No one is questioning Military's capabilities
Yes you cant, as there is no doubt in military's capability of any sort, so just please stop repeating 'universal truths'
its a one of the worlds most organised and profesional force , they can kick enemies *** ..... and are the defending champs .. there is no doubt in anyones mind !!!
Thnks again, refer above for a complete reply!
but when it comes to civilians and businesses the army shouldnt interfere
Interfere? How?
Did the military asked CEO of Mobilik to hand over the charge so that an army General can run that company?
No if you are talking about the appointment of RETIRED army officers in the private sector, then dude you need to understand the servic cum retirenent age cum military officer's capability cum requiremnemt of private firm dynamics, but i cant give it to you now as you uptake is obstrated by your biased brain. All the Army officers who retire before the age of 60 are abosrbed in the private sector, so? What's wrong with it? The retirement age in OPakistan is 60 and anyone can do a job till that age, no matter how many times he has been 'retire' previously, and ofcourse the military dude who retired before the actual retirement age i.e. 60 has to work as he is still capable of working and has all the needs to be fulfilled as any other civilain of his age. Officers join the Army usually at the age of 18-20, 2 years in PMA by 20-22 they are officers and another 25 (maximum, most go home before that) years till his retire as a Major (most/bulk of the oficer), so 45-47 is the normal retirement age, so do you want them to sit, watch tv and read news paper? A Major who retires at the age of 40 would be having his kids around 15-18 years, so now you want that major to pay for his childrern's schooling/college/higer studies from his pension? Lovelu isnt it?
BTW, why dont you suggest all the private companies to the various multi-national comapnies in Pakistan to STOP recruuiting retired Army officers, who by the way prefer them you to their experience, man management skill and motivation/dedication to work. Let's see how many listen to you!
As for the generals sitting at top slots in the private sector: Yes a fw of them are debatable as they may have been fitted in by Mush and many other, but majority is again there at its own. Though i missed to mention that Mush still claims that those appointments were on merit basis, but its another topic an i dont want my already ruined thread to me ruined any more.
BTW, i can give you the example of Pak Steel who was in loss since long and the Army dude brought it back as the most profitable mill. People were not ready to take charge of Pak Steel when that Lt Col was appointed there.
and should halt all its commercial activities completly.
Why should it?
Does it hinder Army's fighting capability? NO
Does it hurts country's economy? NO
Does it adds in unemployment or lowers it? It reduces the unemployment rate actually.
Does it stop other companies to 'proper'? NO
Is it not paying the taxes? Yes it always ahs been.
Does the profit of these companies being used in 'unwanted; activities? No they are audit able and registered and are completely transparent as any other commercial outlets!
So why would it bother you Excellency's brains, actually? Just for the sake of it i guess.
Once armed forces are full time into what they do best ""Defence""
Lolz... here;s lies the fault, you again need to understand that these commercial activities are in no way 'stopping' the Army to do its primary job as it has dedicated people (civilians) to do the job for the military. Now if you think that if one general who just overlook these commercial activities (which actually is symbolic) can jeopardize the Army's fighting capability you need to see the
doc again!