What's new

Chinese Missiles News & Discussions

微信图片_20191231034702.jpg

Via @中国火箭军 from Weixin
 
. . . . . . . . . .
China's test of sub-launched missile a threat to peace, retired captain warns
Underwater JL-3 launch comes amid fears of North Korean missile test

By Bill Gertz - The Washington Times - Tuesday, December 24, 2019

China’s military this week conducted a flight test of a new submarine-launched missile capable of hitting the entire United States with a nuclear warhead, according to Pentagon officials.


....

China tests submarine-launched JL-3 missile capable of hitting U.S with nuke - Washington Times
The JL-3 and JL-2's range figures seem way off in this article (5600 miles for the JL-3 and 4350 miles for the JL-2).
 
. .
The JL-3 and JL-2's range figures seem way off in this article (5600 miles for the JL-3 and 4350 miles for the JL-2).
That article didn't want to spoil the confidence of the widely believed notion that China has no credible submarine + SLBM solution to threaten the CONUS. Thus some discounts on JL-3 and JL-2 ranges. About the Nuclear Triad, according to the many US think tanks, China so far essentially only possesses the credible ground deterrent with the deployment of the mobile DF-41 as far as concerning the CONUS.
 
Last edited:
.
That article didn't want to spoil the confidence of the widely believed notion that China has no credible submarine + SLBM solution to threaten the CONUS. Thus some discounts on JL-3 and JL-2 ranges. About the Nuclear Triad, according to the many US think tanks, China so far essentially only possesses the credible ground deterrent with the deployment of the mobile DF-41 as far as concerning the CONUS.
I think the US has believed China has a credible underwater deterrent since the JL-2A. The author here probably misstated the range figures, especially considering when the JL-3 is basically a navalized version of the DF-41.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom