Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apne sare baapo ko mention karna zaroori he ?
Speaker’s Ruling Can’t Be Challenged Under Article 69: FM Qureshi
Speaker’s ruling can’t be challenged under Article 69: FM Qureshi
Former Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi on Thursday said that under Article 69 of the Constitution, the ruling of the speaker could not be challenged.Speaking during the presser outside the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Shah Mahmood Qureshi said thnation.com.pk
PTI was abusing judiciary not long ago
Pakistan ranks lowly 130 out of 139 countries in Rule of Law Index 2021
@SD.10
@PakSarZameen47
@Strike!
@Arsenal Caan
@Pindi Boy
@Waterboy
@JunaidP
@Al-zakir
@rashid.sarwar
@ghazi52
@AZ1
@The SC
@Hydration
@Genius 17
@arslank03
@Enigma SIG
@Acetic Acid
@Dr. Strangelove
@TheSnakeEatingMarkhur
@Catalystic
@DoubleYouSee
@PakPak
@waz
@Zeshan.Ibrahim
@Major Sam
@Cent4
@Luosifen
@Steppe Wolff
@Ahmadbhutta01
@Ghostkiller
@Shafsins
@Lava820
@PadmaBridge
@EDIR NO LIVED
@Darth Vader
@Nadeem Ganjum
@IbnAbdullah
@Johny D
@Goenitz
@Bilal.
@CrimeMinister
@iLION12345_1
@Oruc
@zn426
@Tomcats
@PWFI
@Sal12
@PayBack
Pervaiz Ilahi should simply kick Shujaat Husain out of chairmanship of PMLQ and bring vote of no confidence against Kukri. Simple as.
Even Wajahat Hussains son tweeted against his chacha Shujaat and Zardari.
No wait for SC
That'll be quick
Deputy speaker will delay the voting on VONC for 2 weeks
I think you just shared it without reading
True.Khandan to pakka toot gaya hai.
Ch Shujaat is old, and his son won from Chakwal. Gujrat, jo in ki ancestral seat hai, us par it is the Elahi family that is strong.
So they are as good as gone.
Thanks for the clarity, although i think the lack of specification by the SC as in their lack of mention of parliamentary head still means it's open to interpretation.You are mixing two things:
1- Voting in the assembly.
2- Declaration of defection.
According to the law, the voting of the member in the assembly is to be done according to the directions of the parliamentary party. This is the parliamentary head.
Now, if the member does not vote according to the parliamentary head, then the parliamentary head can write to the 'party' head and then the 'party' head declare him defected.
So, to declare someone as defected, the 'party' head is the authorized person.
But how will he declare someone defected? Only when he goes against the 'parliamentary' party.
I quoted the relevant sentence in the above quoted post. The bold part says 'declaration', which of defection.
Aitzaz Ahsan was on TV (ARY) and he explained the 'wisdom of the law'. In this case, the reason both steps are given to two different people is because in an ideal democracy, the party head looks over ALOT of affairs across the board, while the parliamentary party is more suited for deciding upon affairs within the assembly. So that is why, the parliamentary party should decide what to vote for within the assembly. The reason the declaration for defection is in the hands of the 'party' head is because the party head can take note of all the affairs which led to a member not voting according to the direction given. He may have COVID, or a broken leg, or in hospital, or whatever. There can be any compulsion that he couldn't vote, and the parliamentary leader cannot be made aware of those circumstances because he looks over parliamentary affairs, not those outside.
Hope you understand.
Thanks for the clarity, although i think the lack of specification by the SC as in their lack of mention of parliamentary head still means it's open to interpretation.