What's new

Decline of Islamic Science

......

The important point for us modern day Muslims however is to learn how the early urban Muslims integrated Islam with pragmatism.l .
Meray piaray bhai jaan

What you just said is pure and simple myth. Islamic Mullahs and Ayatullahs never allowed "Integration of religion with anything but chaos and killing". Just look around now to learn more about Mullahtic and Ayatullahiitc behavior. Mullahs of today are perfect samples frozen in 800AD.

Please do some homework. Find out where the famous "Muslim scientists" were. most of them were as Muslim as Dr. Salam. And thus they all were Fatwa-ized quickly as heretics and non-Muslims, just like today.

This is why these scientists existed on the fringes of the geographical and socially outcast lands during most of the time during 800-1000AD. There were exceptions but far and few.




......
..... Medieval Europe were inspired and influenced by Ibn Rushd's commentary on Aristotle's work. The guy even features in the "school of athens" by Raphael .

Rushd was the last "hurrah" from the Middle East before Mullah Ghazali followers extinguished the flames of enquiry and questions and reason.

Please study for yourself. Put all the Muslims scientists in a spreadsheet. Put their place of birth and place of death in the same sheet. put the period (DOB and DOD). Sketch the distance from Makkah Madina.

you will then realize that Islamic Mullahs do not and never did allow science

So there never was that mythical integration you pointed out. Only Nasim Hijazi will spread such rumors and falsehoods.

All this info that I talk about is shining bright in all our eyes, and yet so many of us refuse to see it.

Sadly
 
.
Meray piaray bhai jaan

What you just said is pure and simple myth. Islamic Mullahs and Ayatullahs never allowed "Integration of religion with anything but chaos and killing". Just look around now to learn more about Mullahtic and Ayatullahiitc behavior. Mullahs of today are perfect samples frozen in 800AD.

Please do some homework. Find out where the famous "Muslim scientists" were. most of them were as Muslim as Dr. Salam. And thus they all were Fatwa-ized quickly as heretics and non-Muslims, just like today.

This is why these scientists existed on the fringes of the geographical and socially outcast lands during most of the time during 800-1000AD. There were exceptions but far and few.






Rushd was the last "hurrah" from the Middle East before Mullah Ghazali followers extinguished the flames of enquiry and questions and reason.

Please study for yourself. Put all the Muslims scientists in a spreadsheet. Put their place of birth and place of death in the same sheet. put the period (DOB and DOD). Sketch the distance from Makkah Madina.

you will then realize that Islamic Mullahs do not and never did allow science

So there never was that mythical integration you pointed out. Only Nasim Hijazi will spread such rumors and falsehoods.

All this info that I talk about is shining bright in all our eyes, and yet so many of us refuse to see it.

Sadly
Didn't pope use to fatwasize Christian scientists in the middle ages and in the reniassence era? Weren't there some great achievements of Muslim scientists, which you are trying to down play? What is the meaning of your argument "sketch distance of those scientists from Mekkah"? Are only Mekkans are Muslims or does Islam says that Muslims are only those who belong to Mekkah and Medina?
 
.
He is right, but there was one more factor, a final blow - the Mongol invasions, and the complete destruction of Baghdad. Science, arts, literature, almost every constructive human activity declined due to that.


Is there any relation whatsoever between a numeral system and resisting an invasion? Don't be so facile.


Much later, but yes.

The mongols set the Asian continent back several centuries. The scourge brought down the Song Dynasty when Chinese arts and culture flourished. Such savagery is not seen until the Japanese in ww2. Imagine a world when the Mongol scourge did not exist!
 
.
The mongols set the Asian continent back several centuries. The scourge brought down the Song Dynasty when Chinese arts and culture flourished. Such savagery is not seen until the Japanese in ww2. Imagine a world when the Mongol scourge did not exist!

Mongol were certainly a destructive force. No doubt about that.

But they can not be blamed for something that did not exist already. If there was no Mongol invasion, the only difference will be in history books and geopolitics. Not in sciences.

China too did not have any scientific tradition either. Much like the rest of Asia and Africa and pre-colonial America and Oceania.

Yes, there was art and supernaturals and military conquests. There was religion and some philosophy. But not science.

Science as we know it, is purely a European endeavor. Even largely today. Trying to say otherwise is pure BS and a big lie.
 
.
Didn't pope use to fatwasize Christian scientists in the middle ages and in the reniassence era? Weren't there some great achievements of Muslim scientists, which you are trying to down play? What is the meaning of your argument "sketch distance of those scientists from Mekkah"? Are only Mekkans are Muslims or does Islam says that Muslims are only those who belong to Mekkah and Medina?
It is like measuring the distance of places of learning from the Vatican.

Mongol were certainly a destructive force. No doubt about that.

But they can not be blamed for something that did not exist already. If there was no Mongol invasion, the only difference will be in history books and geopolitics. Not in sciences.

China too did not have any scientific tradition either. Much like the rest of Asia and Africa and pre-colonial America and Oceania.

Yes, there was art and supernaturals and military conquests. There was religion and some philosophy. But not science.

Science as we know it, is purely a European endeavor. Even largely today. Trying to say otherwise is pure BS and a big lie.
Amazing level of ignorance!

Even WikiPedia talks about science that existed outside Europe - Science - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
Didn't pope use to fatwasize Christian scientists in the middle ages and in the reniassence era? Weren't there some great achievements of Muslim scientists, which you are trying to down play? What is the meaning of your argument "sketch distance of those scientists from Mekkah"? Are only Mekkans are Muslims or does Islam says that Muslims are only those who belong to Mekkah and Medina?

Your reference to pope as a comparison is not entirely fair. Science has its roots in Greek thinking and later on was again rekindled by Church which had a overwhelming influence to set up Europe for enlightenment. There was ofcourse quite bloody inhouse fighting. But it was just that.

The disagreement between Church and later scientists was not personal. It was purely intellectual. People like Augustine of Hippo, Thomas Aquinas and Gregor Mendel who were instrumental in developing modern science, had come from the belly of the church itself.

The disagreement between Islamic establishment and scientists is purely personal. And it is often settled by invoking the Takfir with murderous results. Both for science and scientist.

It is like measuring the distance of places of learning from the Vatican.

Amazing level of ignorance!

Even WikiPedia talks about science that existed outside Europe - Science - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Coming from some one who does not accept evolution and claims to be a "molecular biologist". :lol:

Go sell your cookies somewhere else. :coffee:
 
.
Your reference to pope as a comparison is not entirely fair. Science has its roots in Greek thinking and later on was again rekindled by Church which had a overwhelming influence to set up Europe for enlightenment. There was ofcourse quite bloody inhouse fighting. But it was just that.

The disagreement between Church and later scientists was not personal. It was purely intellectual. People like Augustine of Hippo, Thomas Aquinas and Gregor Mendel who were instrumental in developing modern science, had come from the belly of the church itself.

The disagreement between Islamic establishment and scientists is purely personal. And it is often settled by invoking the Takfir with murderous results. Both for science and scientist.
I am not as knowledgeable on the topic as you but take the example of Gilelio for example, he was sentenced to house imprisonment by the Church even after he apologized to the church, you say that it was intellectual based sentence not personal then how is it any better than the fatwas of Muslim clerics?
 
.
Meray piaray bhai jaan

What you just said is pure and simple myth. Islamic Mullahs and Ayatullahs never allowed "Integration of religion with anything but chaos and killing". Just look around now to learn more about Mullahtic and Ayatullahiitc behavior. Mullahs of today are perfect samples frozen in 800AD.

Ibn e Sina was a Hafiz but analyzed, criticized and studied Aristotle extensively. Ibn e Khaldun was a Hafiz yet talks about the science of logic in Al Muqaddimah regularly referring to the Ancient Greeks/Aristotle (I have already put the link to Al Muqaddimah in a previous post). Surely as men raised in Madrassas, with religious eductional backgrounds they shouldn't have been reading the philosophical works of Pagans? Yet they did this. The Abbasiya Khalifas, the Amir e Momineen of the Ummah heavily patronized the Mu'tazila school of thought which emphasized rationality and logic in faith (Mu`tazila - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do some homework. Find out where the famous "Muslim scientists" were. most of them were as Muslim as Dr. Salam. And thus they all were Fatwa-ized quickly as heretics and non-Muslims, just like today.

This is why these scientists existed on the fringes of the geographical and socially outcast lands during most of the time during 800-1000AD. There were exceptions but far and few.

