What's new

CX-1 Air, land and Sea lunched Cruise Missile: What will it add to Pakistan armed forces?

The SC

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
32,233
Reaction score
21
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
The new CX-1 supersonic anti-ship cruise missile (ASCM) from the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC). Already, scores of images of its full-size display mock-up show an uncanny resemblance to another famous supersonic ASCM, the Mach 2.8-3.0 speed Russian-Indian BrahMos. Both share the distinctive cone-inlet air intake, a two-stage structure and similar dimensions.


cx1%20af%20world%2011%205%2014.jpg


cx1%20%2011%206%2014%20%204a.jpg

A wall poster claims CX-1 has a speed of Mach 2 to Mach 3, has a radar seeker and uses a Lo-High-Lo flight profile. Other Chinese reports say its range is between 50km and 280km. This means it is likely an export model to comply with the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR). It is initially being marketed as a ground-launched anti-ship cruise missile that can be used in concert with short-range ballistic missile and artillery rockets, cued by unmanned aerial vehicles. Later versions are expected to be vertically-launched from ships and perhaps submarines.

poster.jpg



While there is no confirmation that Russia’s NPO Mashinostroyenia sold CASC the technology from its Yakhont supersonic ASCM as it did to India to provide the basis for BrahMos, this should not be surprising. India and Russia have Russian-made Novator 3M-54 Club supersonic terminal-stage ASCMs and Zvezda Kh-31 supersonic anti-radar/ship missiles. But China has also purchased or otherwise acquired the technology to produce its own versions, the larger and longer-range YJ-12, now in Chinese service, is based on Zvezda technology and the YJ-18 is believed to be a shorter range version of the 3M-54. So CASC’s CX-1 is likely China’s third “Russian” supersonic ASCM.

cx1%20%2011%207%2014%20%204a.jpg

A November 8 Chinese state television report on naval weapons contained a very brief view of a new missile being vertically launched from one of the PLA Navy’s two weapons testing ships. While the missile bears a resemblance to CX-1 before nose-cap release and fin extension, Chinese commentators are not unanimous that this is CX-1. But if real, then it would follow that a longer range version may be nearing PLA Navy service entry as the CX-1 version may soon be ready for export.

cctv.jpg


http://aviationweek.com/blog/updated-zhuhai-surprise-china-s-third-russian-supersonic-ascm
 
.
CX-1 cruise missile better than BrahMos, not a copy: report

After China's CX-1 supersonic cruise missile, displayed at the recent Zhuhai Airshow, was noted to resemble India's BrahMos missile, the Beijing-based Sina Military Network undertook a comparison between the Chinese and Indian missiles on Nov. 18.

The Chaoxun-1 missile designed by China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation has earned the nickname Cahoxi 1 ("Copy 1" in English) because of its uncanny similarity to the BrahMos missile jointly developed by Russia and India. However, Wang Hongpo, the chief designer of the missile, said the CX-1 is a completely new design. Wang said it has different wings, aerodynamic guidance and jet vane.

Under the restrictions of the Missile Technology Control Regime, the attacking range of cruise missiles like the CX-1 and BrahMos can not exceed 300 kilometers. Wang said this is the main reason the CX-1 shares many similar characteristics with the BrahMos. Sina Military Network noted that the CX-1 flies faster than the Indian missile. It is capable of reaching a speed of Mach 3 at 17,000 meters, whereas the BrahMos can only reach Mach 2.6 at an altitude of 14,000 meters.

Launched against targets in low altitude, the speed of the CX-1 is Mach 2.3., while the Russian-built P-800 Oniks on which the BrahMos is designed can only reach Mach 2. Sina Military Network said the CX-1's ramjet engine may be better than the solid rocket motor of the P-800. However, it pointed out that the attack range of CX-1 can be reduced to 40 kilometers at low trajectories while the Russian missile can travel 120 kilometers.

Since the BrahMos is designed to conduct attacks below an altitude of 500 meters, the Sina Military Network said the Indian missile is unsuitable for actual combat situations. Though India plans to produce 2,000 BrahMos, only 200 of them have been produced, the report said, adding that the proof of the CX-1's superiority will rest in how many nations wish to purchase it.

http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20141120000089&cid=1101
 
.
New technology will keep coming and maybe offered to Pakistan but My vote goes to DF-21.
 
