Guynextdoor2
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 12,286
- Reaction score
- -42
- Country
- Location
offcourse you are not convinced, you never will be. the fact that one is flying high and serving and another does not leave the drawing board is for the world to see. regarding AESA, there are options for it including two from china and one from italy. the third block will feature an AESA say if all goes as planned. there have been some surprising additions to blk one and two which no one saw coming. so i anticipate a few surprises for coming blocks as well.
NRIET is promoting one radar that is similar to the one fitted toj-10C.
Another one marketed by NAV technologies that is quite similar to israeli elta 2052 in design and performance.
Chinese Radar Strongly Resembles Israeli Product
third is the italian version of selex vixen series customized for jf-17, already offered by selex few years ago.
This isn't about 'Indians are butthurt about every pak development'. The visible proof of complex projects- money, lots of manpower, tech and in the case of the subcontinent, lots of pain. You don't have any of it, it's too good to be true. As far as AESA is concerned you're once again referrint o intent. You're comparing a system that's incorporating a radome for AESA with one where there is only intent? As @Kachra Seth has referred to, even FBW is not fully developed in JF 17. How do you think you get a fighter that's so cheap?
where does that assumption come from? according to economics having a single supplier makes the supplier slack. We know that to be true...just look at HAL and you'll know what we're referring to.Chines don't do that, they have a pretty good nerve and command system, and everyone knows what they need to do and they do it diligently. We do understand where your assumption come from though.