Tiki Tam Tam
<b>MILITARY PROFESSIONALS</b>
- Joined
- May 15, 2006
- Messages
- 9,330
- Reaction score
- 0
I urge you to change your perspective.
Try to analyze this as a clash of civilizations. Think of the year 700 AD. Islam is a new religion, and the entire region from Central Asia to S/E Asia is under hindu/buddhist culture.
When Islamic conquerers entered the region, they wiped out the indegenous traditions of Afghanistan and Central Asia, and most of Pakistan.
Then, they created this new Islamic state, which was totally at odds with the earlier one.
Now, for a variety of reasons, none of which were the magnamity of the foreigners, they were unable to convert the whole of the Indian population. Perhaps partly because of the sheer number of people, and partly because of the fragmented nature of Hindu society.
So Hinduism in North India withdrew into a shell, devoid of political power and patronage, while Islamic culture flourished.
Obviously, the Islamic rulers brought with them some new ideas, in the field of architecture for example.
But the indegenous people could do nothing to benefit from this, because in order to join this new culture, they would have to completely give up their own.
On top of that, Islamic conquerers are well known for their bloodthristy nature. It is not without reason that Islam spread like wildfire to most of Asia, within just 300 years!!
Look, I am not saying that only the Muslims were cruel. The Spanish conquests of south america could definitely compete with the Muslims. But one must note an important similarity between the spanish and the muslims....the monotheist nature of their religion. The Spanish conquests too were of a religious nature.
Thank you.
I am a man of peace.
I have seen enough of bloodshed and I realise it is those who have from the rear and who have not actually done a damn are the ones who kill each other over stupid reasons.
Applicable to the brave ones on this forum, irrespective of nationality.