately means that India even if wants to, can never truly embrace the West and form alliances.

Incorrect .

Biggest obstacle between closer Indo-US relationship is India's independent foreign policy ...

This has hardly anything to do with Russia .

US will be only happy to have another horse in its stable ...on which it can ride the region and the world .

Believe me it is far better to have relationship with 'dignified' distance ...
 
.
Incorrect .

Biggest obstacle between closer Indo-US relationship is India's independent foreign policy ...

This has hardly anything to do with Russia .

US will be only happy to have another horse in its stable ...on which it can ride the region and the world .

Believe me it is far better to have relationship with 'dignified' distance ...

Spot on ,US government see's every other nation (except Israel may be) as a tool , and creates problem for other nations for its own (mostly corporate pay masters) personal gain.
 
.
Incorrect .

Biggest obstacle between closer Indo-US relationship is India's independent foreign policy ...

This has hardly anything to do with Russia .

US will be only happy to have another horse on which it can ride in its stable ...
India's independent foreign policy
That is the relic of an era long-past. India's 'non-aligned' policy would serve no purpose if we didn't have 2 poles - US vs SU, with whom we didn't have any inherent disputes. Today when Russia's global importance has tremendously and permanently declined and a new pole/adversary rises up north whose might might surpass both US and India combined, we need to shred this NAM thingy and ally with the Americanos. Independent FP isn't of much use today, but that is of of course invalidated if we are able to resolve all issues with China including its propping up of its proxy to our west - which looks highly unlikely.

US will be only happy to have another horse on which it can ride in its stable ...
But we aren't any other horse:)
Our GDP will be pretty close to theirs and even surpass it maybe:agree:
 
.
That is the relic of an era long-past. India's 'non-aligned' policy would serve no purpose if we didn't have 2 poles - US vs SU, with whom we didn't have any inherent disputes. Today when Russia's global importance has tremendously and permanently declined and a new pole/adversary rises up north whose might might surpass both US and India combined, we need to shred this NAM thingy and ally with the Americanos. Independent FP isn't of much use today, but that is of of course invalidated if we are able to resolve all issues with China including its propping up of its proxy to our west - which looks highly unlikely.


But we aren't any other horse:)
Our GDP will be pretty close to theirs and even surpass it maybe:agree:

I do hope we don't get trolled by US .
 
.
Spot on ,US government see's every other nation (except Israel may be) as a tool , and creates problem for other nations for its own (mostly corporate pay masters) personal gain.
And we are the most altruistic nation on the planet, helping everyone from Africa to ME with no concern for our personal benefit or loss.:rolleyes:
 
.
That is the relic of an era long-past. India's 'non-aligned' policy would serve no purpose if we didn't have 2 poles - US vs SU, with whom we didn't have any inherent disputes. Today when Russia's global importance has tremendously and permanently declined and a new pole/adversary rises up north whose might might surpass both US and India combined, we need to shred this NAM thingy and ally with the Americanos. Independent FP isn't of much use today, but that is of of course invalidated if we are able to resolve all issues with China including its propping up of its proxy to our west - which looks highly unlikely.

You are confusing between Non aligned policy and independent foreign policy - Both are quite different !!!
 
. .
And we are the most altruistic nation on the planet, helping everyone from Africa to ME with no concern for our personal benefit or loss.:rolleyes:

Every nation has to look out for its own personal interests , but doing so by destroying other nation (and its economy alongwith rest everything) is just pathetic .
 
.
But we aren't any other horse:)
Our GDP will be pretty close to theirs and even surpass it maybe:agree:

Our GDP is pretty close to theirs ???

since when ?

either you are joking or ....

We have long way to go to even match US let alone surpass them .
 
. .
Our GDP is pretty close to theirs ???

since when ?

either you are joking or ....

We have long way to go to even match US let alone surpass them .
Higher cost of living ≠ Higher GDP
 
.
Back
Top Bottom