CNN Interview with Imran Khan: Assassination Attempt on the ex-Prime Minister by the Establishment and PDM

[VCheng]

Who says it is hearsay? Just that he has evidence from informants.

Please read my post again with comprehension, if able.

Hearsay is not evidence, but he claims to have evidence (hence it cannot be mere hearsay but something more). However, nothing has been shown yet.

That is all I have said.

Code for.... NRO and appeasement of corruption.

Never!

Most of his fanbase finds that lack of diplomacy an endearing quality, yes.

 

[epebble]

Lets make it clear for the naive.

He has evidence- that of internal informants. After mentioning this, the army went on a purge to remove all pro PTI elements.

Ofc, he will not highlight this again. So he will say- look I pointed out what would happen well before this. And the motivation.

Becky is asking stupid questions- as if he would release what evidence he has.

Suppose IK places a pixelated YouTube video or audio (maybe digitally altered voice) of the PM or minister, or military telling the assassin to go and attempt to shoot at IK when he comes to .... at ..... time and we will be paying 200,000 rupees for this work, do you think he had to work this hard to convince Becky?

 

[Ssan]

Please read my post again with comprehension, if able.

Hearsay is not evidence, but he claims to have evidence (hence it cannot be mere hearsay but something more). However, nothing has been shown yet.

That is all I have said.

Out of curiosity, what is it that you think I have said. I only mentioned hearsay because you said so- That “hearsay is not evidence.” Okay, but who says he only has hearsay?

 

[VCheng]

Okay, but who says he only has hearsay?

I have not said that, so whether others say it or not is none of my concern. He may have something more, or not. Nothing has been shown yet. He may have it. He may not.

(He was never able to show the famous cipher either.)

 

[Jango]

Does anyone think his evidence is admissible in any criminal court/trial? Generally, criminal courts look for proof beyond reasonable doubt. His comments can at best be described as suspicions.

So you think he is going to present the admissible evidence on a show with Becky Anderson and not in court itself?

 

[Ssan]

Suppose IK places a pixelated YouTube video or audio (maybe digitally altered voice) of the PM or minister, or military telling the assassin to go and attempt to shoot at IK when he comes to .... at ..... time and we will be paying 200,000 rupees for this work, do you think he had to work this hard to convince Becky?

At some level, he has done enough. He predicted the attempted assassination. What they would say was the motivation.

And how the players have acted afterwards. How the Punjab police took the slower road. How the helicopter didn’t show up. How the video was released in half an hour. How they tried to pass it off as a single shooter even though everyone on site says more than one. How the videos are being released and the IG doesn’t know from where.

How the journalists were tortured. How Azam swati affair played out. How PTI also made similar claims for Arshad Sharif. How the govt pressurized Arshad Sharif at home. Removed him from Dubai. How he got assassinated in Kenya point blank like a dog.

Sorry but at some level, anyone with half a brain cell already gets it. If you don’t get it even now, I’ll pray for your hidayat.

 

[REhorror]

Hopefully this means IK will retake powers!

 

[Ghazwa-e-Hind]

CNN is like Geo/Jang group of west.

Still, Khan responded well to the questions.

It felt as if Interviewer host Becky Anderson was being spokesperson of assassins/PDM/handlers, poor journalism ethics, biased.

 

[epebble]

So you think he is going to present the admissible evidence on a show with Becky Anderson and not in court itself?

Sometimes the court of public opinion can achieve what a court of law cannot. Criminal court needs proof beyond reasonable doubt for conviction. Court of public opinion just needs credible evidence. A Youtube video will work wonders. Nixon did not resign because he was convicted by a court. The tapes did it.

 

[Ghazwa-e-Hind]

Sometimes the court of public opinion can achieve what a court of law cannot. Criminal court needs proof beyond reasonable doubt for conviction. Court of public opinion just needs credible evidence. A Youtube video will work wonders. Nixon did not resign because he was convicted by a court. The tapes did it.

Wait few days, the people who attempted assassination of Khan will email high-definition video of their planning, motives and strategy to the courts.

A netflix movie will be released too starring Mark Wahlberg.

As a bonus, the assassins will also surrender themselves under the law, to release the falsely accused person (decoy, whose confession was released minutes after firing, without FIR or any investigation)

Happy?

 

[Ghazwa-e-Hind]

Here the name of Maj Gen cannot be added in FIR and Idiots are asking for evidence from IK.

Most of these anti-PTI people on PDF are paid employees of a Drama & song company (bots).

u get answers to your question .

Even if you present them with 1,000 evidences, written proofs, footages, they wont believe.

Because their loyalty resides with $$$

 

[Ssan]

I have not said that, so whether others say it or not is none of my concern. He may have something more, or not. Nothing has been shown yet. He may have it. He may not.

(He was never able to show the famous cipher either.)

On this thread, the first person to mention hearsay is your post- post #41 for your reference.

Everything else you have said so far is a tautology. “He may or may not have it.” Sure, not interesting, but sure.

 

[Ghazwa-e-Hind]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1588541822229700609

 

[Jango]

Sometimes the court of public opinion can achieve what a court of law cannot. Criminal court needs proof beyond reasonable doubt for conviction. Court of public opinion just needs credible evidence. A Youtube video will work wonders. Nixon did not resign because he was convicted by a court. The tapes did it.

I know where you are coming from, but the court of public opinion has been screaming and wailing for the past 6 months, but the establishment hasn't moved an inch.

Things in Pakistan seldom move through public opinion.

Taking the Nixon example, our whole top leadership, military and civilian would have resigned had they possessed a quarter of the moral compass of Nixon.

 

[Abdul Rehman Majeed]

"What is your evidence, Sir?"

He presented none. He even backtracked on the number of people he accused, and accused the intelligence agency of videos, Very interesting.

IK is the victim, the investigator and the Judge.