Chinese progress provokes aggression amongst Indians

[Veer]

That is very strange that india always sets China as its target, economically, militarily, cuturally, in population,etc, always compare to China. Even imagine that Chinese invasion is good for India. What a psycho! So British invasion was good for India?! I see many Indians are grateful to Britain. That's not the way Chinese act. We wont forget the Japanese invasion forever and wont forgive them unless they make a sincerely deeply appologize. Chinese are not that forgetful. Though the history text book intentionally is trying to play down the Outer Mongolia incidence, but every Chinese know the fact that it was part of China before 1946, which was separated by Russia. Though we dont have to take it back like Hong Kong, we won't lose any territory to any country any more.So you should understand why China has such strong will to keep its integrity of territory and sovereignty. Dont expect China forgetting Southern Tibet and Tawang.
Anyway, the integrity of territory is not that important for Indians, for there did not exist such a sovereignty nation called India before the British invasion. So for our friendship, India should return the land occupied by British back to China.

So the great hen now you are showing your real face of a Chinese, I can give you the dose of your medicine but i will be like to respond more reasonably. I can surely reply you in such a manner that you will feel hot coals in your underwear. But there should be a difference between a Indian and a Chinese.

1.) Now Why we (India/Indians) are more alert when it comes to china is simply because you have back stabbed us in past.

2.) Indians believes in forgiveness but we can not forget our disrespect or back stabbers.

3.) You are claiming Mongolia, tomorrow china will claim USA and day after tomorrow China will claim the moon.
Calm down these are all the actions by you people which makes world suspicious of your real intentions.

4.) The Chinese area which are developed currently are only because of the Japanese, if you take out your neck from your well you will see former Japanese colonies like korea and taiwan progressed much earlier than China and they have freedom, human rights and democracy. Also you have received free gift of Hong Kong from Britishers a fully developed international financial hub.
So the great hen chauvinism is biggest myth and communist propaganda.

5.) No.....never India's progeress is only because of the hardwork and efforts of Indians. Bangaluru, Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Gurgaon, Noida, Ahamedabad, Surat etc. are contributing in India's progress because of the handwork of Indians be it a Hindu/Muslim/sikh/christian, tamil/telg/Marathi/Punjabi/bihari/Gujarati.
Britishers have ruled a large part of Africa but Africa have not progress lie India. So, you got your answer.

6.) Recently concluded genetic research shows that some Indians have moved into china and Korea etc. and get settled there. Hence it is scientifically proved that Indians are the fathers of all of Chinese so respect your forefather, don't beg for our land rather merge china with India.

7.) If there was no such thing called India before British invasion then What was Christopher Columbus (c. 1451 – 20 May 1506) doing in the sea 200 year before British came India if not trying to discover the route to India and discovered America.
Kid grow up and try to come out of your well you will see a lot and learn a thing or two.

CAUTION:- For this first you have to leave all of your prejudices and come out of communist propaganda and hen chauvinism.

So stop dreaming about twang and Mongolia, please free Tibet and East Turkmenistan. Stop the killing of Tibetans and Muslims (Uighur)

 

[arya-hind]

 

[arya-hind]

 

[illuminatus]

^^ I can post tons of youtube videos where Indians are abusing the human rights of their own citizens. Let's not get so low.

 

[chinapakistan]

rFxoOrN8MEw[/media] - Urumqi, Uyghur students Killed By Chinese army

Stop trolling, talk about the topic.

 

[remarker]

brother

its not hard to understand we all know India and china are growing but what about Pakistan

is Pakistan growing

 

[illuminatus]

brother

its not hard to understand we all know India and china are growing but what about Pakistan

is Pakistan growing

Why always bring Pakistan into the equation when things aren't going your way? Either stay on topic or don't contribute at all.

 

[illuminatus]

brother

its not hard to understand we all know India and china are growing but what about Pakistan

is Pakistan growing

Why always bring Pakistan into the equation when things aren't going your way? What's the obsession with Pakistan? Either stay on topic or don't contribute at all.

 

[chinapakistan]

brother

its not hard to understand we all know India and china are growing but what about Pakistan

is Pakistan growing

Pakistan's economy do grow, and it is unfair to compaire pakistan with india now, because they are fighting with Taliban for all the world. And pakistan's soldiers are bleeding, pakistan's common people and economy is suffering terrorist for the world. And as a human-being, we should feel shame on our country to let pakistan suffer from these and very very appreciated for what pakistan is doing.

This thread is nothing about economy growth, let us stay on topic.

 

[faithfulguy]

So the great hen now you are showing your real face of a Chinese, I can give you the dose of your medicine but i will be like to respond more reasonably. I can surely reply you in such a manner that you will feel hot coals in your underwear. But there should be a difference between a Indian and a Chinese.

1.) Now Why we (India/Indians) are more alert when it comes to china is simply because you have back stabbed us in past.

2.) Indians believes in forgiveness but we can not forget our disrespect or back stabbers.

3.) You are claiming Mongolia, tomorrow china will claim USA and day after tomorrow China will claim the moon.
Calm down these are all the actions by you people which makes world suspicious of your real intentions.

4.) The Chinese area which are developed currently are only because of the Japanese, if you take out your neck from your well you will see former Japanese colonies like korea and taiwan progressed much earlier than China and they have freedom, human rights and democracy. Also you have received free gift of Hong Kong from Britishers a fully developed international financial hub.
So the great hen chauvinism is biggest myth and communist propaganda.

5.) No.....never India's progeress is only because of the hardwork and efforts of Indians. Bangaluru, Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Gurgaon, Noida, Ahamedabad, Surat etc. are contributing in India's progress because of the handwork of Indians be it a Hindu/Muslim/sikh/christian, tamil/telg/Marathi/Punjabi/bihari/Gujarati.
Britishers have ruled a large part of Africa but Africa have not progress lie India. So, you got your answer.

6.) Recently concluded genetic research shows that some Indians have moved into china and Korea etc. and get settled there. Hence it is scientifically proved that Indians are the fathers of all of Chinese so respect your forefather, don't beg for our land rather merge china with India.

7.) If there was no such thing called India before British invasion then What was Christopher Columbus (c. 1451 – 20 May 1506) doing in the sea 200 year before British came India if not trying to discover the route to India and discovered America.
Kid grow up and try to come out of your well you will see a lot and learn a thing or two.

CAUTION:- For this first you have to leave all of your prejudices and come out of communist propaganda and hen chauvinism.

So stop dreaming about twang and Mongolia, please free Tibet and East Turkmenistan. Stop the killing of Tibetans and Muslims (Uighur)

How come when a Chinese guy shows the fact that India did not exist as a state before British conquest, the India guy goes *** and start talking about free Tibet and Uigers, something which no government recognize except pot smoking morons believe in. Are you a hippie from India?

From a neutral perspective, India's claim on the dispute area along the India/China border is base on British dimplomat Sir Henry McMahon. Its definitely not base on any cultural claim on little statelet that exists before British occupation as these little statelets come and go. However, I do not see any one from India argue from the perspective of British occuation of India as to why the boundary of India is draw today.

The reality is that this line is draw at the time when China was undergoing revolution. British draw the line with forced invasion of Tibet in 1907. Below is the line that link to Simla accord

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simla_Accord_(1914)

"Early British efforts to create a boundary for north east India were triggered by their discovery in the mid-19th century that Tawang, an important trading town, was Tibetan territory. In 1873, the British-run Government of India drew an "Outer Line," intended as an international boundary.[6] This line follows the alignment of the Himalayan foothills, now the southern boundary of Arunachal Pradesh. Britain had concluded treaties with Qing China concerning Tibet's boundaries with Burma[7] and Sikkim.[8] However, Tibet refused to recognize the boundaries drawn by these treaties[citation needed]. British forces led by Sir Francis Younghusband invaded Tibet in 1904 and imposed a treaty on the Tibetans.[9] In 1907, Britain and Russia acknowledged Chinese "suzerainty" over Tibet and both nations "engage[d] not to enter into negotiations with Tibet except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government."[10]"

India's claim on the dispute territory is based on the relic of British aggression. China's insistence on drawing the border according to its view is because it disagree with British imposition of the border base on British emperial arm force in India. On the other side of the coin, India's claim on the disputed territory is base on British imperial agression.

If British never invaded Tibet and force the issue, there would be no border conflict between China and India today.

 

[RAHUL INDIAN]

How come when a Chinese guy shows the fact that India did not exist as a state before British conquest, the India guy goes *** and start talking about free Tibet and Uigers, something which no government recognize except pot smoking morons believe in. Are you a hippie from India?

From a neutral perspective, India's claim on the dispute area along the India/China border is base on British dimplomat Sir Henry McMahon. Its definitely not base on any cultural claim on little statelet that exists before British occupation as these little statelets come and go. However, I do not see any one from India argue from the perspective of British occuation of India as to why the boundary of India is draw today.

The reality is that this line is draw at the time when China was undergoing revolution. British draw the line with forced invasion of Tibet in 1907. Below is the line that link to Simla accord

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simla_Accord_(1914)

"Early British efforts to create a boundary for north east India were triggered by their discovery in the mid-19th century that Tawang, an important trading town, was Tibetan territory. In 1873, the British-run Government of India drew an "Outer Line," intended as an international boundary.[6] This line follows the alignment of the Himalayan foothills, now the southern boundary of Arunachal Pradesh. Britain had concluded treaties with Qing China concerning Tibet's boundaries with Burma[7] and Sikkim.[8] However, Tibet refused to recognize the boundaries drawn by these treaties[citation needed]. British forces led by Sir Francis Younghusband invaded Tibet in 1904 and imposed a treaty on the Tibetans.[9] In 1907, Britain and Russia acknowledged Chinese "suzerainty" over Tibet and both nations "engage[d] not to enter into negotiations with Tibet except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government."[10]"

India's claim on the dispute territory is based on the relic of British aggression. China's insistence on drawing the border according to its view is because it disagree with British imposition of the border base on British emperial arm force in India. On the other side of the coin, India's claim on the disputed territory is base on British imperial agression.

If British never invaded Tibet and force the issue, there would be no border conflict between China and India today.

If YOU never invaded Tibet and force the issue, there would be no border conflict between China and India today.

 

[faithfulguy]

If YOU never invaded Tibet and force the issue, there would be no border conflict between China and India today.

Tibet was part of the China during the Ching dynasty. So China was reclaiming its territory. No different from when the north take over the southern states during civil war.

 

[faithfulguy]

Also, everyone recognize that Tibet is part of China. No one dispute that except Indian guys in here. Sometimes, your argument appear from a different dimention of reality that othes would not comprehend.

 

[gpit]

How come when a Chinese guy shows the fact that India did not exist as a state before British conquest, the India guy goes *** and start talking about free Tibet and Uigers, something which no government recognize except pot smoking morons believe in. Are you a hippie from India?

From a neutral perspective, India's claim on the dispute area along the India/China border is base on British dimplomat Sir Henry McMahon. Its definitely not base on any cultural claim on little statelet that exists before British occupation as these little statelets come and go. However, I do not see any one from India argue from the perspective of British occuation of India as to why the boundary of India is draw today.

The reality is that this line is draw at the time when China was undergoing revolution. British draw the line with forced invasion of Tibet in 1907. Below is the line that link to Simla accord

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simla_Accord_(1914)

"Early British efforts to create a boundary for north east India were triggered by their discovery in the mid-19th century that Tawang, an important trading town, was Tibetan territory. In 1873, the British-run Government of India drew an "Outer Line," intended as an international boundary.[6] This line follows the alignment of the Himalayan foothills, now the southern boundary of Arunachal Pradesh. Britain had concluded treaties with Qing China concerning Tibet's boundaries with Burma[7] and Sikkim.[8] However, Tibet refused to recognize the boundaries drawn by these treaties[citation needed]. British forces led by Sir Francis Younghusband invaded Tibet in 1904 and imposed a treaty on the Tibetans.[9] In 1907, Britain and Russia acknowledged Chinese "suzerainty" over Tibet and both nations "engage[d] not to enter into negotiations with Tibet except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government."[10]"

India's claim on the dispute territory is based on the relic of British aggression. China's insistence on drawing the border according to its view is because it disagree with British imposition of the border base on British emperial arm force in India. On the other side of the coin, India's claim on the disputed territory is base on British imperial agression.

If British never invaded Tibet and force the issue, there would be no border conflict between China and India today.

Precise analysis, mate!

I said repeatedly that India, in this aspect, behaves like a second-hand imperialism.

I remember some Indians whined that why China drew border according to McMahon with Burma but not with India. Zhou Enlai told the Indians that because China and Burma had negotiated the border issue, and settled the issue; but India said border issue is non-negotiable and the border was integral part of India, and must follow British line.

How foolish were the second-hand imperialism Indian politicians!

In retrospect, the biggest failure of India's foreigh policy in the past 62 years has been its China policy. India paid, is paying and will pay a heavy toll because of its foolish, second-hand imperialistic foreign policy.

Otherwsie, India could have been the most powerful country in whole Asia.

 

[gpit]

If YOU never invaded Tibet and force the issue, there would be no border conflict between China and India today.

If India had never existed, there would be no problem in S.Asia.