chinese withdrawal

[Spring Onion]

for last few days, those clueless indians barking on PDF that PLA 'intruded' their 'territory'``

but this time why those indian yahos also withdrew from that area? it doenst make any sense``lol



do they have any in this modern time``?

i thought all they have are either direct imports or assembly of direct imported parts

The Chinese banner asking Indians "Go Back" was a fun to read.

They (Indians) withdrew from the area as well and the funniest thing is that they say its their own area so one wonders why they have to leave their area in the first place?

There is alot on store. India had assured China that Indian LAC violation infrastructure will be discussed in forthcoming talks between the two countries.

 

[Matrixx]

USA will be really happy now....that they can now easily convince India to form a group against China....bad news to Asia...thanks to China

 

[nair]

USA will be really happy now....that they can now easily convince India to form a group against China....bad news to Asia...thanks to China

I dont think india will fall to that trap...... But this option can be used as a Stick in diplomacy......

 

[Storm Force]

Chinease backed down .....they bottled it. Paper dragon.

 

[Srinivas]

The Chinese banner asking Indians "Go Back" was a fun to read.

They (Indians) withdrew from the area as well and the funniest thing is that they say its their own area so one wonders why they have to leave their area in the first place?

There is alot on store. India had assured China that Indian LAC violation infrastructure will be discussed in forthcoming talks between the two countries.

There is nothing in the store, There won't be any dismantling of infrastructure but build up will be more with more pace.

Thing is for China if they do not go back they will loose the

bilateral trade,(any way we will out do chinese goods in our market in the coming years)

peace in the Himalayan border (they have to tie close to 10 lakhs soldiers if they want to claim senkakus)

India-Japan_USA trilateral defense pact (night mare for chinese)

And last but not the least they are angering another Giant unnecessarily.

The trip of Salman Kushid and Chinese PM what ever his name will be cancelled


They came close to our borders calling it as their land and when India retaliates they ran, funny indeed.

 

[grey boy 2]

80000 vs 10000/12000 wow.... chinese soldiers are very brave they fought 8:1.............. but 1697 wounded and 722 killed.... what an achievement sir g...



.

Hmm, since you're asking for it, this was the original casualties figures before it got edited two times by Indians. enjoy pal

Dreams and Realizations: July 2009

I cannot see the Causality Figure in 3rd Pic???? Photoshop????

Are you accusing me for being a liar? Have you notice the "Both side showed military restraint"? remark?
Now, go check it out yourself
1987 Sino-Indian skirmish - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Fuego]

Mighty and Richie Rich Chinese ran away from weak and poor country? Man.... china betrayed its loyal cheerleaders.

 

[Mirza Jatt]

China has few more things to lose after this episode. The agreement was the only face save for the chinese...if they were really as brave as described by Chinese members and their pakistani cheerleaders..then they would have surely attacked and taken the post since they too claimed the area to be theirs.

 

[danger007]

Hmm, since you're asking for it, this was the original casualties figures before it got edited two times by Indians. enjoy pal

Dreams and Realizations: July 2009





Are you accusing me for being a liar? Have you notice the "Both side showed military restraint"? remark?
Now, go check it out yourself
1987 Sino-Indian skirmish - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

so your source is blog lol.... all hail then...

 

[IND151]

A three-week long stand-off between Chinese and Indian troopers at the Daulat Beg Oldi sector of Ladakh ended suddenly on Sunday when a People’s Liberation Army platoon withdrew from the Indian territory and returned to their barracks across the Line of Actual Control in Jammu and Kashmir.

According to diplomatic and military sources, the Indian side too reciprocated the gesture of the Chinese and withdrew from the stand-off point back to their pre-April 15 positions, to ensure peace and tranquility along the Sino-Indian border.

The truce, sources said, materialised at the fourth flag meeting between the two militaries after long-drawn negotiations, at various levels.

“Intensive diplomatic contacts led by Foreign Secretary Ranjan Mathai, coordinating with military authorities and (India’s) Ambassador S Jai Shankar in Beijing led to flag meeting in which the face-to-face situation was resolved,” official sources said here late at night.

The dramatic turn of events took place around at 7.30 pm in the evening, and this came about just four days ahead of a scheduled Beijing visit by Union External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid on May 9.

Khurshid is going to China to finalise the programme and agenda for an official visit by Chinese premier Li Keqiang scheduled for May 20.

The Chinese had pitched tents on Debsang bulge in the Daulat Beg Oldi sector of Ladakh, 19 km inside Indian territory from the Indian perception of the LAC on April 15. Indo-Tibetan Police Force (ITBP), which is responsible for the sector’s first line of defence, reciprocated the Chinese move by pitching nine tents of its own. They were joined in the tents by a platoon from the Ladakh Scouts battalion of the Indian Army.

And since then the two sides held three flag meetings to resolve the issue had failed miserably, amid indications that the Chinese were at Debsang bulge’s Raki Nullah for a long haul.

Beijing, all this while, had maintained that their troopers had not transgressed the LAC, whereas the Indian side wanted them to move back to their locations about 25 km away from the stand-off point.

Though both New Delhi and Beijing had confirmed that Khurshid will go ahead with his visit, he himself had expressed doubts over his trip in the wake of the bilateral efforts to resolve the military stand-off in Ladakh not being satisfactory.

With this the UPA Government, which has faced flak for its diplomacy ineptness over both the Chinese and Sarabjit issues, Khurshid’s China visit seems definite.

http://idrw.org/?p=21711

If the report is true then

What happens to those cheerleaders and false flaggers now

They will hide for two to three days now


I pity for their pathetic rants and delusional posts.


@samlove what is your source??

As if the outcome of Italian Marines case was not enough

On Topic> Its very good that the problem finally has been solved.

 

[Spring Onion]

There is nothing in the store, There won't be any dismantling of infrastructure but build up will be more with more pace.

Thing is for China if they do not go back they will loose the

bilateral trade,(any way we will out do chinese goods in our market in the coming years)

peace in the Himalayan border (they have to tie close to 10 lakhs soldiers if they want to claim senkakus)

India-Japan_USA trilateral defense pact (night mare for chinese)

And last but not the least they are angering another Giant unnecessarily.

The trip of Salman Kushid and Chinese PM what ever his name will be cancelled


They came close to our borders calling it as their land and when India retaliates they ran, funny indeed.

All these points will be cleared in future however the visit by Khurshid has No role in the Chinese agreeing to remove tents but bigger assurance from India.

NEW DELHI: Though the Chinese troops' withdrawal ended the stand-off in Ladakh, the Sino-Indian boundary dispute will loom larger in the upcoming bilateral engagement during Chinese Premier Li Keqiang's visit than it would ordinarily have.

According to intelligence sources, prior to the withdrawal, the Chinese were assured by the Indian side that their concerns over the Indian border fortifications that have come up in Chumar, as well as the recent strengthening of infrastructure "too close to the LoC", would be taken up soon at the highest level.

"This may possibly mean that the boundary issue may figure more prominently in Li's upcoming visit to India on May 20," a senior government official told TOI.

Incidentally, the assessment in the security establishment has been that the Chinese incursion, some 19 km into what India perceives as its side of the Line of Actual Control (LAC), was essentially to flag the border demarcation issue and force India to move beyond brushing aside each incursion as a "difference of perception between India and China over LAC."

The Chinese troops' unprecedented act of pitching tents and staying put for days together at the point of incursion, rather than following the laid down border protocol of retreating soon after Indian border troops raise a banner, was possibly to make a point that it was time that the border row was addressed.

The timing was perfect, coming as it did just ahead of Li's visit. In fact, the flagging of concerns over the border fortifications at the earlier flag meetings, the ITBP believes, may have been an after-thought and meant to prolong the stand-off until closer to the Chinese premier's visit.

With the troops finally agreeing to retreat, India expects the tents to be pulled down on Sunday night, resulting in an all-clear by Monday morning. But as officials pointed out, the Chinese appear to have already achieved the purpose behind their latest border provocation: to make the border issue a prominent item on the agenda for Li's visit.