.
New technology will keep coming and maybe offered to Pakistan but My vote goes to DF-21.
Yeah and DF-21 is also being improved, if i am not wrong i think its newer version is labelled as DF-26. Developing a missile like DF-21D will add a significant boost to Pakistan's A2/AD capabilities.
 
Last edited:
. .
CX-1 cruise missile better than BrahMos, not a copy: report
the Beijing-based Sina Military Network
wantchinatimes

Wantchinatimes and Sina are two of the worst sources for accurate Chinese military related news.
One is anti-china and the other will do anything for the views.

I don't doubt CX-1's capabilities but I'm just pointing this out.
 
.
This is more practical and suitable than Brahmos. The resemblance is due the fact it has a ramjet and all such missile will have the similar configuration with annular intake to achieve the required compression ratio at higher speeds. Furthermore, to limit the range below 300 km to comply with MTCR regime, it has the same sizing but the flight profile and speeds are different.
 
Last edited:
.
This will be great for our Coastal Area Defence Specially Gwadar...

Can we Integrate it in JF-17? Place VLS in F-22 and put these in it also buy Land versions
 
.
.
Chinese military technology is fast closing the gap with America. Much quicker then most anticipated:

http://m.scmp.com/news/china/diplom...ilitary-closing-technology-gap-us-forces-says

Once the Chinese brothers are on par with America And possibly exceed it, that would be a watershed moment for the whole world. It will change the fate of Pakistan for the better permanently.

So you agree that fate and well being of 200 million odd people is in the hands of foreign nation? Quite a travesty as 200 million grouping should be influencing others but then what do I know
 
.
So you agree that fate and well being of 200 million odd people is in the hands of foreign nation? Quite a travesty as 200 million grouping should be influencing others but then what do I know

With that rational then a nation of at least 1.3 billion should be much more technologically, scientifically, militarily and economically powerful than Europe, Russia and america.
With what China has done for Pakistan it's very hard to consider them as "foreign" from a Pakistani POV. More like the fate of Pakistan is somehow intertwined with that of China.
 
Last edited:
.
With that rational then a nation of at least 1.3 billion should be much more technologically, scientifically, militarily and economically powerful than Europe, Russia and america.
With what China has done for Pakistan it's very hard to consider them as "foreign" from a Pakistani POV. More like the fate of Pakistan is somehow intertwined with that of China.

I agree India has massively under performed but atleast India takes responsibility for it's welfare and since it's independence has largely prospered or languished based on it's own merits and demerits. In the end it's Indians who are to blame or praised.

Any other nation will primarily look for it's own interest first no matter how special the friendship. When the time comes China will dump Pakistan like a hot potato and all you will get words of support not deeds like in '65 and '71. Are you ready for that? Pakistan's fate might be dependent on China but rest assured China's fate is not dependent on Pakistan. So Pakistan has no leverage on Pakistan

As a wise man once said " Friendship is seldom lasting but between equals"
 
. .
With what China has done for Pakistan it's very hard to consider them
I agree India has massively under performed but atleast India takes responsibility for it's welfare and since it's independence has largely prospered or languished based on it's own merits and demerits. In the end it's Indians who are to blame or praised.

Any other nation will primarily look for it's own interest first no matter how special the friendship. When the time comes China will dump Pakistan like a hot potato and all you will get words of support not deeds like in '65 and '71. Are you ready for that? Pakistan's fate might be dependent on China but rest assured China's fate is not dependent on Pakistan. So Pakistan has no leverage on Pakistan

As a wise man once said " Friendship is seldom lasting but between equals"

Pakistan doesn't need Chinese military personnel to fight a war for us. We need their TOT with regards to their advanced miltary technology and equipment. Which is already happening on a big scale. Pakistan has more than enough fighting men all over our nation to defend us. If it was all about interests and nothing else then China would not have helped Pakistan to become a nuclear weapons state that indigenously produces advanced missiles and has the ability to produce H-bombs and thermonuclear weapons:

http://isis-online.org/isis-reports...g-nuclear-weapons-time-for-pakistan-to-rever/
 
.
The cone shape is because it is powered by ramjet engine and fueled by kerosene rather than exotic liquid or solid propellants..
 
.
Back
Top Bottom