To be perfectly honest and I say this wanting to be as respectful as possible but on the contrary you need to do some homework. Baghdad was the heart of the Islamic world. It is where the Caliph sat. It is where the Islamic army was based and it is also where the Bayt al Hikma was. Attending this educational institute were men like Al Khwarizmi (father of Algebra), Al Kindi (argued for synthesis between Greek philosophy and Islam), A Sindhi named Ibn Ali who introduced the decimal fractions to the Islamic world etc. These scientists/philisophers were not living on the "fringes" of the Muslim world. On the contrary they were living at the heart of the Islamic world.
 
.
I am not as knowledgeable on the topic as you but take the example of Gilelio for example, he was sentenced to house imprisonment by the Church even after he apologized to the church, you say that it was intellectual based sentence not personal then how is it any better than the fatwas of Muslim clerics?

That is another example of inhouse fighting. He was sentenced for doubting the earlier Greek Geocentric world view (another European idea) and the bible's views on it. But that sentence was mild. He was not condemned to die a horrible death. He was not Takfir-ed. Or condemned to eternal hell.

In Muslim lands, an example would have been made of such a person. Not for a specific point in his intellectual finding as was the case of Galileo but because this person had tried to question the nature of the NATURE.

Church did alot of horrible things. But it also did promote knowledge and inquiry though not always was comfortable with the results this inquiry produced. Islamic establishment by comparison was not interested in knowledge and inquiry to begin with. One main reason for this, being the "belief" among Muslims that all knowledge is in Quran. Literally.

This then does not leave any room for any other knowledge. Church did not have the same view. Already there were many versions of Bible and scripture.
 
.
Coming from some one who does not accept evolution and claims to be a "molecular biologist". :lol:

Go sell your cookies somewhere else. :coffee:
Yes, it is coming from someone who does not accept evolution (this is your interpretation though) and indeed claims to be a "Molecular Biologist", because he is one. Moreover, unlike you and many of his countrymen, he is not having any complex of being a Muslim, for he is well-aware of Muslim's achievements in Science.

Following is an article published in a peer reviewed journal '
The FASEB Journal' that has an impact factor of 5.480 (please google to find out what it means).

If there is little self-respect remained in you, you must apologize for your disgusting and totally uncalled for comments.


Arab science in the golden age (750–1258 C.E.) and today

Matthew E. Falagas*,†,1, Effie A. Zarkadoulia* and George Samonis‡

Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), Athens, Greece;
†Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; and
‡Department of Medicine, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
↵Correspondence: 1Correspondence: Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), 9 Neapoleos St., Marousi 15123, Greece. E-mail: m.falagas@aibs.gr

The arab world covers a vast geographic area, comprising many different countries in Asia and Africa. The contemporary world owes much of its progress in all fields of human intellectual activity, including medicine, to Arabic culture, especially the advancements made during the Golden Age of Arabic-Islamic science (8th to 13th centuries C.E.). The glorious historic background of the Arabic world permits us to identify the debt that humanity owes to the Golden Age of Arabic science and to evaluate the research contributions made by Arab countries to biomedical sciences in our own day.

THE GOLDEN AGE OF ARAB SCIENCE

The biomedical sciences of the Arabic-Islamic world underwent remarkable development during the 8th to 13th centuries C.E., a flowering of knowledge and intellect that later spread throughout Europe and greatly influenced both medical practice and education. The scientific glory of the Arabic nation originated on the Arabian Peninsula in the 7th century C.E., where the preaching of the prophet Mohammed united the Arab tribes and inaugurated the Muslim religion (1)⇓ . The Islamic state was formed in 622 C.E., when the Prophet moved from Mecca to Medina. Within a century after his death (632 C.E.) a large part of the planet, from southern Europe throughout North Africa to Central Asia and on to India, was controlled by and/or influenced by the new Arabic-Muslim Empire (1⇓ , 2)⇓ . In 711 C.E., Arab Muslims invaded southern Spain and a center of flourishing civilization (al-Andalus) was created (1)⇓ . Another center emerged in Baghdad from the Abbasids, who ruled part of the Islamic world during a historic period later characterized as the “Golden Age” (∼750 to 1258 C.E.) (3)⇓ .

Arguably, many of the achievements of the Islamic-Arabic Golden Age were based on previous initiatives taken by the ancient Egyptians, Hebrews, Persians, Greeks, and Romans (1⇓ , 2⇓ , 4)⇓ . Hence, translators were invited to Baghdad, where scientists and researchers studied the past and created the future. The result of their work was impressive progress in all sectors of science. The rulers of Islamic Spain, in an attempt to surpass Baghdad, recruited scholars who made contributions of paramount importance to science, medicine, technology, philosophy, and art.

WHAT LED TO THE GOLDEN AGE?

“The Golden Age” was based on several factors (5)⇓ . Muslims following the guidelines of the Prophet studied and searched for knowledge (1⇓ , 5⇓ , 6)⇓ . The Quran is clear: “The scholar’s ink is more sacred than the blood of martyrs”, while the Prophet promoted medical research preaching that “For every disease, Allah has given a cure.” (5)⇓ Communication became easier because the Muslim Empire united extensive geographic areas. Scholars travelled to teach or share ideas. Furthermore, the Arabic language became a unifying factor (4⇓ , 5)⇓ . Translations from Greek, Latin, and Chinese into Arabic were innumerable, thus removing language barriers for scholars. During the same period, Arabs learned from the Chinese how to produce paper and books became more available (5)⇓ . Libraries were established in Cairo, Aleppo, Baghdad, and urban centers in Iran, central Asia, and Spain, while bookshops with thousands of titles opened in several cities (4⇓ , 5)⇓ . Finally, The House of Wisdom, an academic institution serving as a university, was established in Baghdad in 1004 C.E. (5)⇓ .

ISLAMIC MEDICINE

During that period, Islamic medicine went through impressive developments, which later influenced medical education and practice in Europe (1⇓ , 2)⇓ . Intense efforts for translation and analysis of the works of Hippocrates, Rufus of Ephesus, Dioscurides, and Galen took place (1⇓ , 2)⇓ . Arab scholars synthesized and further elaborated the knowledge they had gathered from ancient manuscripts, adding their own experience. Numerous Arab pioneers are mentioned in medical history. Among the most famous are: Yuhanna ibn Massuwayh who performed dissections and described allergy (4⇓ , 7)⇓ ; Abu Bakr Muhummad ibn Zakariyya ar-Razi (Rhazes) who differentiated smallpox from measles, described the laryngeal branch of the recurrent nerve, introduced mercurial ointments and hot moist compresses in surgery, investigated psychosomatic reactions, and wrote the famous Al-Hawi, a medical encyclopedia of 30 volumes (4⇓ , 7)⇓ ; Az-Zahrawi (Abulcasis), known as the father of surgery, who performed tracheotomy and lithotomy, introduced the use of cotton and catgut, and described extra-uterine pregnancy, cancer of the breast, and the sex-linked inheritance of hemophilia (4⇓ , 7)⇓ ; Ibn Sina (Avicenna) who differentiated meningitis from other neurologic diseases, described anthrax and tuberculosis, introduced urethral drug instillation, stressed the importance of hygiene, and dietetics, and the holistic approach to the patient [his work al-Qanun fil Tibb (The Canon of Medicine), represented the absolute authority in medicine for 500 years (4⇓ , 7)⇓ ]; Ibn-Zuhr (Avenzoar) who described pericarditis, mediastinitis, and paralysis of the pharynx, and who pointed out the importance of drugs for body and soul (4⇓ , 7)⇓ ; and Ibn-Nafis who studied and described pulmonary circulation (4⇓ , 7)⇓ .

Progress was apparent in all medical fields, including anatomy, surgery, anaesthesia, cardiology, ophthalmology, orthopaedics, bacteriology, urology, obstetrics, neurology, psychiatry (including psychotherapy), hygiene, dietetics, and dentistry (1⇓ , 4⇓ , 7)⇓ .

EDUCATION, HOSPITALS, AND SCIENCE

In that era, a thorough system of medical education was created in the Arab-Muslim world (1⇓ , 4)⇓ . Arabic medical studies consisted of initial training in such basic sciences as alchemy, pharmacognosy, anatomy, and physiology, which was followed by clinical training in hospitals, where students performed physical examinations, attended ward rounds, and clinical lectures (1⇓ , 2)⇓ . Upon completion of training, future physicians were required to pass oral and practical exams in order to be licensed. Medicine was not only a profession or science, but also a philosophical attitude based upon religion and culture, obeying codes of ethics characterizing the physician’s behavior and obligations to patients, colleagues, and the community (4)⇓ .

