ares
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2010
- Messages
- 5,483
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
But Indian democratically elected sign Shimla Agreement and accepted Indian Held Kashmir A Disputed Territory . So here we are discussing the atrocities of invaders in disputed occupied territory...Hope that is more then enough to understand the sentiments of Kashmiri people.
That is a massive distortion of facts..no such thing was accepted by either side.What was accepted was sanctity of line of control and neither side will try to change LOC by force(which as a matter of fact you already violated in 1999.
India does not recognize Kashmir as disputed territory..however UN resolution do..
Therefore for the sake of being objective, let us assume that Kashmir is a disputed territory.
One thing you should be absolutely clear about ..disputed territory is not equal to occupied territory.
Nowhere does it say on UN resolution or for that matter any other legal document, that Kashmir is an Occupied territory!!
Therfore any armed militancy in Kashmir against the state or its subjects, will fall in the category of terrorism and not freedom fighting, as many Pakistani try to portray.
"UNGA Resolution 2649 on the right of populations to resist "occupation" is not applicable in Kashmir for simple reason, that it not an occupied territory.
Or tell me this, AJK and GB which have same status under UN resolutions as J&K ..are occupied territories too ??