What's new

Curry originated in what is Modern Day Pakistan

.
Curry, which is thought to have originated as early as 2500 BCE in what is modern-day Pakistan, has since evolved into a truly global food, having traveled the world through colonization and immigration, indentured labor, trade and entrepreneurship.

https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/curry-origins-history/index.html

Based on archaeological evidence, 'curry' originates from around 2600-2500 BC in Mohen jo daro. Mustard, fennel, cumin, and tamarind were ground up and cooked with meats.

:pakistan:

However the only dish named Curry or Kari today in Pakistan is turmeric-based with dumplings (pakorey.)

maxresdefault.jpg
 
.
Based on archaeological evidence, 'curry' originates from around 2600-2500 BC in Mohen jo daro. Mustard, fennel, cumin, and tamarind were ground up and cooked with meats.

:pakistan:

However the only dish named Curry or Kari today in Pakistan is turmeric-based with dumplings (pakorey.)

maxresdefault.jpg
British restaurants marketed 'Karahi' as Curry.
Based on archaeological evidence, 'curry' originates from around 2600-2500 BC in Mohen jo daro. Mustard, fennel, cumin, and tamarind were ground up and cooked with meats.

:pakistan:

However the only dish named Curry or Kari today in Pakistan is turmeric-based with dumplings (pakorey.)

maxresdefault.jpg
Based on the appearance and methods, our Karahi became Anglicized and became Curry.
 
.
British restaurants marketed 'Karahi' as Curry.

Based on the appearance and methods, our Karahi became Anglicized and became Curry.

Exactly, curry is only the above dish I posted.

Everything else is karahi, qorma, shorbah, etc. We have different terms for different dishes.
 
. .
But I have seen that Indians pour methi and Curry leaves in everything ! Even in Qorma ! That is catastrophic for a Qorma dish.

Actually those are just bastardized versions of Mughal/Muslim dishes.

I have even seen Gujuratis obsess over a dish called 'rajma' which tasted like just curry sauce without substance, later I found out it was supposed to be kidney bean sauce.

Pakistanis even do daal dishes justice, but I feel like Indian cuisine is haphazard and all over the place. There is no science to the cooking.

For example, we never eat saag without makki di roti, no matter what.
 
.
Actually those are just bastardized versions of Mughal/Muslim dishes.

I have even seen Gujuratis obsess over a dish called 'rajma' which tasted like just curry sauce without substance, later I found out it was supposed to be kidney bean sauce.

Pakistanis even do daal dishes justice, but I feel like Indian cuisine is haphazard and all over the place. There is no science to the cooking.

For example, we never eat saag without makki di roti, no matter what.
The most abused ingredient is tomato which kills the flavors of any mughal dish. Tomato is being grown not so long ago after Columbus discovered it in America. It arrived in the Himalayan subcontinent not so long ago let alone mughal time. The same can be said about chillies. Mughals used black/white peppers and sometime local long pepper . The real trick to give an authentic mughal gravey the desired thickness is to use fried onions and yogurt.
 
.
Indians don't have any dish... They used to eat leaves and smelly stuff.

Every so called Indian dish nowadays... It's actually Pakistani dishes stolen by the Hindutva. True fact.

Tandoori, Byrani, kardhai, curries, all meat dishes, all other vegetable dishes, all kebabs, all naans, everything is Pakistani/Moghal.
 
.
Indians don't have any dish... They used to eat leaves and smelly stuff.

Every so called Indian dish nowadays... It's actually Pakistani dishes stolen by the Hindutva. True fact.

Tandoori, Byrani, kardhai, curries, all meat dishes, all other vegetable dishes, all kebabs, all naans, everything is Pakistani/Moghal.
Another Indian food which was ( or still?) common among locals is rice cereals made with salt and water. Dried rice with bananas as well.
 
.
Indians don't have any dish... They used to eat leaves and smelly stuff.

