What's new

Dassault Rafale, tender | News & Discussions

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Typhoon enjoys a reputation within the IAF of being possibly the most modern and advanced fourth-generation fighter jet flying today. Its multiple unofficial ground and flight demonstrations to IAF pilots have won it unofficial accolades for being a blisteringly good aircraft to fly, with a phenomenal amount of research clearly devoted to technology aimed at staving off the effects of G forces. Pilots believe the Typhoon's airframe is built with beyond visual range combat in mind, even though it demonstrates awesomely tight performance in close-combat drills. The next-generation Meteor beyond visual range air to air missile (BVRAAM) is a valuable standard on the aircraft when its ready. The Eurojet EJ200 turbofan engine's possible selection for the LCA Tejas re-engine programme could provide an enormous fillip to the Typhoon's chances in the MMRCA, considering that those engines will be built under full technology transfer separately in India by HAL. EADS/BAE/Alenia Aeronautica are understood to have provided one of the most comprehensive offset and technology transfer offers in the sweepstakes.

WEAKNESSES

Like the Rafale and the Super Hornet, the Typhoon is a heavy-class twin-engined fighter, which immediately pulls the notches up on ownership cost, maintenance investments and turnaround. But the single most operational weakness (even though it may really be just perception) is that the IAF remains unconvinced of the Typhoon as a true multirole fighter plane. This may have something to do with the Eurofighter's slapdash external pod-based air-to-ground capability declaration for the Singapore Air Force fighter competition, though the IAF is itself of the opinion that the Typhoon is not a true strike fighter, built more as an air superiority and air defense platform, with an unproven, somewhat ad-hoc capability for stand-off interdiction, which is a critical, overriding operational QR in the MMRCA tender document. The stink over the Al Yamama contract with the Saudi government, and an alleged slush fund by BAE Systems for the sheiks could prove to be a real downer for the Typhoon, especially since BAE is the counter at which the Indian government will deal if it chooses the Typhoon. The fact that the government has recently awarded BAE with the Hawk AJT deal -- despite a significant quarter shouting out about kickbacks -- could also go against the Typhoon. The Typhoon is also weak on operational provenness, though the IAF is willing to look beyond that, considering how young the fighter is compared to some of the others.

LiveFist: MMRCA Part 6 - The Typhoon Truth
 
Boeing eyes $10 bn Indian contract with Super Hornet

Sun, Jul 12 10:56 AM

St Louis (Missouri), July 12 (IANS) As the race to supply the Indian Air Force with 126 Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MRCA) hots up, Boeing, a leading contender, is showcasing the Super Hornet, promising a new generation of air power.

Eying the over $10 billion contract with India and other high value deals, Boeing last week ceremonially rolled out the first of 24 F/A-18F Block II Super Hornets for the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF), its first international Super Hornet customer.

'The Super Hornet is on its way to delivering advanced combat capabilities to the Royal Australian Air Force,' said Bob Gower, Boeing vice president of F/A-18 and EA-18 programmes, at a ceremony at Boeing Integrated Defence Systems' production facilities here, watched by international media.

The remaining 23 Super Hornets, each equipped with the Raytheon-built APG-79 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, will be delivered to the RAAF in 2010 and 2011.

'The RAAF Super Hornet will bring a new generation of air power to Australia,' said Air Marshal Mark Binskin, chief of RAAF. 'Its advanced, networked weapons system will deliver enhanced air combat capability across the spectrum of air-to-air, strategic land attack and maritime strike.'

The Block II F/A-18E/F Super Hornet is the only 21st century, true multi-role aircraft that is available now and meets the tactical mission requirements of today's complex battle-space, Boeing officials said.

It can perform virtually every mission including air superiority, day/night strike with precision-guided weapons, fighter escort, close air support, suppression of enemy air defences, maritime strike, reconnaissance, forward air control and tanker missions.

Built by the industry team of Boeing, Northrop Grumman, GE Aircraft Engines, Raytheon and 1,900 other suppliers across the US, the Super Hornet provides the war-fighter with today's newest advances in multi-mission capability and growth for decades to come in missions, roles and technology, officials said.

With a total of 11 weapons stations, the Super Hornet provides war-fighters with extraordinary payload flexibility by carrying a mixed load of air-to-air and air-to-ground ordnance.

Two General Electric F414-GE-400 engines power the Super Hornet, producing a combined thrust of 44,000 pounds. The F414's light yet robust design yields a 9:1 thrust-to-weight ratio, one of the highest of any modern fighter engine, the officials said.

