OUPS !
Just have a look to B2 bomber..... beautifull curves....
View attachment 423068
NO NO NO.
It reach Mach 1.4 with 6AAM without PC !
YOU JUST CREATE THE GENERATION IN THE ENGINE !!!! are you paid by LM ?
It's BS.
The Sugar box F35 need more thrust and request more PC to fly at lower speed ! It's all but stealthier in IR !
In terms of IR signature, primary factors are size, speed and engine emissions. Rafale has two M88 engines producing a total of 9.953 kgf on dry thrust and 15.077 kgf thrust in reheat, compared to 12.700/19.512 kgf for the F135. Further, since Rafale’s engine emissions are divided in two engines, leading to increased cooling due to greater ratio of plume surface area to crosssection. While normally this advantage would be negated by aerodynamic superiority of single-engined aircraft, this is not the case here. F-35s unaerodynamic fuselage means that it requires full dry thrust to achieve speed of Mach 0,95, while Rafale supercruises at Mach 1,4 at equivalent engine setting, and with 6 missiles. Consequently, Rafale has significantly lower engine IR signature when compared to the F-35 at same speed. Rafale also has smaller frontal and side signature,
And
don't forget F35 need to open its internal bays often to refresh itself.... cold plane you say ?
F35 helmet is more like a fireman helmet than a fighter helmet.
View attachment 423073
It breaks the small pilot neck.
And the F35 system is unable to follow a ground moving target ! no need of a complicated helmet to do so few.
USA win ?
View attachment 423074
Same situation for Algeria war for France my dear.
Sure.
It's why it is unable to sustain more than 7G.
Vietnam was win?
Irak is a heaven
Afganistan is the next place for holydays.
Same for the so called "less than 100$million" F35...