At the same time, secular hospitals (Bimaristans), developed all over the Arab world (1)⇓ . These were well-organized institutions, run under specific regulations and directed by physicians (1⇓ , 2)⇓ . No sexual, religious, social, or economic discrimination interfered with patients’ treatment (1). Detailed medical records were kept (1)⇓ . These hospitals were adequately equipped, and had both inpatient and outpatient units (1⇓ , 2)⇓ . Small, mobile hospital units were also created to serve distant areas and battle fields (1)⇓ . The first known hospital was established in Damascus in 706 C.E., while the most important one, located in Baghdad, was established in 982 C.E. (2)⇓ .

Along with progress in medicine, there were remarkable developments in pharmacology (1⇓ , 2)⇓ . In the 9th century C.E., manuscripts of Dioscurides and Galen translated from Greek formed the basis of further understanding. Arab scholars became acquainted with herbs, experimented with anesthetics, developed techniques such as distillation, crystallization, solution, and calcinations (1⇓ , 2)⇓ and introduced new drugs such as camphor, senna, musk, alum, sandalwood, ambergris, mercury, aloes, and aconite. They also developed syrups and juleps, created flavoring extracts made of rose water, orange or lemon peel, and experimented with poisons and antidotes (1⇓ , 2⇓ , 4)⇓ . The most famous manual was The Comprehensive Book on Materia Medica and Foodstuffs, an alphabetical guide to over 1400 simples, written by Ibn al-Baytar (2)⇓ . The first pharmacies were established in Baghdad in 754 C.E. In the 12th century C.E., pharmacology was differentiated from medicine and alchemy and became an independent discipline (1)⇓ . The impact of Arabic pharmacology in Europe was tremendous for centuries. Terms used in everyday pharmacy and chemistry such as drug, alkali, alcohol, elixir, aldehydes, etc., are derived from the Arabic (1)⇓ .

Advances in medical sciences were not an isolated phenomenon. Astonishing progress was made in astronomy, mathematics, chemistry, and other fields of science (1⇓ , 6⇓ , 8)⇓ . Prominent astronomers were Ibn Firnas, who constructed a planetarium and reputedly was the first man to fly; Al-Zarqali, who created a kind of astrolabe for measuring the motion of the stars; Al-Bitruji, who studied stellar movements; Al-Fargani, who wrote the Elements on Astronomy; and al-Sufi, who described the Andromeda galaxy. Mathematics was closely linked to astronomy and almost every mathematician was also an astronomer (8)⇓ . Arithmetic, algebra, geometry, and trigonometry flourished. Famous geometricians were Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, who first translated Euclid’s Elements; and Muhammad and Hasan Banu Musa, who wrote books on the measurement of the sphere and trisection of angles and who discovered kinematical methods of drawing ellipses (8)⇓ . Among arithmeticians and algebraists, al-Khwarazmi was considered the greatest. He obtained data from Greeks and Hindus and transmitted arithmetical and algebraic knowledge, which exerted great influence upon medieval mathematics (8)⇓ . Finally, trigonometry was developed along with astronomy with important representatives such as Ahmad al-Nahawandi, Al-Khwarizmi, Habash al-Hasib, Yahya ibn abi Mansur, and Sanad ibn Ali (8)⇓ . In the field of chemistry, Jabir Ibn Haiyan introduced the meaning of experimentation, leading from alchemy to modern chemistry.

Additionally, the Golden Age was characterized by technological, architectural, and artistic achievements (Figs. 1⇓ and 2)⇓ . Methods for irrigation including underground channels, windmills, and waterwheels were some of the Arabic inventions (6⇓ , 9)⇓ , while even today Arab architectural miracles and unique objects of art can be admired in many countries, with many of the best examples in southern Spain.

Figure 1 & 2.jpg


Unfortunately, decline is an historical phenomenon observed in all times and cultures, and the Arabic-Islamic world was no exception. From the 9th century C.E., several provinces had already started to fall away from Abbasid control and in the next four centuries the political power of the Empire was dispersed among new independent states (6)⇓ . Around the 12th century C.E., the Abbasid Empire became weak, marking the beginning of the end (1⇓ , 9)⇓ . Turks played a major role. Turkish soldiers, who first reinforced the Empire after 861 C.E., undermined the central authority (6)⇓ . While the Abbasid Caliphate was disintegrating, the Seljuk Caliphate was beginning in 1057 C.E. By then the Empire had lost unity and power due to religious differences, charges of heresy, and assassinations. Along with the internal pressures, the European Crusades (1097–1291 C.E.) further weakened the Muslim Empire (9)⇓ . Finally, in 1236, Cordoba fell to Spanish Christians (5)⇓ and in 1258, Baghdad fell to Mongols (1⇓ , 5)⇓ .

ARAB SCIENCE TODAY

To document the contributions of Arab countries to science today, we performed a bibliometric evaluation of the current biomedical research productivity in Arab countries, updating the relevant literature (10⇓ , 11)⇓ by analyzing data of the last decade and expanding on the issue with the use of various methods of measuring research output and the inclusion of more Arab countries. Although bibliometric analyses have several limitations, such as the inclusion of only a proportion of journals in indexing databases (12⇓ , 13)⇓ , the results of our study offer useful data about the biomedical research productivity in Arab countries during the last decade. The research productivity of 23 Arab countries was evaluated by three different methods. First, by using the PubMed search engine, we identified the number of biomedical articles in which the first author’s address was in one of the Arab countries for the period 1994–2003. We used a methodology similar to other bibliometric studies performed by our group (14)⇓ .

In addition, the total number of articles originating from all Arab countries was calculated and compared with worldwide productivity. This method included the use of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Essential Science Indicators (ESI) database. The ESI database provides science trends and statistical information derived from other ISI databases. At the time of our analysis (April 2005) a total of 4941 journals were included in the ESI database and were categorized into 22 broad scientific fields for the 10-year period 1995–2004. We focused our search on nine biomedical scientific fields: biology and biochemistry, clinical medicine, immunology, microbiology, molecular biology and genetics, multidisciplinary, neuroscience and behavior, psychiatry / psychology, and pharmacology and toxicology. Data in the ESI database is organized in various ways, including national rankings for research productivity in the above scientific fields. Thus, data pertaining to the total number of publications, total number of citations, as well as to the number of citations per paper for the examined 10-year period, was collected and evaluated for each of the 23 Arab countries. Some Arab countries did not have data in the ESI rankings because they did not pass the needed cumulative citation count threshold as set by ESI.

We also evaluated articles published in the top 50 clinical medicine journals as categorized in the ESI database, sorted on the basis of the number of citations per paper. Then, by making use of the ISI Web of Science “advanced search” tool, we identified articles in these journals in which at least one author had an address in an Arab country. We analyzed data on original articles only, excluding publication types such as letters, editorials, and news items. In order to adjust for confounders that affect research productivity, the average population and gross domestic product (GDP) for each country during the study period were calculated from data obtained from the online World Bank databases (15)⇓ .

Raw and adjusted indicators for the biomedical research productivity of the Arab world during the last 10 years are shown in Table 1⇓ . The last two columns present data adjusted for population size and GDP. Researchers from Saudi Arabia published the largest number of articles. However, when adjustments for population and GDP were made, Kuwait and Jordan, respectively, were the most productive. Looking at the cumulative indices of scientific production of the Arab countries, one may notice that although the population of these countries represented 4.6% of the global population and had 1.4% of the global GDP during the study period, they produced 0.5% of the biomedical research indexed in the PubMed database and 0.1% of the articles published in the top 50 clinical medicine journals. Only 30 articles from those published in the top 50 clinical medicine journals during the period 1994–2004 originated exclusively from Arab countries, whereas in 254 others there was also participation of authors from non-Arab countries [in 146, authors from the USA; and in 112, authors from Western Europe (there were co-authors from the USA, Western Europe, and Arab countries in some papers)].

Table 1.JPG


Table 1 a.JPG


Most Arab countries located in the African continent produced less research, in absolute or adjusted numbers, than the majority of non-African Arab countries. Although researchers from Egypt and Morocco published a relatively large number of papers and received a good number of citations compared to researchers from other Arab countries, they ranked lower when the data for research productivity were adjusted for population and GDP.

Data regarding the number of articles indexed in PubMed, in which the first author’s address was in an Arab country, for the years 1994–2003 are presented in Table 2⇓ . As shown, there was a continuous increase in the number of articles originating from Arab countries. In 1994 these articles represented 0.4% of the total articles indexed in PubMed, whereas this figure was 0.6% for 2003.