The Super Hornet entered combat on its maiden voyage in 2002. Boeing has delivered more than 395 F/A-18E/Fs to the US Navy. Every Super Hornet produced has been delivered on or ahead of schedule, according to the officials.

Contending for what has been touted as India's single largest defence deal ever are five other competing MRCA aircraft-Lockheed Martin's F-16 Falcon, Euro-fighter Typhoon, Swedish Saab JAS 39 Gripen, Russian MiG-35 and the French Dassault Rafale.

Boeing officials would not say anything about the rivals, but Ted Herman, Manager F18 Integrated Business Development Programme, proudly pointed to his unit's enviable record of timely delivery and well-within-budget production with high reliability and high mission capable rates.

Using civil aircraft techniques and features designed in the Advance Strike Technology programme of the 90s, the St. Louis facility rolls out four new planes every month.

But after a contract is signed, it takes about 38 months before the first plane is delivered, with the aircraft taking shape over a period of 18 months in the sprawling 'Home of the Super Hornet' here.

It takes nine months to just forge the fuselage, 50 days to assemble the wings, and another 55 days for forward fuselage assembly, 30 of them used to 'stuff' it with wiring, hydraulics and pneumatics, said Herman as he took the media round what he called the 'most advanced full rate production line in the world'.

Super Hornet's design incorporates all aspects of the aircraft, systems, performance and capabilities, fabrication and manufacture and life cycle support with computer design of structures and components, computer check for fit and assembly and digital shipping, handling and tracking and management on the floor.

Once the aircraft takes full form in final assembly, it is sealed and subjected to a 20-minute heavy rainstorm before it's prepared for flight with all the dynamic structures put in place-engine, CADs (cartridge actuated devices), ejection seats, radar and avionics boxes - and all are run through functional checks.

The first flight is performed by the company test pilot and 'gripes' that show up are fixed before the next flight and verified by the customer.

If India chooses to opt for Super Hornets, it will get the same assurance of real time operational capability with a proven solid design, under budget and on time delivery, said Herman, 'from a team that delivers on promises'.

http://in.news.yahoo.com/43/20090712/890/twl-boeing-eyes-10-bn-indian-contract-wi.html
 
^^^ Do not respond to this idiotic poster and spammer!!! BD and Bengali people are beautiful and nice!!!! Ignoring is best cure for this disease.
 
Hey watch ur toungue ! Why r u Throwing some meaningless comments and polluting thread !
 
Here we go again Mr. troll has a new identity now.
 
I still root for a single engined solution.
There is already a heavy fighter operational in the MKI, MRCA should be an MRCA.
The twin engined entries in the MRCA contest are for all thier technological prowess still on the heavier side. The Gripen would make a wonderful addition doe to its almost perfect mid level punch not to mention the ability to operate from short runways which seems to go well with the cold start doctrine. Since there is already an MCA planned. Unless that is still a pipe dream??
 
Lockheed Martin India head takes off in a hurry
Ajai Shukla / New Delhi July 13, 2009, 0:35 IST
With several major defence procurements blocked after the arrest of former Ordnance Factory Board Chairman Sudipta Ghosh on May 19, alarmed defence contractors posted in New Delhi are riveted by another drama.




Also Read

Related Stories
News Now
- Raytheon in tie-up for bagging aircraft order
This fortnight, Ambassador Douglas A Hartwick, Lockheed Martin India’s CEO, who was spearheading the world’s largest defence manufacturer’s campaign to sell India the F-16 IN medium fighter aircraft, was withdrawn from India in an unusual hurry. Sources describe Hartwick as “having barely enough time to pack” before catching his flight out of Delhi.

Defence ministry sources say Hartwick was removed as CEO after Lockheed Martin was found in possession of two folders containing classified information relating to defence purchases. According to this account, these folders found their way to the corporate headquarters of Lockheed Martin, in Bethesda, Maryland, USA. There, in January 2009, they were mistakenly placed on the desk of an officer unfamiliar with Lockheed Martin’s operations in India. Reading the “Government of India, Ministry of Defence” heading on the file, the Lockheed Martin official referred the folders back to the Indian defence ministry in New Delhi.

Since then, a furious defence ministry has been trying to ascertain how Lockheed Martin obtained those folders and whether ethical standards had been flouted. Since January, through the Aero India 2009 air show in February, where Lockheed Martin displayed its products, including the F-16 IN fighter, the defence ministry has trodden cautiously with Lockheed Martin, without actually taking action against the company.

The general elections placed the controversy on the back burner; now, however, comes Hartwick’s departure.

