Skies
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2009
- Messages
- 4,094
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Perhaps I understand your concern. IMO an Islamic government doesn't have to be bigotic and there might be a way to retain many modern values within an Islamic system, but the kind of blind loyalty to traditional Islamic rules and rulings that makes certain people follow an Islamic party is itself a potential cause/source of bigotism. However logical or valid these people are not going to give a damn to your individual understanding of Islam or an Islamic state. They would perhaps think it fitting that an Islamic ruler should and must impose a particular lifestyle on people (as opposed to 'Islam by example') despite the counterproductivity of such measures. Moreover it would be really frustrating if these people would be trying to solve all twenty first century problems simply by analyzing seventh century solutions to seventh century problems.
That is why [practically speaking] Islam has to be out of state affairs. Because different people are of different types, and religion is a matter of believe and practice. If some Islamic ruler wants Islam to be practiced more tightly than the citizens, it will create a problem. So if people practice Islam in individual level, not in national level, then some may practice tightly, some may practice loosely, but that will not impact the national life.
But an Islamic party is fine if it comes with people's mandate, and democratically, then practicing Islam in national level will not create national problem.