Border row high on bilateral agenda with China now - The Times of India

 

[Srinivas]

All these points will be cleared in future however the visit by Khurshid has No role in the Chinese agreeing to remove tents but bigger assurance from India.

NEW DELHI: Though the Chinese troops' withdrawal ended the stand-off in Ladakh, the Sino-Indian boundary dispute will loom larger in the upcoming bilateral engagement during Chinese Premier Li Keqiang's visit than it would ordinarily have.

According to intelligence sources, prior to the withdrawal, the Chinese were assured by the Indian side that their concerns over the Indian border fortifications that have come up in Chumar, as well as the recent strengthening of infrastructure "too close to the LoC", would be taken up soon at the highest level.

"This may possibly mean that the boundary issue may figure more prominently in Li's upcoming visit to India on May 20," a senior government official told TOI.

Incidentally, the assessment in the security establishment has been that the Chinese incursion, some 19 km into what India perceives as its side of the Line of Actual Control (LAC), was essentially to flag the border demarcation issue and force India to move beyond brushing aside each incursion as a "difference of perception between India and China over LAC."

The Chinese troops' unprecedented act of pitching tents and staying put for days together at the point of incursion, rather than following the laid down border protocol of retreating soon after Indian border troops raise a banner, was possibly to make a point that it was time that the border row was addressed.

The timing was perfect, coming as it did just ahead of Li's visit. In fact, the flagging of concerns over the border fortifications at the earlier flag meetings, the ITBP believes, may have been an after-thought and meant to prolong the stand-off until closer to the Chinese premier's visit.

With the troops finally agreeing to retreat, India expects the tents to be pulled down on Sunday night, resulting in an all-clear by Monday morning. But as officials pointed out, the Chinese appear to have already achieved the purpose behind their latest border provocation: to make the border issue a prominent item on the agenda for Li's visit.


Border row high on bilateral agenda with China now - The Times of India

That do not mean we will not fortify our side, With this incident we will increase the pace of constructions to secure our borders.

" There is an incident which was reported in the media that two Chinese soldiers came on mules to cut the cables of India Chiumar bunker CCTV "

Those guys were warned just before the incident, there is no point in expressing the concerns when the permanent fortifications are well within the Indian Borders.

There is nothing to be worried as Chinese already had done that on their side.

 

[IND151]

No, both sides withdrew from DBO.

This means that India never really believed that DBO was 20 km inside pure Indian territory, and that they now agree that DBO is a part of the disputed region.

Since previously, the Indian government was adamant that DBO was not in the disputed region but rather fully within Indian territory.

As one member pointed out the concerned area gets patrolled and has no bases near border

It was the incursion which forced us to set up tents and deploy soldiers there

Now when Chinese have withdrawn, why Indian troops will live there, in tents?

 

[IND151]

@Sickular Gandhi

They sat on your face for three weeks, if they have left, it would be on their terms....you a$$ only got exposed.....big time.

well lets see

1. We agreed to slow down construction of bunkers not to stop it.

2.India did not agree to stop modernisation of Daulat Beg Oldi and Nayoma airfields in Ladakh, which according to China poses a strategic threat to Karakoram Highway

3.While the Government is willing to give and take on the issue of slowing down construction of bunkers and other developmental works in this region, halting the modernisation of the airfields as part of proposed bargain is ruled out, they said.

 

[Storm Force]

THE CHINEASE HAVE AS MUCH CHANCE of india backing down in LADAKH as the Pakistanis have seen in saichen & kashmir.

what is in indian hands WILL REMAIN in indian hands

THIS IS WHY WE SPEND $40 BILLION a year on our military

WE SAFEGUARD OUR TERRITORY BORDERS * INTERESTS at all costs.

WE RELY ON CHINA for absolutely NOTHING we are STRONG INDEPENDANT NATION

we expect nothing off china AND WE WILL GIVE not an inch