Table 2.JPG


ON TO THE FUTURE

Biomedical research is important not only because of its direct significance for the health and well being of humans, but also because of the great economic advantages it affords. We are persuaded that the scientific community as well as the public and private funding organizations of Arab countries share the responsibility of increasing the funding for biomedical research and for improving the research infrastructure of each Arab country. Also, increased collaboration between Arab countries and their neighbours will offer a considerable benefit to those involved. Moreover, wealthy nations and regions, such as the USA and Europe, have the responsibility to assist Arab countries in their efforts to increase research productivity. This may be accomplished by incorporating well-trained Arab scientists in international research networks, and by helping them to stay in their home countries, thus increasing the local research productivity. Arabs have a long history of contribution to science, especially during the Arabic-Islamic Golden Age. However, political, social and economic problems have hampered scientists in Arab countries, making is difficult to optimize their capacity in research productivity in most scientific fields.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ioannis A. Bliziotis, M.D. and Evi Papastamataki, R.N. for their help with data collection and analysis and Elpis Mantadakis, M.D. for reviewing the manuscript. M.E.F designed the study, supervised data collection and analysis, and wrote the bibliometric part of the paper. E.A.Z. and G.S. wrote the part of the paper regarding the Islamic Golden Age. M.E.F. is guarantor.

Footnotes

The opinions expressed in editorials, essays, letters to the editor, and other articles comprising the Up Front section are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FASEB or its constituent societies. The FASEB Journal welcomes all points of view and many voices. We look forward to hearing these in the form of op-ed pieces and/or letters from its readers addressed to journals@faseb.org

References

1.
Syed, I. B. () Islamic Medicine: 1000 years ahead of its times. Athar, S. eds. Islamic Medicine www.islam-usa.com/im4.html. Accessed January 12, 2006.
2. National Library of Medicine (1998) Medieval Islamic Medicine. Islamic Culture and the Medical Arts Islamic Culture and the Medical Arts: Medieval Islamic Medicine Accessed January 12, 2006.
3. Oswego City School District Regents Exam Prep Center () Golden Age of Islam www.regentsprep.org/Regents/global/themes/goldenages/islam.cfm. Accessed January 12, 2006.
4. Haddad, F. S. (1993) Arab contribution to medicine. Bull. Soc. Liban. Hist. Med. 1,21-33
5. Horace Mann Academic Middle School () Science and Culture in Medieval Islamic Cultures: Part 1 www.sfusd.k12.ca.us/schwww/sch618/ScienceMath/Science_and_Math.html. Accessed on January 6, 2006
6. IslamiCity.com () The Golden Age. Islam and Islamic History in Arabia and The Middle East Islamic History in Arabia and Middle East Accessed January 6, 2006.
7. Haddad, F.S. (1993) Pioneers of Arabian medicine. Bull. Soc. Liban. Hist. Med. 3,74-83
8. Ead, H. A. eds. History of Islamic Science 2 History of Islamic Science 2 Accessed January 11, 2006.
9. Horace Mann Academic Middle School () Science and Culture in Medieval Islamic Cultures: Part 4 www.sfusd.k12.ca.us/schwww/sch618/ScienceMath/Science_and_Math.html. Accessed on January 6, 2006
10. Shaban, S. F., Abu-Zidan, F. M. (2003) A quantitative analysis of medical publications from Arab countries. Saudi Med. J. 24,294-296 Medline
11. Tadmouri, G. O., Bissar-Tadmouri, N. A (2004) Major pitfall in the search strategy on PubMed. Saudi Med. J. 25,7-10 Medline
12. Zetterstrom, R. (2002) Bibliometric data: a disaster for many non-American biomedical journals. Acta Paediatr. 91,1020-1024 CrossRef
Medline
13. Soteriades, E. S., Falagas, M. E. (2005) An analysis of the geography of biomedical research in the European Union. BMJ 331,192-194
14. Bliziotis, I. A., Paraschakis, K., Vergidis, P. I., Karavasiou, A. I., Falagas, M. E. (2005) Worldwide trends in quantity and quality of published articles in the field of Infectious Diseases. BMC Infect. Dis. 5,16 CrossRef
Medline
15. The World Bank (2004) World Development Indicators 2002 (CD-Rom Edition) World Bank Bank Publications

Full text: Arab science in the golden age (750–1258 C.E.) and today
Pdf link: Arab science in the golden age (750–1258 C.E.) and today
 
Last edited:
.
I am not as knowledgeable on the topic as you but take the example of Gilelio for example, he was sentenced to house imprisonment by the Church even after he apologized to the church, you say that it was intellectual based sentence not personal then how is it any better than the fatwas of Muslim clerics?
The difference is that that happened in the 15th century, before the age of reason and enlightenment in Europe. Muslim clerics of today issue ridiculous fatwas, and propogate anti scientific mindset and thinking.

Also, secularism - ie, seperation of church and state - also helped. Popes or bishops could no longer make laws or imprison people.
 
.
That is another example of inhouse fighting. He was sentenced for doubting the earlier Greek Geocentric world view (another European idea) and the bible's views on it. But that sentence was mild. He was not condemned to die a horrible death. He was not Takfir-ed. Or condemned to eternal hell.

In Muslim lands, an example would have been made of such a person. Not for a specific point in his intellectual finding as was the case of Galileo but because this person had tried to question the nature of the NATURE.

Church did alot of horrible things. But it also did promote knowledge and inquiry though not always was comfortable with the results this inquiry produced. Islamic establishment by comparison was not interested in knowledge and inquiry to begin with. One main reason for this, being the "belief" among Muslims that all knowledge is in Quran. Literally.

This then does not leave any room for any other knowledge. Church did not have the same view. Already there were many versions of Bible and scripture.
You are trying to show the soft face of the Church while ignoring the blunt face. No doubt that our clerics did much worse but the Church was no better. It was anti science and even at times anti logic ( witch burning, cat killing in England , sentencing scientists to death etc) But why ignore revolutions in chemistry and surgery by Muslim scientists?

The difference is that that happened in the 15th century, before the age of reason and enlightenment in Europe. Muslim clerics of today issue ridiculous fatwas, and propogate anti scientific mindset and thinking.

Also, secularism - ie, seperation of church and state - also helped. Popes or bishops could no longer make laws or imprison people.
Agreed. I was referring to the post of fauj historian.
 
.
That is another example of inhouse fighting. He was sentenced for doubting the earlier Greek Geocentric world view (another European idea) and the bible's views on it. But that sentence was mild. He was not condemned to die a horrible death. He was not Takfir-ed. Or condemned to eternal hell.
Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake for espousing helocentricism. Not to mention plenty of "witches" who were tortured to death.

Christianity has a dark past, and there is a reason those times were called dark ages. But since the 16th century, since christianity was divorced from the affairs of the state, christian countries forged ahead.
 
.
You are trying to show the soft face of the Church while ignoring the blunt face. No doubt that our clerics did much worse but the Church was no better. It was anti science and even at times anti logic ( witch burning, cat killing in England , sentencing scientists to death etc) But why ignore revolutions in chemistry and surgery by Muslim scientists?

Soft or hard does not matter. What matters is progress happened in domain of church and not under Islamic establishment. At the end who makes progress wins.

Which revolutions you are talking about? Did they discover atom? Did they discover elemental system of chemistry? Much myths have been made about "advances" of Muslim scientists of that era. But the truth is, it is not worth much. Even if they had done nothing, the world would not have missed them. All they were doing is translating and borrowing from earlier Greeks and edit it abit. Whether in astronomy or in medicine or else where.

The systemic analysis of nature and its laws were done by non-Muslims in Europe. Whether in pre-Islamic period or after Islam.

Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake for espousing helocentricism. Not to mention plenty of "witches" who were tortured to death.

Christianity has a dark past, and there is a reason those times were called dark ages. But since the 16th century, since christianity was divorced from the affairs of the state, christian countries forged ahead.

Yes, it is indeed the case. But by COMPARISON, things were much better under Christianity. And this allowed sustained progress.
 
.
Pathetic attempt coming from some one who claims to be a "molecular biologist" and does not accept evolution.

No surprise in that.

That paper you have copy pasted is worthless since it does not tally with reality both present and past. It is not even scientific. It is a pseudo-scientific advertisement attempt.

A paper with "Arab Science Today" as its subheading, is rather ridiculous to even read.

Next time bring something less ridiculous to argue your POV.
Great. A paper published in peer reviewed FASEB, a journal with an impact factor of 5.840 is ridiculous, because you say so. Better was not expected from you.

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom