What's new

Dar warns India not to cast an evil eye on Pakistan's economic prosperity!

GB is a part of Kashmir..
Damn.. it's so complicated!!
No, its not part of Azad Kashmir. So again, just shove it:
10508.jpg
 
Part of Jammu Kashmir. you take that flag and shove it :enjoy:
Not been a part of it since partition. If you can annex Nizam of Hyderabad due to its Hindu majority, we can also annex GB, AK for the very same reason. Again, just shove it troll! :lol:
 
Not been a part of it since partition. If you can annex Nizam of Hyderabad due to its Hindu majority, we can also annex GB, AK for the very same reason. Again, just shove it troll! :lol:
Part of undivided Jammu & Kashmir that Hari Singh acceded. Was taken away by militia before accession. So, the claim is on the whole of it. Read history, and after that shove the book fool:D
 
Part of undivided Jammu & Kashmir that Hari Singh acceded. Was taken away by militia before accession. So, the claim is on the whole of it. Read history, and after that shove the book fool:D

Nizam of Hyderabad never got the chance to be divided. It was annexed as a whole by invading Indian forces. Read your own BS history before calling others fools:
Indian integration of Hyderabad - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you believe Indians had the right to take Nizam forcibly, then we Pakistanis deserve the same right, not less.
 
Actually, we do care about Kashmiris, not Muslims:

Pakistanis have a habit of caring for Americans, Afghans, Iranians, Palestinians, other Arabs, Bengalis, Kashmiris, Indian Muslims, Indian-lower castes as well, anything but Pakistan.

Only if a little attention was diverted towards another fellow Pakistani, things would have been productive.

If you believe Indians had the right to take Nizam forcibly, then we Pakistanis deserve the same right, not less.

There is a difference. Upon being attacked by tribal militia, Hari Singh acceded to India, on 26 October, 1947. Surprising to notice, Pakistan's military adventurism started only a few months after independence, before people people could even properly understand the new map of Pakistan.
There has been no such case with Hyderabad. If you had known who and what the last Nizam was, you would have understood, he equally despised being a part of Pakistan.

I suggest you read these books

Freedom at Midnight - by Dominique Lapierre
India a History by John Keay

And then shove it :enjoy:
 
he equally despised being a part of Pakistan.
He equally despised being a part of India as well. There was a reason why his state was invaded by force when he categorically refused to join Indian willingly. Indians should not throw stones when they are sitting in the glass houses. Shove it troll! :lol:
 
He equally despised being a part of India as well. There was a reason why his state was invaded by force when he categorically refused to join Indian willingly. Indians should not throw stones when they are sitting in the glass houses. Shove it troll! :lol:

When did anybody say India did not invade Hyderabad ? Major General Joyanto Nath Chaudhuri led the charge.

Nizam has having a hard time to let go of his princely state. The same was the case everywhere.
Interestingly, Major Gen. Syed Ahmed El Edroos, Commander in Chief of Nizam's army had advised against war.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom