They already have lot of weapons so they are not so desperate to get there hands on SCAR. But yes eventually they will get SCAR. Right now priority is infantry and LCB
What version???? the H or the inaccurate L.
Hazrat you must understand. everything you say comes from horus and no one can verify it either, then the problem is you make some incredible claims that once again cannot be verified as only you have the source that cannot be disclosed!
Have you seen the Colombian chap who pointed out the SCAR fiasco in Peru?
Special Forces will go for both versions. And L is not inaccurate but quite good much better than M4.
Yes and that doesn't concern us.Hazrat you must understand. everything you say comes from horus and no one can verify it either, then the problem is you make some incredible claims that once again cannot be verified as only you have the source that cannot be disclosed!
You have the right to do fanboyism for SCAR, no one will say anything else BUT let other people discuss the rifle they want! is that fair? instead of being an agent for FN how about neutrality. The concept of neutrality is known to you I know it.
It has nothing to do with rifle failing either! let me be clear on it!!
as always; SCAR is the best rifle in Trials
Have you seen the Colombian chap who pointed out the SCAR fiasco in Peru?
He is not the only one. Look up on the internet. There are many other similar concers from multiple sources. I hope a wise decision is made here. As for our bahi saying that beretta failed or CZ failed, its BS. Again, i saw that recomendation letter MYSELF!!! Two guns are given the nod of approval and business negotiations are on going, however a bit quite on that front for some weeks now. A third gun was okeyed as 2nd option.
Those are not incredible claims dude we are not going to make our source stand in front of you so you can verify it. And @Horus of this forum has most sourcesHazrat you must understand. everything you say comes from horus and no one can verify it either, then the problem is you make some incredible claims that once again cannot be verified as only you have the source that cannot be disclosed!
You have the right to do fanboyism for SCAR, no one will say anything else BUT let other people discuss the rifle they want! is that fair? instead of being an agent for FN how about neutrality. The concept of neutrality is known to you I know it.
It has nothing to do with rifle failing either! let me be clear on it!!
as always; SCAR is the best rifle in Trials
Have you seen the Colombian chap who pointed out the SCAR fiasco in Peru?
Hazrat I follow you on twitter and you post a lot of Hadith. What is the procedure of making sure that a source is verifiable? In Islam.
Another thing is US military was all set to adopt SCAR platform Even their Spec-Ops used them. I remember the Rangers battalion made it standard issue to them. Then suddenly they dropped?? No explanation given and they went back to AR platform now US army and marines are tilting toward HK416!
Yes it's SCAR was competing in x 51 category and in that it has won BREN was main contender in x 39 in that category
I'm sure Pakistan would have loved trialing the HK 417 and HK 433, but HK is no longer marketing to non-NATO countries.
They can pilot the FN SCAR - or other new guns - for 2-3 years, e.g. with SOF, LEAs, LCBs, etc. Enough heavy field usage with these guys could provide an insight into the long-term utility of these new rifles.
They should sir. Considering how there are reports of troubles, specially with SCAR, surfacing elsewhere.
We know the BREN had problems, but the Czech Gov't and CZ have been open about them and have kept rolling out improvements. The CZ-806 BREN 2 was basically designed to rectify faults in the CZ-805. By trying to reduce weight, reduce recoil, increase accuracy, offer modularity, etc, these new rifles have design issues, all of them do (including HK-416 in the earlier years). I think flaws should be accepted as fact, but with a provision that they be improved via new versions on a frequent basis.
Exactly, CZ have been very very active at addressing the issues and have kept rolling new version, it is essentially an evolved gun that we were testing. FN on other hand have been a bit stagnant or should i say stubborn with there product. Anyway, when the trials were on going i stated this multiple times that Pakistan is going to induct the gun in batches. There will be some thousand guns inducted and put through real life scenario on the battlefield. Those findings will mean changes in the gun or maybe even a change of the gun entirely. This makes sense but there were people who were not willing to agree with this at all stating that the gun finalized will be for whole army. The media and news outlets, even the army sources may state the same for sure as we do not want to piss off our supplier but surely the induction will be in batches and the real life performance will effect further procurement. This is who it should be and how it is most likely to be. Thank you for pointing it out once again.
