You are correct.
True.
This bill is a rape of human rights. Throwing out of house, wearing wrist band (کڑا ) , confiscating firearm, paying compensations, and so on.
Most of the pdf'ers are expirates. Can they mention any Western law which bears resemblance to this law?
The fanatical supporters of this law on pdf have already assumed that this law will protect "opressed" women from their "maniac" husbands. However, it isn't always like that---women aren't always opressed and husbands aren't always maniacs in Pakistan.
It looks like Pakistan is going the way of western radical feminism in some regards. If a woman indeed throw the husband out of the house or the husband must pay alimony, etc, this will eventually kill the institution of marriage in Pakistan. This has what's killed marriage in western countries, because men do not marry since their wife can take over their house, men lose at least half their wealth, have to pay half their income to their wife and lose the kids as well. If Pakistan goes this way, which it sounds like it is, then you can say good bye to the institution of marriage in the long term.
As per the statistics collected from all over Pakistan, How many men killed women for honor killings and how many women killed their men for honor killing in last year alone ?
Just thought I'd bring up a different statistic for you: Hope Solo and the Surprising Truth About Women and Violence
In Pakistan there's likely very little research in domestic violence. But even in western countries where it is commonly assumed that men commit nearly all of the domestic violence (a myth parroted by feminist-controlled education system and media), it turns out that half of domestic violence is actually committed by women. So don't be surprised if an unbiased study not funded by interest groups finds similar results in Pakistan in the future.
Women are physically weaker and precisely thats why a softer law is applied for domestic voilence so that males before going bonkers at home would think twice of the consequences .. Before they could get away scot free as it was not a offence.
Sorry dude, I think you are forgetting that women have access to weapons such as knives or household objects they can use against men. It's not an animal world here where only way to attack someone is to use your body parts.
1. Eviction of the abusive husband from the house, irrespective of who owns it, is meant to be a protection for the wife and a deterrent for the perpetrator of the crime. A woman should not have to worry about where she will have to sleep and live (especially if there are children involved) after reporting an abusive husband to the police. The fact of the matter is that in most societies, especially Pakistan, men will be safer and more easily able to find accommodation outside their own home than women will. The burden on children who will have to also leave the house with the wife to escape an abusive husband will be enormous. The law, while not being perfect on this particular point, is taking the least damaging route in requiring the husband accused of abuse to be evicted.
Sorry, I have to disagree here. If the state thinks that the woman needs protection then they can provide the protection themselves. It is completely illogical, inhumane, and counter intuitive to kick someone out of their own house just based on a complaint. I also don't see how men will have an easier time finding alternative accommodation compared to the woman. There are women's shelters included in this bill or they can find accommodation with an acquaintance.
Is this bill gender neutral or does it apply only the female victims of these crimes?