Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yes right,We are incapable( for more than two decades) to kill him ;till now Pakistan not handover him to us . In that situation better close that case or forgive him.
Yea right. Nice moaning. Because Dawood has been on the run for 20 years now.......and so many elections happened, each time Indians come out as fools.
India does not have balls to invite top chief in Delhi...that's why they have opened numerous consulates all along the pakistani border to facilitate him and his associates at their door steps.
Looks like mr brothers in arms retired from the state dept. with Indian origin..HunHun
Western intelligence and your raw behind loads of the things in Pakistan....so what's new in it.
Really? And he struts around making business deals and attending weddings and parties and yet not a single photograph of him in Karachi has surfaced?Its not a breaking news....
Everybody knows where he stays.
Really? And he struts around making business deals and attending weddings and parties and yet not a single photograph of him in Karachi has surfaced?
Pakistan was instrumental in obtaining intelligence on OBL's courier who was eventually used to track down OBL's location, something that the US is now also admitting:Don't forget how Pakistanis used to mock US about the presence of OBL in Pakistan. Sooner or later he will also be found in Pakistan.
I'd like some more credible evidence than these standard inane Indian government and media allegations that surface from time to time.What wonderful things might be expected if a single photograph of him in Karachi surfaces? Of all people, you, arguing in this vein? O tempora, O mores...
I am also telling them to do thisTo all the indian's, if you like to get dawood and know where is he, why don't ur all powerful military/ intel agencies do a covert op and take him from pak, lets give it a try.....
The ridiculous implication behind your comment is that somehow the 'biggest residential buildings around certain government structures should automatically become suspicious'. Nothing, in terms of the architecture of the OBL's residence in Abbottabad' was suspicious given the trend in Pakistan by conservative families to build high walls and maintain privacy.Whoa! you think OBL getting killed in Pakistan and living in the biggest building in the area, a short distance from your West point was a conspiracy?
Pakistan was instrumental in obtaining intelligence on OBL's courier who was eventually used to track down OBL's location, something that the US is now also admitting:
A footnote on page 399 of the Senate report says al-Baluchi was arrested along with another al-Qaeda operative, Khallad bin Attash, by Pakistani authorities on April 29, 2003. “Upon his arrest in Pakistan, Ammar al-Baluchi was cooperative and provided information on a number of topics to foreign government interrogators, including information on Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti that the CIA disseminated prior to al-Baluchi being transferred to CIA custody,” the footnote says.
Senate CIA Report Makes Case Torture Worked in Pakistan - Bloomberg View
I'd like some more credible evidence than these standard inane Indian government and media allegations that surface from time to time.
And quite frankly I thought the same thing, why were you of all people speaking out in support of such unsubstantiated nonsense.
The ridiculous implication behind your comment is that somehow the 'biggest residential buildings around certain government structures should automatically become suspicious'(1). Nothing, in terms of the architecture of the OBL's residence in Abbottabad' was suspicious given the trend in Pakistan by conservative families to build high walls and maintain privacy.
And as I pointed out in my earlier post, the US is now in fact admitting that the initial intelligence on OBL's courier (Al Kuwaiti) in fact came from Pakistan. It is the US that cut Pakistan out of the loop after that point in terms of developing that intelligence further and tracking OBL down - critical intelligence was hidden from Pakistan, not the other way around. (2)
Something more than the usual media and Indian government utterances.Right. Define credible evidence.
Then images/video of DI at all these events should certainly not be hard to provide, especially in today's age of cameras in phones and various other devices. And regular international travel especially is something that cannot go unnoticed for long.I, for one, am totally convinced that he spends his time in Pakistan and in the UAE. He is well integrated into Pakistani society, his family has married people from families not entirely unknown, and there are enough published and public reports from foreign intelligence agencies about his intermittent presence.
OBL was the US's fault, as I pointed out above - Pakistan obtained intelligence on the OBL's courier and the US cut Pakistan out of the process, so Pakistan cannot be blamed if she was misled by the US on the single strongest source of information that led to OBL's location.Why must we drag it down into the OBL kind of 'Yes he is', 'No he isn't' kind of brawl? So tell me, while my sunny mood from a successful visit to the dentist continues to cast its rays around, what will convince you? A personal meeting and an autograph? I really wonder.
Something more than the usual media and Indian government utterances.
Then images/video of DI at all these events should certainly not be hard to provide, especially in today's age of cameras in phones and various other devices. And regular international travel especially is something that cannot go unnoticed for long.
The only thing we have in terms of "public and published reports" are the usual regurgitation of unsubstantiated Indian allegations that DI is in Pakistan.
OBL was the US's fault, as I pointed out above - Pakistan obtained intelligence on the OBL's courier and the US cut Pakistan out of the process, so Pakistan cannot be blamed if she was misled by the US on the single strongest source of information that led to OBL's location.
It is not over-reach, that is exactly what was implied and you have continued that in your comments below.Isn't that over-reach? Who said that?
What 'support and succor'? The man never left the compound and lived a hermit's life inside with no access to the internet even. 'Support and succor' from the military would have at least allowed him to move around (locally) from time to time to 'stretch his legs'.The statement that the poor guy made was that surely his presence there was more than a bit curious. He could have been hiding in a hundred other places, I presume less marked by a military presence, unless the military presence is universal. How come he was found so close to support and succour from services sources?
Without even an iota of credible evidence to back it up it is exactly that - a conspiracy theory.I agree that this itself might sound to unfriendly ears like a conspiracy theory.