ANPP
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 819
- Reaction score
- -1
Cruise missile defense capability
Last century was victim of nuclearization of south Asia, and hence ballistic missile became prime asset of nuclear deterrent for twice of country. But now in 21st century doctrine is shifting at great speed, as India moves towards BMD system and near to field BDM and phase two of BMD will start very soon. And also Detection of ballistic missile is very easy due to satellites, sophisticates radar systems.
Now doctrine is shifting towards cruise missiles. They fly very low, stealthier than full flag a/c due to small size, nuclear capable, and identification of such missiles is really hard. Cruise missiles are highly cost effective compare to ballistic missiles. Cruise missile can be used for targeting key strategic targets & even for nuclear deterrence. Pakistan inducted Babur(haft7) in its arsenal in 2010. They also have air launched variant of it Raad(haft8) and Working on submarine launched & ship launch variants of missile. They completed several successful test in past. Now I think as we are near to field BMD shield, cruise missiles posses real threat to India in any case of war.
Current feasibility of cruise missile deterrence
India currently uses older variants of the Russian SAMs mainly SA6 gainful. Few key strategic points are secure by much better Spyder system.
Although thats doesnt show Indias original SAM network, but it is enough to show the Holes in SAM network of India. Cruise missiles fly at very low altitude & have train hugging capability. Curvature of earth and shadow regions of radar gives opportunity to cruise missiles which are unrealistic in ballistic missiles. India also has 3 awacs systems which multiply its monitoring capability.
As per state India doesnt have sophisticated defensive approach towards cruise missile defense. So India must need to follow counter offensive and counter defensive approach for cruise missile. Prioritized and target possible enemy offensive system, so that their capability of offence will cripple in initaia phase of war. Sukhoi 30 mki, mirag2000, and Jaguar give India the capability of counter offensive approach inside enemy territory in intial phase of war. Now in counter defensive approach, centralization of all radar and SAM network is great doctrine. As all civilian radar system are now integrated to IAF network. So strategy should be focus on destruction of missile within border by aircrafts in flight rather than relay on CIWS and QRSAM. Mki give India feasibility due to their radar. It can work as mini awacs in war and can identify enemy cruise missiles, Once missiles are identified than they can destroyed by mean of a/c(want to illustrate especially AJT).
Cruise missile doctrine also based on what type on platform is used by enemy. So far 4 kind of weapon delivery methods are in world.
Aircraft launch In this doctrine speed is a key, a/c must need to go as near/inside to border so that inner areas could be targeted. No surprise element and highly venerable to enemy attack. Good rate of fire could be achieved.
Surface vessel launch As everybody know, no surprise element but can fire salve/combo of missiles. These are also highly protected, but cannot get near to sea lane enemy.
TEL launch Main asset of army for cruise missiles. These can be put much near to border without detections and can surprise with salve/combo of missile, although they neither have speed nor defensive approach & highly venerable after detection.
Submarine launch They are full of surprise but lack in fire rate and if detected than surely dead.
Last century was victim of nuclearization of south Asia, and hence ballistic missile became prime asset of nuclear deterrent for twice of country. But now in 21st century doctrine is shifting at great speed, as India moves towards BMD system and near to field BDM and phase two of BMD will start very soon. And also Detection of ballistic missile is very easy due to satellites, sophisticates radar systems.
Now doctrine is shifting towards cruise missiles. They fly very low, stealthier than full flag a/c due to small size, nuclear capable, and identification of such missiles is really hard. Cruise missiles are highly cost effective compare to ballistic missiles. Cruise missile can be used for targeting key strategic targets & even for nuclear deterrence. Pakistan inducted Babur(haft7) in its arsenal in 2010. They also have air launched variant of it Raad(haft8) and Working on submarine launched & ship launch variants of missile. They completed several successful test in past. Now I think as we are near to field BMD shield, cruise missiles posses real threat to India in any case of war.
Current feasibility of cruise missile deterrence
India currently uses older variants of the Russian SAMs mainly SA6 gainful. Few key strategic points are secure by much better Spyder system.
Although thats doesnt show Indias original SAM network, but it is enough to show the Holes in SAM network of India. Cruise missiles fly at very low altitude & have train hugging capability. Curvature of earth and shadow regions of radar gives opportunity to cruise missiles which are unrealistic in ballistic missiles. India also has 3 awacs systems which multiply its monitoring capability.
As per state India doesnt have sophisticated defensive approach towards cruise missile defense. So India must need to follow counter offensive and counter defensive approach for cruise missile. Prioritized and target possible enemy offensive system, so that their capability of offence will cripple in initaia phase of war. Sukhoi 30 mki, mirag2000, and Jaguar give India the capability of counter offensive approach inside enemy territory in intial phase of war. Now in counter defensive approach, centralization of all radar and SAM network is great doctrine. As all civilian radar system are now integrated to IAF network. So strategy should be focus on destruction of missile within border by aircrafts in flight rather than relay on CIWS and QRSAM. Mki give India feasibility due to their radar. It can work as mini awacs in war and can identify enemy cruise missiles, Once missiles are identified than they can destroyed by mean of a/c(want to illustrate especially AJT).
Cruise missile doctrine also based on what type on platform is used by enemy. So far 4 kind of weapon delivery methods are in world.
Aircraft launch In this doctrine speed is a key, a/c must need to go as near/inside to border so that inner areas could be targeted. No surprise element and highly venerable to enemy attack. Good rate of fire could be achieved.
Surface vessel launch As everybody know, no surprise element but can fire salve/combo of missiles. These are also highly protected, but cannot get near to sea lane enemy.
TEL launch Main asset of army for cruise missiles. These can be put much near to border without detections and can surprise with salve/combo of missile, although they neither have speed nor defensive approach & highly venerable after detection.
Submarine launch They are full of surprise but lack in fire rate and if detected than surely dead.