COLDHEARTED AVIATOR
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 5,052
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Show me the map.Add 1948, 1965 and Kargil as well
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Show me the map.Add 1948, 1965 and Kargil as well
Show me the map.
Its simple..It is due to their education. Full of lies!
in 1965 the reason was Kashmir the war was fought to take Kashmir. Not to defend Lahore LOL! Some one please explain them.
How cleverly their army fooled their people that they succeeded in defending Lahore. And in all this all of them forgot the main motive to fight the war.
Please Add Sirji Kal strikes of 2016 as well----Because i love when smelly vegitabales A$$ is on fire because of their ignorancewhy you pakistanis want to mention all those wars which you lost and get humiliated everytime?
You are indian, don't act smartShow me the map.
Yeaah we started celebrating in 2015 a war which we lost in 1965, and make fool the whole world with Sirji kal strikesIt is due to their education. Full of lies!
in 1965 the reason was Kashmir the war was fought to take Kashmir. Not to defend Lahore LOL! Some one please explain them.
How cleverly their army fooled their people that they succeeded in defending Lahore. And in all this all of them forgot the main motive to fight the war.
Yeaah we started celebrating in 2015 a war which we lost in 1965, and make fool the whole world with Sirji kal strikes
Stupid keyboard wariors
mass brainwashing m8 nothing new, in 1971 after getting landslide by the Indian military in just 17 days , even days before they surrendered their media were reporting Pakistan were winning and India suffered some xxx amount of loss every day , its funny really i get the same vibe from north Korea ,take a look at this.It is due to their education. Full of lies!
in 1965 the reason was Kashmir the war was fought to take Kashmir. Not to defend Lahore LOL! Some one please explain them.
How cleverly their army fooled their people that they succeeded in defending Lahore. And in all this all of them forgot the main motive to fight the war.
mass brainwashing m8 nothing new, in 1971 after getting landslide by the Indian military in just 17 days , even days before they surrendered their media were reporting Pakistan were winning and India suffered some xxx amount of loss every day , its funny really i get the same vibe from north Korea ,take a look at this.
this is the definition of propaganda
lol their goverment claimed they were making peace talks with Bangladesh and ordering Indians to leave , after freaking surrendering to india with 90,000+ POW surrendered . Bangladesh was officially declared as a country on December 16 1971, bhutto said this on 20th dec 1971
brain washing ads
COLD START: INDIA TO DEPLOY MASSIVE TANK ARMY ALONG BORDER WITH PAKISTAN
FRIDAY, JANUARY 20, 2017 BY INDIANDEFENSE NEWS
by Franz-Stefan Gady
The Indian Army is set to deploy over 460 new T-90SM main battle tanks (MBTs) along India’s border with Pakistan, senior Indian defense officials told IHS Jane’s Defense Weekly on January 19.
The new T-90SM MBT (other designations T-90AM or T-90MS) is the latest and most modern version of the T-90 (which in turn is a modernized variant of the T-72 MBT), and has specifically been designed for export by Russia.
According to IHS Jane’s Defense Weekly, the newly ordered MBTs will supplement 850-900 license-built T-90S Bhishma tanks, divided into 18 regiments, and currently deployed in the Indian states of Rajasthan and Punjab. It is unclear how many T-90S and T-90SM in total are currently in service with the Indian Army. (Estimates vary from 800 to 1,200 MBTs in various stages of operational readiness.)
The new MBTs will be equipped with new thermal imagining sights and will be divided up into ten new regiments.
India has been mulling the purchase of 464 T-90SM MBTs for the past year. According to an Indian media report from November 2016, the contract “will include a Make-in-India element for integration at the Heavy Vehicles Factory in Avadi near Chennai.” However, the purchase has not yet been cleared by the Defense Acquisition Council, headed by Indian Defense Minister Manohar Parrikar.
The Indian Army already maintains a sizable tank force along the India-Pakistan border. However, the recent news that New Delhi intends to modernize its tanks formations along the border could indicate that India continues to methodically implement its so-called Cold Start Doctrine of limited conventional war with Pakistan.
This doctrine, which as The Diplomat reported has never been officially acknowledged until recently, calls for swift and decisive conventional offensive operations into Pakistani territory before the international community can intercede, and before Pakistan would feel compelled to launch tactical nuclear retaliatory strikes in the event of an invasion.
Tanks play a pivotal role in Cold Start as they are the key offensive assets to launch limited but rapid armored thrusts into Pakistani territory supported by mechanized infantry formations and air power within 48-72 hours at the outset of a military confrontation with Islamabad.
A number of military maneuvers over the past decade has shown that the Indian Army’s reliance on its so-called three Strike Corps (each consisting of two armored and one infantry division with approximately 450 MBTs per corps) to conduct Cold Start offensives took away the surprise element–the key ingredient in such Blitzkrieg-style operations–given that they were slow to mobilize and stationed too far in the interior of India.
As a result, the Indian Army decided to implement structural and organizational changes. First, it decided to prop up its defensive corps (so-called Pivot Corps) stationed along the border with Pakistan with new offensive elements: division-sized integrated battle groups (IBG) consisting of artillery, armor, and aviation elements capable of limited offensive operations.
Second, the Indian Army also decided to dis-aggregate the three strike corps into division-sized IBGs and station them closer to the border. These IBGs, equipped with artillery, armored personnel carriers, MBTs, and infantry fighting vehicles, would be capable of launching limited strikes (50-80 kilometers deep) into enemy territory supported by air power.
To date, these changes have only partially been implemented due to a number of reasons including logistical problems and shortages of key equipment (e.g., self-propelled artillery). It is likely that the newly ordered T-90SM MBTs will be used for the IBGs. However, the MBTs alone will not suffice to put the Cold Start Doctrine from what up till now primarily appears to be a concept into actual reality.
http://www.indiandefensenews.in/2017/01/cold-start-india-to-deploy-massive-tank.html
I wonder what the consequences will be of Pak using a nuke first.
I can imagine a raid by USA on Pakistan.
US nuking Pakistan on behalf of India is the only nuclear detterance, India can flutter after failed pokhran.
A country with not even one third of Indias patent of intellectual property in physics and engineering sciences claim to have more expertise in nuclear tech and calls Indian Nuclear program a dud.
Congratulations, you are blessed.
For Pakistan, TN is not required. Small tactical fission is sufficient to keep the deterance.
http://www.indiandefensenews.in/2016/03/indias-missile-program-in-peril-as-army.html
After 32 years and over `1,000 crore later, the Akash missile system, crafted by India’s white elephant DRDO to protect the country from possible aerial threats, has been declared a dud by the Indian Army
Is this AKASH you are refering to or some other AKASH sitting in call centre and acting as a missile..
For Pakistan, TN is not required. Small tactical fission is sufficient to keep the deterance.
Even if it failed which is not the case, and it was deliberately discussed so that our leaders dont sign CTbT or NPT during US nuclear deal.
Now if it has failed India has right to test it again hehehe.
Lol. In 2005 India was doing diplomatic efforts to lift all the sanctions on India which were put after 98. And and genius lkke you is suggesting to do the test.If any improvements were made, you'd have already tested it without seekign Pakistan persmissions.
Where as Pakistan have perfected its second strike capability.... which perhaps is miundestood by Indians as a single shot.