What's new

Chinese privilege claim ‘entirely baseless’, says Singaporean PM Lee Hsien Loong

Why ethic Chinese, as a marginal minority, dominate the economy of almost all ASEAN states?
Han Supremacy?

Or maybe because they are all descendants of maritime traders and their familial wealth and knowledge gave them a head start?
Most Malays in Malaysia are not even native there. Most are from Indonesia. And also Kelantan Kedah all belongs to Thailand, and going all the way back, they should be return to Thailand.


View attachment 774259
Still more native then the Chinese who are from a land thousands of kilometers away.
 
.
Actually it was Malaysia who kick out Singapore because that time, Malay would have lost the civil war. They are the minorities against CHinese Indians Kadazan Iban.

Everyone hate their racial supremacy way.

Once they get rid of Singapore, then they close the door and be king.

Today it is still the Malays who will not want a unification with Singapore. It will be demographic suicide.
Han Supremacy?

Or maybe because they are all descendants of maritime traders and their familial wealth and knowledge gave them a head start?

Still more native then the Chinese who are from a land thousands of kilometers away.
 
.
Elite AG Walter Woon say Peranakan Chinese love British and Malays. And also Peranakan feel they are Malays.

The difference between Chinese and Peranakan is Chinese love China while Peranakan love British and Malays. Unfortunately Malays stab them.

The Peranakan totally despise China, except for a minority.

**************
The Babas of the Straits Settlements (Singapore, Malacca and Penang) clearly were British subjects and generally proud of their status, as contrasted to the Chinese who owed their allegiance and kept their cultural links to China.

The fact is that the Babas were more comfortable both culturally and linguistically with Malays and Indonesians.

Many leading Babas like Lee Kuan Yew played down their Baba heritage.




 
. .
And Malays keep ranting Chinese racism despite that fact that whether or not being majority in Malaysia or minorities in Singapore, they are extremely toxic against their OWN shia.

They are also extremely toxic against their own non Islam brothers like Iban and moderately Islam brothers like Kadazan.

The Chinese treat Muslims best in this region and protect Muslims best.

If Malays have their own ways like in Malaysia, Shia could be in mortal danger, and having a high risk of being assaulted everyday.

Malays need to have their mind check in hospitals.
 
.
so western social justice finally invaded Singapore too ? :sarcastic:
 
.
so western social justice finally invaded Singapore too ? :sarcastic:

The GoS have poisoned lots of Chinese with their liberal arts schools. These graduate learn rubbish in schools and are useless to society.

They just know how to rant Chinese discriminate minorities in order to fulfill their vain sense of self righteousness.
 
Last edited:
. .
Why ethic Chinese, as a marginal minority, dominate the economy of almost all ASEAN states?
Immigrants, especially educated immigrants do much better than both their local and educated local population

happens in a lot of countries
 
.
Singapore is not the only spot along the Malacca Strait

It's the same lazy argument. Our economy today has evolved far beyond being just a transshipment port. Manufacturing, finance, business hub etc. In fact manufacturing is our largest industry. By their logic, Panama and Egypt should be more prosperous than us since they can at least collect toll fees while Malacca Strait is free to pass by lmao.

1630340710991.png


1630340919498.png


1630340729551.png

 
.
Immigrants, especially educated immigrants do much better than both their local and educated local population

happens in a lot of countries
Very few countries have their economy totally controlled by immigrants, is your economy being dominated by immigrants?
 
.
Very few countries have their economy totally controlled by immigrants, is your economy being dominated by immigrants?
I don't know about "totally" part but yeah educated immigrants play an oversized role in a country's economy

Asian Americans (not just east Asia) earn more than average Americans, in Pak the Indian Muslim migrants (who were more educated than the locals at the time- because they were rich, they were pushed out of their homes) basically started the country's bureaucracy, economy

same with India its Pakistani origin Hindus play an oversized role in their economy, Persian Zoroastrian immigrants

its normal
 
.
Immigrants, especially educated immigrants do much better than both their local and educated local population

happens in a lot of countries

True for today maybe, but the first gen of migrants moving to Singapore in the last century were mostly illiterate farmers escaping famine and civil wars from Southern China.

1630341591108.png


 
.
I don't know about "totally" part but yeah educated immigrants play an oversized role in a country's economy

Asian Americans (not just east Asia) earn more than average Americans, in Pak the Indian Muslim migrants (who were more educated than the locals at the time- because they were rich, they were pushed out of their homes) basically started the country's bureaucracy, economy

same with India its Pakistani origin Hindus play an oversized role in their economy, Persian Zoroastrian immigrants

its normal
So if Singapore were dominated by Malays or Indians, the state can still be this rich and developed, its development level has nothing to do with the people living in it?
 
.
But Lee Hsien Loong speaks Mandarin Chinese same as someone from China.Native level Mandarin.

LHL has good vocabulary in Mandarin but his pronunciations are not perfect. He himself said that before because there's no Hanyu Pinyin at that time, and maybe also because many teachers teach Mandarin with dialect accents.

 
.
Back
Top Bottom