Lockheed Martin strenuously denies possessing India-related documents that were not already in the public domain. But in a telephone interview with Business Standard, Richard Kirkland, president of Lockheed Martin’s South Asia operations, admitted that, in early 2009, the company did write back to “the appropriate ministry” about issues that “we did not sense as understood well enough… or came through a channel that we would expect.”

Kirkland explained, “We had a couple of issues that we did not understand how they would be treated in terms of (the Defence Procurement Policy – 2008) procedures. We have had occasion to ask various agencies of the government of India for clarification about information that was contained within a larger context or larger report…”

Kirkland declined to provide details of the two reports referred back to India’s defence ministry, but emphasised that neither related to the Indian tender for 126 Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA), worth an estimated $11 billion.

Lockheed Martin also denies that the government of India asked, either formally or informally, for their India CEO to be replaced. Kirkland insists that this is a routine turnover as Lockheed Martin moves into an “execution phase”. He said, “I have had discussions with Ambassador Hartwick as early as Aero India in Bangalore last February, about the transition of office…”

Despite Lockheed Martin’s insistence that this move was envisioned since February, Ambassador Hartwick’s successor has not yet been decided. Lockheed Martin’s spokesperson Jeffrey Adams said, “Richard Kirkland will look after India operations until the company finds a replacement for Ambassador Hartwick.”

Douglas Hartwick is an old New Delhi hand, having served two tenures in India as a diplomat; the second of them was as the Economic and Scientific Affairs Counsellor in the US embassy from 1994-1997. He went on to serve as US ambassador to Laos before he retired, obtaining the honorific of ‘Ambassador’. In 2007, he joined Lockheed Martin, the world’s largest defence corporation with annual sales in excess of $40 billion (Rs 2,00,000 crore). It employs 140,000 people worldwide, the bulk of them in the United States.

The company is pushing a range of military systems in India including the F-16 IN fighter; the F-35 Lightening II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) as the IAF’s next generation fighter; and the Aegis Combat System for the Indian Navy’s warships. Last year India signed a contract, under the US government Foreign Military Sales programme, to buy six Lockheed Martin C-130J Super Hercules transport aircraft, worth over a billion dollars. India is likely to exercise its option for another six C-130J aircraft.
 
I still root for a single engined solution.
There is already a heavy fighter operational in the MKI, MRCA should be an MRCA.
The twin engined entries in the MRCA contest are for all thier technological prowess still on the heavier side. The Gripen would make a wonderful addition doe to its almost perfect mid level punch not to mention the ability to operate from short runways which seems to go well with the cold start doctrine. Since there is already an MCA planned. Unless that is still a pipe dream??
I agree with you on the single engine fighters and it would be logically though MMRCA is meant as a replacement for single engine Mig 21. But F16 is an old airframe only with upg systems, except from the radar it will offer nothing new. Gripen NG would be great and I bet very likely if it would be more independent, but with all the reliability to other nations (many main parts of US, AESA development stopped twice under pressure of France and US) it looks weak. Not to forget that it is as the Mig 35 still under development and delays are very likely!
The next one which comes close to them is Rafale, which is a new Mirage 2000 with 2 instead of 1 engine. The size, weight and the performance are still pretty comparable to F16. And it was designed with the aim equal, or in some fields even less maintenance cost than Mirage 2000.
I don't see much chances for the single engine fighters anymore and imo the winner will be Rafale, EF, or F18SH.
MCA is not needed at the moment and should be mainly a push of HAL than from MoD, or IAF. We will have a 5 gen fighter and with MMRCA have the chance to get a low RCS fighter with good a2g capabilities, so HAL should keep concentrating on LCA.
 
You know.. India should have gone with that mini flanker offered by Sukhoi has its LCA.. Although the advantages of designing such a fighter on your own are tremendous.. the logistical payoffs to that route would have been greater. Sort of like the F-15-16 mix.
As far as the MRCA is concerned.. I think logically.. the EF should win(most exported, tried and has much larger user base.
It is what the PAF wanted. That I can assure you is what I heard from my contacts. The Rafale was deemed just too expensive and not worth it.
The MIG-35.. to me is a poor third in this aspect.. The FA-18.. is a bomb truck, unless the 9x is thrown into the package.
 
Lockheed Martin India head takes off in a hurry
Ajai Shukla / New Delhi July 13, 2009, 0:35 IST
With several major defence procurements blocked after the arrest of former Ordnance Factory Board Chairman Sudipta Ghosh on May 19, alarmed defence contractors posted in New Delhi are riveted by another drama.
F16 F18 out of the MCRA race.
Now Gripen is said to be still in race but lets face it, it is out as it had troubles with some and Israeli TOT with Americans. You can pretty much count it out.

Rafel,Eurofighter Mig 35.

I hope Mig wings.... :D
 
You know.. India should have gone with that mini flanker offered by Sukhoi has its LCA.. Although the advantages of designing such a fighter on your own are tremendous.. the logistical payoffs to that route would have been greater. Sort of like the F-15-16 mix.
Independence is the key factor here! If we keep just buying stuff from others, we always will be reliable and in control of them (look at US and how reliable they are to Pak Forces now).
As far as the MRCA is concerned.. I think logically.. the EF should win(most exported, tried and has much larger user base.
It is what the PAF wanted. That I can assure you is what I heard from my contacts. The Rafale was deemed just too expensive and not worth it.
Those are also my favourites too, but EF still lacks the a2g capabilities and it shows that having too many partners can be a problem (AESA development unsure because of ITA). Rafale is the better multi role aircraft and would fit in IAF, specially with some customizations (Elta 2052 radar, Kaveri-Snecma engine, Amraam till Meteor is ready), btw if Rafale is too expensive, EF is it also right? ;)
The FA-18.. is a bomb truck, unless the 9x is thrown into the package.
Don't underestimate the radar and the weapon package! AESA with AIM120-C/D in BVR, AIM9X with JHMCS in WVR, HARM and maybe the Growler light for SEAD are pretty good points and for close combat there are nearly 300 MKI and Mig 29.
Anyway I prefer the Europeans because of more independence and reliability!
 
Air-pockets before the air fair

New Delhi: In a few days, the first of the foreign fighters will land in Bangalore to kick-start field trials for India's biggest open tender military contract ever, worth almost Rs60,000 crore, for 126 fighters. Just days away from that, industrial espionage, national rivalries and gigantic logistical nightmares take over the race.

The complexities of the field trials would be unheard of in Indian military standards. Six of the contenders -- two American fighters (F-18 and F-16), three from Europe (Eurofighter, Gripen and Rafale) and one from Russia (MIG-35) -- would land in India for extensive evaluation by a team of officers drawn from various branches of air force and outside. Those from the IAF's Aircraft and Systems Testing Establishment, DRDO's Centre for Military Airworthiness and Certification and HAL will be involved in the evaluation process.

The process starts this August and winds up next summer. Competing fighters will be in India for two to three weeks, air force sources indicate. The first fighters to land could be from the US.

Sources said a large number of air force officials, respective fighter companies and others have been shuttling round the globe for the field trials. Representatives of vendors came to India to survey locations in Bangalore, Jaisalmer and Leh for the field trials.

Presently, air force is in the process of sending pilots and engineers to vendor locations for training. Vendors have been asked to bring at least one double-seater fighter for the trials, but most of the companies are expected to have at least one back-up during the trial period.

The teams will also carry out evaluations in the home countries of the fighters. None of the six contenders are expected to fly their fighters across continents armed with missiles.

"So the weapon trials would have to be at the home bases," said an air force source. However, the air force has already said it would prefer to carry out the firing in India. "That would significantly shoot up our insurance charges," says a source in one of the companies.

Lockheed boss flees
Even as US firm Lockheed Martin makes an aggressive pitch with its legendary F-16 fighter, it has embroiled itself in an embarrassing controversy that forced its India chief to quit and leave India secretly. In a bizarre twist, Lockheed Martin headquarters sent back to the MoD a couple of its internal files that the US defence firm had illegally obtained. The files came back because of a mess-up by a senior executive who thought it was legitimately handed over to the firm by the MoD.

The heat is on
Sources from Israel Aerospace Industries alleged, through Israeli media, that they were forced to quit a partnership with Gripen, the Swedish fighter, for a contract. Pressure from Pentagon forced the Israelis to keep out of the lucrative contract, but it now looks like the US was paving way for the American fighter companies.
 
France's Dassault targets Lockheed in combat aircraft deal

The gloves are off in the competition to sell India 126 Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) for an estimated Rs 50,000 crore. Two days after Business Standard reported on the sudden replacement of Lockheed Martin India’s CEO, Lockheed’s French rival, Dassault Aviation — whose Rafale fighter is pitched against Lockheed Martin’s F-16 IN in the MMRCA tender — is contemplating asking the Indian Ministry of Defence (MoD) to disqualify Lockheed Martin from the tender. The reason: sources in Dassault allege that Lockheed Martin has illegally obtained access to classified documents relating to the competition.

Approached for details of Dassault’s decision, the company’s Indian representative, Pusina Rao, told Business Standard over the telephone from Paris, “Dassault executives are in discussions and will soon reach a final decision on what action it will initiate against Lockheed Martin. In any case, the French government will have the final word, since there are political repercussions involved.”

Rao declined to comment on how long it would take for Paris to approach the Indian MoD for action against Lockheed Martin.

Sources close to the MMRCA contract point out that tension has been growing between Dassault and Lockheed Martin since the end of 2008, when the Indian media reported that Dassault had been eliminated from the MMRCA contract because it had not fulfilled some of the technical requirements spelt out in the Indian tender. Weeks after the report — and apparently after French President Nikolas Sarkozy spoke to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh over the phone — it was announced that Dassault was very much in contention.

But Dassault believed that Lockheed Martin was responsible for those reports. Now, Dassault is determined to get back at Lockheed Martin, citing charges of corruption in clear violation of the guidelines in India’s Defence Procurement Policy-2008 (DPP-2008).

On Tuesday, reporting on Lockheed’s India CEO, Ambassador Douglas A Hartwick’s sudden recall to the US without the appointment of a replacement, Business Standard had quoted Lockheed Martin’s Asia Chief, Rick Kirkland, as saying that while Lockheed Martin had never possessed classified Indian procurement documents, the company’s US headquarters had written to the MoD in New Delhi seeking clarification over two “unclassified files” that had found their way into Lockheed’s possession.

The MMRCA competition is growing increasingly heated, with all six competitors — Lockheed Martin; Boeing; Dassault; Grippen; MiG; and Eurofighter — scheduled to produce their aircraft for flight testing by the Indian Air Force, turn by turn, starting this month.
 
$12-BILLION PRIZE

All leading world aircraft makers producing advanced combat planes consider the tender for delivering 126 fighters to the Indian Air Force under the MMRCA (Medium Multirole Combat Aircraft) programme the most important and the largest of all present-day tenders. The contract is estimated at $11-12 billion. The Russian MiG-35, US Lockheed-Martin F-16 and Boeing F/A-18, French Dassault Rafale, European Eurofighter Typhoon and Swedish SAAB Gripen are going to compete for this prize. In April, some mass media reported that Rafale refused to participate, but then it was denied and now the French fighter seems to take part in the tender.

Most market analysts think there are no evident winners. The winner will be chosen after comparative tests of all participating fighters that should start in April-May. To this end, each participant should present two aircraft – a single- and double-seat one. Indian Air Force pilots will carry out tests in two stages. At the first stage, they will estimate their flight performance and applicability for the Indian climate and terrain including high-level airdromes. The second stage scheduled for this autumn will probably take place at test bases of manufacturing countries – the Indians will compare characteristics of on-board equipment and armament. After flight tests, India is going to bolt out three or four outsiders. The choice from the resulting short list of 2-3 fighters will be made considering many factors. India will take into account the cost and financing structures, amount of technologies transferred, offset programme for compensation deliveries, which should account for at least 50% of the contract price and local production options. 108 of 126 fighters should be assembled and manufactured at a growing rate at Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) enterprises in India. Foreign policy trends will be important, too. It was initially planned that the Indian Air Force will get MMRCA aircraft in 2012. Speaking at the Aero India show, however, Indian Air Force Chief of Staff (this post corresponds to Commanderin- Chief in Russia) Chief Air Marshal Fali Homi said that fighters deliveries would start in 2013 if everything was al right. India’s Air Force is going to raise the number of its combat squadrons from the current 32-33 (each having 14-18 aircraft) to 39.5 by 2017 and to 42 by 2020. These plans also envisage important modernization programmes, firstly relating to the MiG-29. At the press briefing devoted to the MiG-35 at Aero India 2009, RSK MiG Engineering Center Chief Vladimir Barkovskiy said the company had started fulfilling the modernization contract worth about $1 billion. Six Indian MiGs (four MiG-29s single-seat fighters and two MiG-29UB two-seat combat trainers)
have already arrived in Moscow.

Mr.Barkovskiy said that “India has now 62 MiG-29 fighters in total”. Another 56 aircraft will be upgraded at the Indian 11th aircraft maintenance base. “We have visited this enterprise and concluded that Indian specialists would cope with this task”, noted the chief of RSK MiG Engineering Center. Well-known Indian newspaper The Times of India announced some other information in its local Bangalore edition on February 13. It reported that India has 69 MiG-29s and all of them should be modernized already by 2011. The contract for upgrading 51 Dassault Mirage 2000 may be signed soon, too. But no doubt that Su-30MKI fighters are the beauty and pride of the Indian Air Force. The contracts for their deliveries and license production totally cost about $8.5 billion. About 100 aircraft have already been put into service, while India totally ordered 230 Su-30MKIs. By the way, the MMRCA project (126 aircraft) costs 41% more than the Su-30MKI one (230 aircraft) given the 1.8 times less number of aircraft.

The military-technical cooperation between Russia (the Soviet Union) and India started as early as 1963 from the contract of the then-advanced MiG-21 fighter. Of course, the 45-year military-technical cooperation between our countries raises

the chances of the MiG-35 in the tender. The Zhuk-AE AFAR radar designed by Fazotron-NIIR and new missile equipment may play the decisive role, too. The Vayu Show Daily issued at Bangalore’s show reported that the MiG-35’s armament includes Kh-59MK2 air-to-surface missiles with a range of up to 285 km and 300-kg penetrating or cluster warhead. The missile works by the fire-and-forget principle, has terrain recognition and correlation guidance capability and can engage targets lacking radar, optical and IR signature. The MiG-35 can be also armed with the Kh-38 modular missile that has modifications with laser, active radar and IR homing devices as well as satellite navigation system. The 520-kg missile has a warhead weighing 250 kg. The Kh-59MK2 and Kh-58 are developed by Tactical Missiles Corporation. The MiG- 35’s air-to-air missiles will be renewed, too. The fighter will get RVV-MD and RVVSD advanced short- and medium-range missiles that outperform the well-known
RVV-AE and R-73.

But India has some reasons not to choose the MiG-35. The main one is that it does not want to put all the eggs in one basket buying foreign military equipment, which is a consistent and firm position. As it was already told, the Su-30MKI is the main aircraft of the Indian Air Force. In these conditions, the expected consolidation of RSK MiG and Sukhoi companies that has already started when Mikhail Pogosyan became their sole chief will not only make Russia the monopoly supplier of combat aircraft to India if it chooses the MiG-35 but will leave no choice even among manufacturers. By the way, two US companies – Boeing and Lockheed- Martin – are participating in the tender and the US is not afraid of the so-called internal competition, which Rosoboronexport is actively trying to get rid of.

AFAR and PR
But there is another side of the problem, which is traditionally underestimated by Russia. It is the PR support of our contract bid. Russia sent only one MiG-35 to the Aero India show held in February this year. At first it seemed to send two fighters but did not manage to prepare the second one, while the US sent there as many as five F-16s. They included two F-16E/F Block 60s of the UAE Air Force and three F-16C/D Block 50s of the US Air Force. Lockheed-Martin offers India a special modification dubbed F-16IN Super Viper, which, however, differs from the UAE’s F- 16E/F chiefly by the name. But there is a special sense in the name, too! In Russian, Super Viper does not sound very good, but it raises the respects for the fighter and its aggressiveness by the Indians who have a special attitude to poisonous snakes. Index IN also proves that the model was created specially for the client. By the way, Sweden was the first to use this designation offering their Gripen IN. How could we surpass the invasion of Falcons that turned to Super Vipers in Bangalore? Indeed, we have an excellent Strizhi pilot team with six MiG-29s. Why not send them to India to show their skills over the Yelahanka air base? Of course, it is expensive but it is a trifle against $12
billion to be received by the winner.

Another PR solution of Lockheed-Martin was the demonstration flight of India’s-first individual Olympic champion Abkhinava Bindra in F-16’s dual cockpit. During the 45-min flight, he even had hold of the control stick. The popularity of the 26-year air rifle shooter can be compared with that of Yuriy Gagarin in the Soviet Union in the 1960’s. With that, Indian newspapers and even Russian and international mass media using Lockheed-Martin’s press releases to tell about this advertisement flight forgot that the first India’s Olympic gold was won by its field hockey team at Moscow 1980 Olympics.

To tell the truth, Russia gave as good as it got, too. A day before Bindra’s flight, RSK MiG’s test pilot Mikhail Belyayev piloted the MiG-35 with retired Air Marshal Kharish Masand, who was the chief of the Indian Air Force 28th Squadron, which was the first to get MiG-29s. The

62-year Masand highly appreciated the MiG-35’s flight performance, “One can only imagine what younger Indian pilots can do on this aircraft!” Interestingly, the pretty 30-year Indian journalist Suman Sharma was the first Indian citizen to fly on both the MiG-35 and F-16. So, the score of demonstration flights is 2 to 2, but the US surpassed us by the attention in Indian mass media due to a better choice of a passenger. The agreement of Northrop Grumman with two Indian companies Bharat Electronics and Dynamatic Technologies for manufacturing in Bangalore components for US APG-68(V)-9 radars installed on F-16s was not accidental, too. Though these radars have mechanical scanning and the F-16IN employs the APG-80 AFAR radar of the same producer, one can say that well begun is half done. By this step, the US proved that it is ready to cooperate with Indian electronics
industry.

