Yerusalem 4880 Kms
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2017
- Messages
- 844
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
indo Chinese relationship
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
indo Chinese relationship
so we can safely conclude this :After pappu meeting with Chinese diplomat inpe bhi asar aane laga hai pappu ka.
Eleven and his troll gang has gone bonkers
No amount of denial is going to reduce your humiliation, Chang.Forced China to agree to what? China will continue building the road bhai. Now Chinese troops are permanently stationed there instead of just patrolling. You just militarized the whole Doklam area.
He has now become a useful strategic asset for us.so we can safe conclude this :
1. RaGa went to talk with Akhilesh : Akhilesh Lost
2. RaGa went to talk with Nitish : Nitish kumar left and joined BJP
3. RaGa went to talk with China : China left Dokhlam
RaGa is our Brahmos 2.0
as per inside leaks, Xi and Modi both agreed to tone down when they met on the sideline of G20. Thus the NSA level talks happened, followed by border standoff release. Its nice to see two future powers acting maturely, both knowing the consequence of fighting a long war in their own backyardIt is time we forget doklam.... Move on to brics and work towards gaining the lost ground in indo Chinese relationship....
Erm how does telling the world officially they are continuing to build the road means getting out of road building?. Nobody is denying anything, we just need to go by official statements, you read MEA statements and you read MOFA statements. Then you get the real picture.No amount of denial is going to reduce your humiliation, Chang.
Your ministry is now desperately using words like factors, ground situation, circumstances to get out of road building.
Sure India won!
http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/t1488261.shtml
Q: Could you tell us that how many Chinese soldiers are still deployed at the Dong Lang area?
A: This is a very specific question. What I can tell you is that The Chinese border troops continue with their patrols and stationing in the Dong Lang area. China will adjust and deploy its military resources in accordance with the need of guarding the border and the situation on the ground.
FMPRC never said they will continue building the road, infact they said it depends on factors/situation/circumstances etcErm how does telling the world officially they are continuing to build the road means getting out of road building?. Nobody is denying anything, we just need to go by official statements, you read MEA statements and you read MOFA statements. Then you get the real picture.
FMPRC never said they will continue building the road, infact they said it depends on factors/situation/circumstances etc
Lessons learned in tense China-India border row but it will cast a long shadow, analysts say
With the BRICS summit next week and growing economic cooperation at stake, both sides had good reason to end the stand-off
Shi Jiangtao / Kristin Huang
UPDATED : Wednesday, 30 Aug 2017, 1:33PM
“China understands the importance of creating a favourable atmosphere for the success of the summit and the all-important party congress,” said Wang Dehua, head of South Asia studies at the Shanghai Institute for International Studies.
China has pulled out all the stops with meticulous preparations for the summit and Beijing did not want it overshadowed by the border row, according to Chinese experts.
“The event – where Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi are supposed to meet – has offered a way out of this unexpectedly tense stand-off, although there are different interpretations as to which side actually compromised more,” said Yue Gang, a retired colonel in the PLA’s General Staff Department.
Harsh Pant, a professor of international relations at King’s College London, also said the pull-out of Indian troops was “absolutely” in response to the upcoming BRICS summit.
“China needed this to be resolved [ahead of BRICS],” he said by phone from New Delhi. “If any country was under pressure, it was China, not India. There was no reason for India to do anything else apart from holding on and digging in at the border, as India was doing.”
But Wang noted that embattled Indian leader Modi was also keen to make the summit a success because it was a key international platform for India’s growing economic cooperation with China.
Although the Chinese foreign ministry sounded triumphant announcing that the Indian troops had withdrawn, experts say it was Beijing who had compromised by seemingly accepting New Delhi’s demand that it stop road construction in the disputed area where China, India and Bhutan meet.
“Despite Beijing’s deliberate ambiguity, China has apparently made substantial concessions in order to end the dispute,” Yue said.
Since the stand-off began in mid-June, India had urged China to put a stop to road building near its Bhutan border. Beijing had meanwhile insisted that India must withdraw its troops from the area before negotiations to peacefully resolve the crisis could begin.
China said on Tuesday that the weather was a factor affecting its construction of roads and other infrastructure along the Himalayan border with India, and it would maintain patrols in the contested area. But most analysts say China appears to have quietly halted the project after weeks of intense diplomatic negotiations.
"India has got exactly what it has wanted. It was a humiliating defeat for China to cave in to pressure from India despite all the tough talk,” Yue said.
Pant also said the Indian side may have agreed to withdraw because it got what it wanted on the Doklam plateau – restoration of the status quo before China began construction along the unmarked border.
http://m.scmp.com/news/china/diplom...-learned-tense-china-india-border-row-it-will
PLA Colonel? No PLA Colonel will make statements, most likely alleged personal opinion of retired guy?The fact that you had to change the title of the article shows exactly Indian knew they had backed down.
China demanded Indian withdraw.
India insisted on both side to withdraw and halting construction.
Outcome: India withdrew. China did not.
No official word on halting construction.
Nope.The fact that you had to change the title of the article shows exactly Indian knew they had backed down.
China demanded Indian withdraw.
India insisted on both side to withdraw and halting construction.
Outcome: India withdrew. China did not.
No official word on halting construction.
Nope.
I just posted what the PLA Colonel said.
Outcome: China stopped road construction which sparked the standoff.