Spring Onion
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2006
- Messages
- 41,403
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
and how will they survive? on UN advice to eat insects for survival?
Chinese might face internal problems and disintegrate
- Thread starter atatwolf
- Start date
and how will they survive? on UN advice to eat insects for survival?
Hellraiser007
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2012
- Messages
- 1,971
- Reaction score
- -3
Xingjiang and Tibet movements are there and there is a chance for separation.
cirr
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2012
- Messages
- 17,049
- Reaction score
- 18
- Country
- Location
There are hundreds of armed movements/organizations，with the major ones having members in the tens of thousands， fighting for national independence outside india.
As a matter of fact，the whole of India is riddled with regions which seeks separation from India。
Hellraiser007
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2012
- Messages
- 1,971
- Reaction score
- -3
And yet they vote for Indian Parliament and they are showing their faith in this country and New Delhi for almost 70 years.
Same cannot be said in case of China.
Any one can become a rebel if you arm them and show some weakness of Govt., It is the majority opinion that counts.
Don't comment on history if you don't know it. USSR looked strong? post 1980 it was all downhill for the USSR. A collapse a decade in the making.
atatwolf
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2012
- Messages
- 6,965
- Reaction score
- -19
- Country
- Location
And yet they vote for Indian Parliament and they are showing their faith in this country and New Delhi for almost 70 years.
Same cannot be said in case of China.
Any one can become a rebel if you arm them and show some weakness of Govt., It is the majority opinion that counts.
True, Uighur and Tibetans feel very discriminated under China rule. The government let's the ethnic Chinese eat the cherry from the cake and let minorities suffer. And if they protest, horrible things happen to them.
Jackdaws
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2010
- Messages
- 13,114
- Reaction score
- -49
- Country
- Location
Yes - but it is obvious that the average Chinese citizen not only lacks a conscience but also a backbone. They have never stood up to tyranny and have always accepted what has been dictated to them - by Emperors, by Japanese, by the Brits, by the Communist Party and by American corporations. Such a country can't disintegrate because the people themselves are fine living without basic human rights.
Sasquatch
RETIRED INTL MOD
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2011
- Messages
- 4,344
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
2010 article not to mention several things in this have changed, Well aware the current economic model is not sustainable already been acknowledged China is moving away from an export based economy to a consumption based one. Next retirement age which is low at 60 and 55 can be changed not to mention getting rid of the one child policy, plenty of time to get rid of the labor shortage if needed. Average Chinese might be poor compared to western countries but the average income has increase since 2010 and will continue, As far as Xinjiang and Tibet there both stable then some western sources make it out self immolation or terror attacks won't change that seperation is also very low.
Snomannen
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2012
- Messages
- 1,998
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Interesting, because Minorities in China such as "feel-very-discriminated Uighur and Tibetans" are no need to follow the 1 Child Policy like most of the ethnics like Han people do, they even don't need to pay for the educational fees. The funnies thing is when Uighur and Tibetans commit a crime, they usually being released in a few time by the government, since arresting them may give advantage to western media to annoy the Chinese government. Such actions even make many Han people feel not satisfied, Han people are those who "very discriminated" under China rule.
Not to mention the highest leader and most of officers in Tibet and Xinjing are local Uighur and Tibetans. Even in the National People's Congress there are many minorities.
Sonyuke_Songpaisan
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2011
- Messages
- 1,751
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Tibet can be independant on south tibet which os occupied by indians now
conworldus
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2009
- Messages
- 1,971
- Reaction score
- 0
Being this ignorant says a lot about Indians' stunning lack of knowledge of the world. It is not even worth debating when it is pure BS.
Jackdaws
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2010
- Messages
- 13,114
- Reaction score
- -49
- Country
- Location
Interesting way to chicken out of a debate.
faithfulguy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 13,651
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
this thread need to go the way of the dumpsters. Why dig up a 3 year article? Might as well come up with a new thread making Gordon Chang's 2001 prediction about the collapse of China in 10 years.
All these articles about the coming collapse of China or America and all these facebook pages about making an Indian superpower by 20## says a lot about the present day reality.
All these articles about the coming collapse of China or America and all these facebook pages about making an Indian superpower by 20## says a lot about the present day reality.
atatwolf
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2012
- Messages
- 6,965
- Reaction score
- -19
- Country
- Location
The disintegration of the giant Soviet Union took everyone by surprise. The reasons for the disintegration remain a mystery for most analysts.
Perhaps we Chinese, with a history of quite a few disintegrations, may understand it better.
Like China with a long history of feudal autocracy, in the Soviet Union, there was not only a central autocracy but also various levels of local autocracies.
When the central autocrat is weak, he may be replaced by a local autocrat stronger than all other local autocrats, or the autocratic state is divided by various local autocrats into a number of autocracies.
What happened in the Soviet Union was precisely that.
Before Gorbachev came to power, the Soviet Union consisted of one central autocracy and 16 local autocracies referred to as member republics. When Gorbachev conducted a democratic reform, he was unable to control local autocrats.
As a result, the Soviet Union disintegrated into almost the same number of autocracies as that of its member republics. Some of them have really turned into democracies, but others are only democracies in name but autocracies in essence.
Deng Xiaoping established Chinas core system, a centralised collect leadership with a core who has the final say. In my book Tianamens Tremendous Achievements, I call it the CCP Dynasty, the Partys empire with its core functioning as its emperor.
At that time, as conservatives were the powerful majority in the Party, only a reformist core as powerful as Deng would be able to carry on Dengs reform. That was Dengs plan. It worked. Dengs successor Jiang Zeming has successfully established his position as the core and carried on the reform until now.
However, as pointed out in the above-mentioned book:
Succession to the Core Is the Trickiest Problem
One thing quite interesting in Chinese politics is that there are no definition, codes or rules whatever about the power of an emperor in the past and the core of the Party now. In fact, even if there are some codes or rules, there is no institution or mechanism to enforce them.
For the Party, the best way to have a successor to the core is to appoint the successor to the posts of general secretary and, concurrently, the CMC (Central Military Commission) chairman, but as mentioned in Chapter 1, that general secretary and CMC chairman may only be a daughter-in-law.
He has to obey the instructions of the core (like Deng), the mother-in-law, or to a number of powerful elders, that is, several mothers-in-law if there is no core.
From this, we can see how serious Chinas problems are. Even in a developing country such as India, Indonesia or the Philippines, when a person is elected the prime minister or president, he naturally has the power of his office as soon as he has been elected in the parliament or inaugurated.
In China, however, a Party leader elected by the Party central committee may be powerless and the country may remain dominated by the elders who hold no official posts at all. In order to really have power and be firmly established, the leader has to gradually establish his power base and become the core.
Even if he is lucky enough to really succeed in establishing his power base, it will take at least several years. Anyway, it is a very difficult process because he should be skilled in applying the art for being an emperor.
In current China, the core is very old and lacks the vigour to rule while the General Secretary, though to some extent has established his power base, is not powerful enough. As a result, local officials grow stronger. Bo Xilai set his Chongqing model while Wang Yang set his Guangdong model. Both seemed to show that they were more clever than central leaders.
Obviously, local leaders were strong enough to become independent and China might disintegrate. The removal of Bo Xilai from all his posts was a power struggle aimed to ensure not only the rule of law but also to strengthen the central authoritys control of the nation.
This was proved by Renmin Ribaos three commentaries on Bo Xilais downfall. The first one points out the importance to the rule of law but ends by stressing that the whole party should keep consistent with the Partys central authority in thoughts and closely unite around it, stressing obedience to the central authority.
The second is entirely devoted to stressing such obedience while the third, to stressing discipline and the rule of law.
Obviously strengthening central authority was the first priority then.
Bo Xilais arrogance before falling into disgrace proved that in fact, Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao were weak then. It was only through the support of powerful elders could they succeed in dealing with Bo Xilai.
However, I pointed in my post Sichuan, the Best Place for a Separate Regime on April 17:
Sichuan, including Chongqing that was formerly a major part of Sichuan, is the best place for the establishment of a separate regime due to difficult access to it from other Chinese areas. Chinas famous poet Li Bai wrote a well-known poem entitled Going to Sichuan Is More Difficult than Climbing up to the Heaven.
Sichuan was a separate independent state five times when China was disintegrated. The longest of them lasted from 221 to 263 AD.
if the central authority is not strong enough, with the support of a part of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), especially the 14th Group Army and the Chengdu Garrison, it is quite easy for Bo Xilai to establish a separate independent regime in Sichuan. If he has enough support, he may include Yunnan, Tibet and other areas in his state.
If some other provinces also declare independence and if the PLA generals refuse to fight a civil war, China may disintegrate.
The Wang Lijun incident occurred on February 6, but the CCP Central did not make things difficult for Bo and waited till the time when Bo Xilai came to Beijing to attend NPC meetings. It has thus successfully placed Bo under house arrest when he was away from his base municipality and avoided the serious trouble of Bo declaring independence in Chongqing and bringing China into chaos.
China avoided disintegration that time. However due to the difficulty of succession to the core of CCP Empire, if no strongman succeeds Jiang Zemin when Jiang has passed away, so that there will be a weak central autocracy, it is very likely that China will disintegrate into a number of local autocracies just like the Soviet Union.
China at crossroad: risk of disintegration | China Daily Mail
Perhaps we Chinese, with a history of quite a few disintegrations, may understand it better.
Like China with a long history of feudal autocracy, in the Soviet Union, there was not only a central autocracy but also various levels of local autocracies.
When the central autocrat is weak, he may be replaced by a local autocrat stronger than all other local autocrats, or the autocratic state is divided by various local autocrats into a number of autocracies.
What happened in the Soviet Union was precisely that.
Before Gorbachev came to power, the Soviet Union consisted of one central autocracy and 16 local autocracies referred to as member republics. When Gorbachev conducted a democratic reform, he was unable to control local autocrats.
As a result, the Soviet Union disintegrated into almost the same number of autocracies as that of its member republics. Some of them have really turned into democracies, but others are only democracies in name but autocracies in essence.
Deng Xiaoping established Chinas core system, a centralised collect leadership with a core who has the final say. In my book Tianamens Tremendous Achievements, I call it the CCP Dynasty, the Partys empire with its core functioning as its emperor.
At that time, as conservatives were the powerful majority in the Party, only a reformist core as powerful as Deng would be able to carry on Dengs reform. That was Dengs plan. It worked. Dengs successor Jiang Zeming has successfully established his position as the core and carried on the reform until now.
However, as pointed out in the above-mentioned book:
Succession to the Core Is the Trickiest Problem
One thing quite interesting in Chinese politics is that there are no definition, codes or rules whatever about the power of an emperor in the past and the core of the Party now. In fact, even if there are some codes or rules, there is no institution or mechanism to enforce them.
For the Party, the best way to have a successor to the core is to appoint the successor to the posts of general secretary and, concurrently, the CMC (Central Military Commission) chairman, but as mentioned in Chapter 1, that general secretary and CMC chairman may only be a daughter-in-law.
He has to obey the instructions of the core (like Deng), the mother-in-law, or to a number of powerful elders, that is, several mothers-in-law if there is no core.
From this, we can see how serious Chinas problems are. Even in a developing country such as India, Indonesia or the Philippines, when a person is elected the prime minister or president, he naturally has the power of his office as soon as he has been elected in the parliament or inaugurated.
In China, however, a Party leader elected by the Party central committee may be powerless and the country may remain dominated by the elders who hold no official posts at all. In order to really have power and be firmly established, the leader has to gradually establish his power base and become the core.
Even if he is lucky enough to really succeed in establishing his power base, it will take at least several years. Anyway, it is a very difficult process because he should be skilled in applying the art for being an emperor.
In current China, the core is very old and lacks the vigour to rule while the General Secretary, though to some extent has established his power base, is not powerful enough. As a result, local officials grow stronger. Bo Xilai set his Chongqing model while Wang Yang set his Guangdong model. Both seemed to show that they were more clever than central leaders.
Obviously, local leaders were strong enough to become independent and China might disintegrate. The removal of Bo Xilai from all his posts was a power struggle aimed to ensure not only the rule of law but also to strengthen the central authoritys control of the nation.
This was proved by Renmin Ribaos three commentaries on Bo Xilais downfall. The first one points out the importance to the rule of law but ends by stressing that the whole party should keep consistent with the Partys central authority in thoughts and closely unite around it, stressing obedience to the central authority.
The second is entirely devoted to stressing such obedience while the third, to stressing discipline and the rule of law.
Obviously strengthening central authority was the first priority then.
Bo Xilais arrogance before falling into disgrace proved that in fact, Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao were weak then. It was only through the support of powerful elders could they succeed in dealing with Bo Xilai.
However, I pointed in my post Sichuan, the Best Place for a Separate Regime on April 17:
Sichuan, including Chongqing that was formerly a major part of Sichuan, is the best place for the establishment of a separate regime due to difficult access to it from other Chinese areas. Chinas famous poet Li Bai wrote a well-known poem entitled Going to Sichuan Is More Difficult than Climbing up to the Heaven.
Sichuan was a separate independent state five times when China was disintegrated. The longest of them lasted from 221 to 263 AD.
if the central authority is not strong enough, with the support of a part of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), especially the 14th Group Army and the Chengdu Garrison, it is quite easy for Bo Xilai to establish a separate independent regime in Sichuan. If he has enough support, he may include Yunnan, Tibet and other areas in his state.
If some other provinces also declare independence and if the PLA generals refuse to fight a civil war, China may disintegrate.
The Wang Lijun incident occurred on February 6, but the CCP Central did not make things difficult for Bo and waited till the time when Bo Xilai came to Beijing to attend NPC meetings. It has thus successfully placed Bo under house arrest when he was away from his base municipality and avoided the serious trouble of Bo declaring independence in Chongqing and bringing China into chaos.
China avoided disintegration that time. However due to the difficulty of succession to the core of CCP Empire, if no strongman succeeds Jiang Zemin when Jiang has passed away, so that there will be a weak central autocracy, it is very likely that China will disintegrate into a number of local autocracies just like the Soviet Union.
China at crossroad: risk of disintegration | China Daily Mail
Similar threads