Every so called Indian dish nowadays... It's actually Pakistani dishes stolen by the Hindutva. True fact.

Tandoori, Byrani, kardhai, curries, all meat dishes, all other vegetable dishes, all kebabs, all naans, everything is Pakistani/Moghal.

if everything indian is actually pakistani then how are pakistanis distinctly not indian, so in other words, pakistanis are claiming that indians are pakistanis and not vice versa, whether you say e= mc2 or mc2 =e, its practically the same thing.

regards

Actually those are just bastardized versions of Mughal/Muslim dishes.

mughal translates to mongol, are you suggesting that indian dishes are actually bastardized mongol dishes ? or central asian for that matter?

what is a ''muslim dish'' tbh? are you somehow suggesting that dishes eaten by muslims in india/pakistan are based on their arabian ancestors?

the so called mughal, uslim dishes have indian origins, so its not surprising that various ''indian'' dishes resemble mughal cuisine, the first mention of curry in north india is also from a gujarati manuscript from 15th cen AD, so its not surprising to find ''islamic curries'' in gujarat as well.

regards

Based on archaeological evidence, 'curry' originates from around 2600-2500 BC in Mohen jo daro. Mustard, fennel, cumin, and tamarind were ground up and cooked with meats.

thats meat seasoning not a curry, curry at the latest appears in a gujarati record in 15th century AD from india, not earlier. there are only indications of stews being from as early as mauryan period and thats about it.

regards
 
. .
Indians don't have any dish... They used to eat leaves and smelly stuff.

Every so called Indian dish nowadays... It's actually Pakistani dishes stolen by the Hindutva. True fact.

Tandoori, Byrani, kardhai, curries, all meat dishes, all other vegetable dishes, all kebabs, all naans, everything is Pakistani/Moghal.

Exactly. Sorry to say this, but Muslim empires brought civilization to these half-naked tree and hut people. Even the concept of marriage was a result of Muslim influence, otherwise it was free love like monkeys.

Only with British help were they able to become Hindu and British handed it to them on a platyer, otherwise their credentials to rule are lacking.
 
.
Exactly. Sorry to say this, but Muslim empires brought civilization to these half-naked tree and hut people. Even the concept of marriage was a result of Muslim influence, otherwise it was free love like monkeys.

you should probably remove islam from your name its giving bad impression about islam, you neo nazi racist, lying bigot.

regards
 
.
you should probably remove islam from your name its giving bad impression about islam, you neo nazi racist, lying bigot.

regards

Yes, I insulted your race and country. You should feel bad.

Maybe think again next time you come with Pakistani flags insulting the origin of civilization that was our Indus.

Islam civilized India, otherwise it was a free for all with rapist looters like we see with Marathas and the new Hindutva rapist lynch mob masquerading as a country under Moodi.

Neo Nazi, I am not, that is reserved for your RSS cadres who idolize Hitler.

Also racist, I am not, I am just teaching you your actual history.

This was a country, India, which had little clothes, little cuisine, primitive language, no marriage, open fornication, human sacrifice prevalence, and primitive idolatry which is still rampant.

The cesspool of human debauchery would put Qawm e Lut (Sodom, Gomorrah) to shame.

EOAke9jUUAUrAA-.jpeg

Note Modi's shameless artwork of an indecent ancient Indian scene. Some call it a proud history...
 
Last edited:
.
Islam civilized India, otherwise it was a free for all with rapist looters like we see with Marathas and the new Hindutva rapist lynch mob masquerading as a country under Moodi.
Name one scientific achievement or philosophical achievement during Mughal times or since 12th century? Anything, mathematics, alchemy, medicine, philosophy. Actually the Mughals decivilized India people went from a country where the exchange of great ideas originated and to poverty stricken, clotheless people that was the situation of Mughal empire when Brits arrived at the shores of Bengal, these are from British accounts.
There was no Aryabhata, brahmagupta, or Chanakya after 12th century.
Civilized my foot.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom