Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You have a source for the weight of the warhead?
also, carrier killer seems to be something too far fetched. This missile seems close to Kh15 in performance, wouldn't you agree?
any report when pakistan will test this missile
you do understand that its moronic to think that a 900 kg missile can have a 400 kg warhead. warhead weight must probably be around 100 kg.
nothing on that but 10 missiles already in service as of 2012
Pakistan commissioned a new develop missile without test launch? interesting
missiles are not in service
thanks for agreeing with me that it is similar to kh 15. your pakistani compatriots think that i am a fool when i tell them that the technology of the missile is from 70s.
@Secur
Anyways what i am interested is its seeker, the jane article mentioned many options seeker, so are we saying IR for low value targets and RF for high value, or does it uses both seekers simultaneously, like R27?
Show me the proof of "operational".
Are you saying that the missile performance is of 70s but its technology is of 2013?
That statement doesn't make sense, the world has moved away from ballistic anti ship missiles.
Can you please explain " missile can be pre-programmed with digital imagery in the TR mode"?
So, a new gem, Pakistan buys a foreign new developed system without trail
So, a new gem, Pakistan buys a foreign new developed system without trail
Are you stupid or pretending to be one?
@notorious_eagle
What does the SIPRI database tells us about the orders and delivery of the said missile ? Too slow to check it out by myself .
So, manufacturer tests certified by buyers instead of self testing. This is a logical question neither stupid nor funny.