AFAR equipment plays an important role in the MMRCA. The Indian Air Force stress they want to have this breakthrough technology on delivered fighters very much. The US installs Northrop Grumman APG-80 AFAR radars on F-16E/F fighters of the UAE Air Force and Raytheon APG-79 one – on F/A-18E/F Block 2 fighters of the US Naval Air Force. These
very radars are offered to India.

The French Rafale can be equipped by a new Thales-made AFAR radar. Sweden also has an AFAR radar on their newgeneration Gripen NG, which can be called the dream of the Indian Air Force meeting all their requirements. Indeed, the Gripen has achieved everything and even more that India has been fruitlessly trying to do for about twenty years developing their own LCA Tejas fighter. But unfortunately, Sweden does not produce its own tranceivers – the basis of AFAR. To test the technology, Sweden bought US-made tranceivers and combined them with well-reputed blocks of their own PS- 05/A radar. By the way, Fazotron has chosen the same method of combination with tried-and-true blocks. But then the Swedes were disappointed. It turned out that the US did not want to sell tranceivers for series production offering the radar only in block. Thus, Sweden would have to ask the US permission for every export contract. The Swedes did not agree with it and signed a contract for tranceivers with French company Thales. But this had happened before Thales and Dassault received a state order for the development and production of AFAR radar for French Rafale fighters. Later on, Dassault bought a large block of Thales stock thus getting a possibility to influence its decisions. But the most important thing is that the Gripen became the main Rafale’s rival not only in India, but in Brazil, too. France told Sweden that it would deliver tranceivers only for the test model but not for series ones. So, Swedish designers had only two possible transceiver suppliers left – Scotland and Russia. In the author’s opinion repeatedly expressed in his articles for a number of years (he is an expert in the Swedish aircraft and electronics industries) the Russian-Swedish cooperation in this field would have been fully mutually-beneficial. After getting a denial by Russia, Sweden turned to Edinburgh-based company SELEX S&AS UK. At first, this Scottish company was called Ferranti, then – GECMarconi, after that – BAE Systems and now, in the era of total globalization, this is a division of Italian holding FINMECCANICA. SELEX has the Vixen AFAR radar, which won tenders for equipping the US Coast Guard HC-130 patrol aircraft and US Customs and Border Service
Cessna Citation.

And what about Eurofighter Typhoon? This company has a unique position relating to the AFAR radar. They are trying to convince Indian Air Force authorities that their fighter’s Captor mechanical scanning radar is better than expensive and not well-proven AFAR ones. To confirm this position, three Typhoons and chiefs of staff of the German, UK, Italian and Spanish air forces arrived in India. Notably, the Russian MiG-35 did not receive such a support from the Russian Air Force. Europeans noted that 167 Typhoons have already been built and there are firm orders for 707 aircraft, which will load production lines up to 2020. By the way, orders for the F-16 will soon end, while any country wants to have an aircraft still being manufactured in series. The fleet of Typhoons has already amassed 57,000 flight hours – 10,000 by the German Luftwaffe and 25,000 – by the Royal Air Force. The main advantage of the EU bid is, perhaps, compensating for the lack of an AFAR radar. The European consortium offered to help India in testing and finishing the long-suffering Tejas including the installation of Typhoon’s Eurojet EJ200 powerplant on the next Tejas Mk2 version. India is attracted by the reduction of operational costs by unifying engines on the both types of aircraft in service. They also say that the newer Tejas with European engines could be exported to third countries jointly with the Typhoon as light and medium fighters with the same engine. It is not clear which markets are meant, but they are probably represented by poor African states still armed with MiG-21s and F-5s. By the way, the modification of the Russian RD-33 engine can also power Tejas and the latter can be unified with MiG-29K and MiG-35 aircraft. Rosoboronexport’s press release says “The development of the Kaveri national aircraft engine for the LCA Tejas light combat aircraft is the main task for India.” India plans to deliver at least 150 LCA fighters to its Armed Forces. It is the Kaveri that should make this aircraft a multifunctional fighter able to engage ground and aerial targets. Powered by this engine, the Tejas LCA can be used as a deck-based fighter, too. Considering the changed requirements for the engine, Russia said it was ready to participate in the Kaveri programme or upgrade it to the level of an advanced Russian aircraft engine. As for finishing the Kaveri that has already been developed for 20 years, the hero of Pavel Luspekayev in a wonderful movie “The white sun of the desert” said “It will hardly happen…” But “East is a complicated matter” (a quotation from the same film), so the cooperation with Indian engine manufacturers may raise the MiG-
35’s chances, too.

Many-sided cooperation
The cooperation between Russia and India is developing in many directions. The AERO INDIA 2009 airspace show proved that Moscow and Deli have strategic relations in the military-technical sphere. This was repeatedly stressed by Indian Defense Minister Arakkaparambil Kurian Entoni, who said “Our joint projects on BraMos missiles, 5th-generation combat aircraft and multifunctional transport aircraft have became the forerunners of new heights to be achieved by our countries in the military-technical sphere. India is interested not only to maintain but to strengthen this interaction as well.” Rosoboronexport considers that at this new stage, the Indian-Russian cooperation remains long-term and mutuallybeneficial. Previously we had only ‘sellercustomer’ relations, but now our countries are actively cooperating in the field of joint developments and production. Rosoboronexport, Irkut Research and

Production Enterprise, Ilyushin Aircraft Corporation and Indian corporation HAL are jointly developing the MTA Russian- Indian medium-range transport aircraft initially positioned as a dual-purpose aircraft. It should both meet requirements of the military and have commercial prospects. This project is carried out on technical and financial risks sharing conditions. The new aircraft is to replace obsolete Indian Air Force C-130 and An-12 aircraft. India has already confirmed its plans to buy 45 aircraft with an option for the same number. Russian military sources say Russia is going to acquire at least 100 aircraft by 2025, which is quite enough for the project’s financial feasibility. Notably, Brazilian company Embraer is planning to create almost the same aircraft. The C390 project is supported by the Brazilian Defense Ministry, besides Embraer aircraft will be based on a successful E190 passenger liner. Brazil has directly told that it wanted to unite efforts on the transport aircraft programme. But Russia and India seem to be unwilling to join efforts with Brazil. The author of this article feels sorry for this unwillingness. The MTA project allowed accumulating a rich experience of implementing joint international projects that will be further used to create combat aircraft, particularly the 5th-generation fighter. According to Indian Air Marshall Fali Homi Major, the Russian-Indian 5th-generation fighter is to make its first flight in 2015 and probably even sooner. This project is being realized according to the intergovernmental agreement on the joint development and production of the 5th-generation fighter signed in October 2007 in Moscow at the 7th meeting of the Russian-Indian Intergovernmental Commission on Military-Technical Cooperation. The advanced aircraft will employ a completely new platform with cutting-edge solutions including stealth technology. The fighter will combine extra maneuverability and supersonic speed, long range and high anti-air defense capability. It will be equipped with advanced communications systems as well as multifunctional intelligence information accumulation equipment with optical, IR, laser and radar sensors. In Bangalore, Indian mass media repeatedly asked when the prototype of the Russian 5th-generation fighter (PAK FA) will make its maiden flight. So, Sukhoi and RSK MiG General Director Mikhail Pogosyan answered that this will happen within a year. Notably, Russia and Brazil have signed a memorandum on military- technical cooperation about a year ago, in which Russia said it was ready to talk with Brazil on the 5th-generation fighter. But nothing has been heard about this project so far. If Russia, India and Brazil start cooperating both on the MTA and PAK FA, Brazil will surely include the Su-35 into their tender. The Su-35 left this Air Force tender last year as it was out of the final short list. The acceptance tests of the new AL-55I engine made by Russia for the HJT-36 Indian combat trainer on order of the HAL corporation have begun following engine testing on the Russian flying platform, which proved its main flight characteristics. Russia and India signed the respective protocol in Moscow on October 16 last year. The next stage allows for the AL-55I’s certification tests on Indian HJT-36 aircraft. At present, Rosoboronexport is actively helping to organize manufacturing the pilot batch of AL-55Is, their certification and license production in India. Speaking about the results of the show, Chief of Rosoboronexport delegation, Deputy General Director Viktor Komardin said “We are fully satisfied with the results of AERO INDIA 2009. In Delhi and Bangalore, we have conducted a number of serious marketing events, useful negotiations and meeting. We think the Indian airspace forum is much more important than European ones and we are going to do our best to raise the prestige of the AERO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom