What's new

Chinese Harrass U.S. Aircraft In International Airspace

We did. We stop supplying fuel and make it very tough for North Korea to live a luxurious lifestyle like they did before..

Nk has a luxurious lifestyle??? The country was piss poor .....and still is. But they are running the same way they did 5 years ago. Are you guys supplying fuel through Iran then?

I don't see how NK had any issues if you really imposed "sanctions" on them. You guys want to copy the US.....try imposing sanctions correctly as starters. By the way, your "barrel roll" have so much impact on us that we don't even send Escort fighters with our unarmed planes :usflag:
 
Last edited:
.
I already said we will not be ready until 2025, do you have a hearing (reading) problem? :P

That's because we are on an upwards trajectory, our relative power is increasing by bounds and bounds every single year. So time is on our side, we can wait till our current phase of economic expansion is complete. In fact that would be to our advantage.

America on the other hand has already peaked, in the future their relative power is only going to keep shrinking and shrinking. If they couldn't do anything about Scarborough in 2012 or Ukraine in 2014, there is pretty much a zero chance they will do anything about it after waiting a decade and shrinking further in relative power.

I'm glad you finally admitted that China is too weak and not able to take on Japan after all those claims about being more powerful and nuking Japan with ease. Bravo!:yahoo:
 
.
I'm glad you finally admitted that China is too weak and not able to take on Japan after all those claims about being more powerful and nuking Japan with ease. Bravo!:yahoo:

You seem to have a problem with reading comprehension. :P I said we will prefer to finish our current stage of economic expansion, since time is on our side, and we are the ones increasing in relative power as time goes on. While America shrinks in relative power as time goes on. So it is to our advantage to wait, but it is NOT in America's advantage to wait.

And for the 10th time, when are you going to uphold your mutual defence treaty with the Philippines, after we seized Scarborough shoal in 2012? :wave:
 
.
You seem to have a problem with reading comprehension. :P I said we will prefer to finish our current stage of economic expansion, since time is on our side, and we are the ones increasing in relative power as time goes on. While America shrinks in relative power as time goes on. So it is to our advantage to wait, but it is NOT in America's advantage to wait.

And for the 10th time, when are you going to uphold your mutual defence treaty with the Philippines, after we seized Scarborough shoal in 2012? :wave:

Don't have a problem with reading comprehension. Just waiting for admission that China is weak right now instead of claiming you are more powerful than Japan right now as you guys claimed. And since I've posted my first response on why we didn't intervene is because we see the advantage of China's aggression against the Phillippines that would benefit the U.S. to have our forces back in.

Maybe you have a problem with reading comprehension after all.
Look at my post #22

US X-47B versus PLA 'Sword' | Page 2
 
.
Don't have a problem with reading comprehension. Just waiting for admission that China is weak right now instead of claiming you are more powerful than Japan right now as you guys claimed. And since I've posted my first response on why we didn't intervene is because we see the advantage of China's aggression against the Phillippines that would benefit the U.S. to have our forces back in.

Maybe you have a problem with reading comprehension after all.
Look at my post #22

US X-47B versus PLA 'Sword' | Page 2

You failed in reading comprehension again. :no:

I already admitted we are not ready right now, and we will be ready in 2025 for the next step (Taiwan).

Which makes it even more embarassing for you, since how could an "unready and unprepared" China in 2012 force America to abandon their mutual defence treaty, when we seized Scarborough?

And if you couldn't do anything about it then, how on Earth are you going to do anything about it in 2025 when we are ACTUALLY ready, and have properly consolidated our power, while America's relative power only shrinks as time goes on?

Keep waiting. It helps us in the end. :partay:
 
.
Geng emphasized that the mission “is in line with the international law and domestic law of the U.S.” The latter may hold the key to understanding China’s position, as Andrew S. Erickson and Emily de La Bruyere suggest in their analysis of China’s RIMPAC surveillance."
 
.
You failed in reading comprehension again. :no:

I already admitted we are not ready right now, and we will be ready in 2025 for the next step (Taiwan).

Which makes it even more embarassing for you, since how could an "unready and unprepared" China in 2012 force America to abandon their mutual defence treaty, when we seized Scarborough?

And if you couldn't do anything about it then, how on Earth are you going to do anything about it in 2025 when we are ACTUALLY ready, and have properly consolidated our power, while America's relative power only shrinks as time goes on?

Keep waiting. It helps us in the end. :partay:

:yahoo:You failed reading comprehension again, or you never read my post #22 as to why we didn't intervene. You guys already talked about being more powerful than Japan as of right now and your admission tells us that China is indeed too weak to take on Japan. So like I said all bark and no bite. You can claim all you want about wait and see, but its just cover up that you are too weak. Thats the embarrassing part for you.
 
.
:yahoo:You failed reading comprehension again, or you never read my post #22 as to why we didn't intervene. You guys already talked about being more powerful than Japan as of right now and your admission tells us that China is indeed too weak to take on Japan. So like I said all bark and no bite. You can claim all you want about wait and see, but its just cover up that you are too weak. Thats the embarrassing part for you.

I think you are actually unable to read and answer simple questions. :P

This is a waste of time. Unless you are willing to explain how us seizing Scarborough in 2012, and forcing America to abandon their mutual defence treaty, was due to us being "unready", "weak", or an example of "all bark and no bite".

I've already admitted we are not ready, so how did that happen? o_O And since America's relative power keeps shrinking as time goes on, how can you do it later when you could not even do it now?

These are genuine questions. The same question that everyone else in the world is asking, except they are now asking it about Crimea. They forgot about Scarborough, so did you.
 
.

Whats China's domestic laws about foreign ships in its EEZ?
 
.
China just graduated in geo-politics. My respects to the Chinese nation for having the balls to do the unthinkable.
Right! And the Americans lacked the balls to shoot it down!!

It was clearly an act of intimidation if not war as it was within the ACs 'airspace'.
 
.
I think you are actually unable to read and answer simple questions. :P

This is a waste of time. Unless you are willing to explain how us seizing Scarborough in 2012, and forcing America to abandon their mutual defence treaty, was due to us being "unready", "weak", or an example of "all bark and no bite".

I've already admitted we are not ready, so how did that happen?

You can't even comprehend my explanation why the U.S. didn't intervene when the Philippines kicked us out and comprehend the strategy that by allowing China to show its aggression, that it would have the Philippines allowing American forces back onto its soil even when it is unpopular to some Filipinos. Think about it. What does it benefit to the U.S.? Or can't you not comprehend enough?
U.S., Philippines accord to allow greater American military presence - LA Times

16x9


The U.S. and Philippine governments have worked out a new defense cooperation agreement that opens the way for the first large-scale return of American military forces to the island nation since their eviction in the early 1990s, according to the White House.

A day before President Obama is scheduled to arrive in Manila, advisors to the president said Sunday that the two sides had completed and will sign a framework accord that will allow U.S. troops, warships and aircraft to operate from Philippine military bases and training camps on a rotating basis.

Demonstrations erupted outside the U.S. Embassy in Manila last week to protest the new security agreement with the Philippines’ former colonial ruler. Leftist groups long have accused Washington of interfering in local affairs, and blamed the U.S. for many of their nation’s post-colonial woes, including widespread poverty and decades of political repression.

The accord, which was negotiated over eight months, does not authorize building permanent U.S. bases or stationing large numbers of troops in the Philippines, which would be prohibited under the country’s constitution without a formal treaty.

In some cases, however, portions of the Philippine installations will be refurbished and used to pre-position U.S. supplies and equipment in the event of regional crises or humanitarian disasters.

U.S. Ambassador Phil Goldberg will sign the accord with the Philippine’s defense minister, Voltaire Gazmin, early Monday before Obama arrives in Manila, U.S. officials said.

The security arrangement is still a work in progress, however. Officials said its timing, scope and duration were still subject to negotiation.

lRelated
World Now
Obama becomes first U.S. president to visit Malaysia since Johnson

See all related
8

Officials say the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement can take effect without specific approval by the Philippine Senate, which in 1991 rejected an extension of a long-standing base agreement and forced Washington to close Clark Air Base and Subic Bay Naval Base, two of the Pentagon's largest overseas facilities.

More than two decades after that ouster, the new agreement marks an improvement in U.S. relations with Manila, as well as recognition of the growing regional tensions with China over resource-rich islands and shoals in the South China Sea.

Right! And the Americans lacked the balls to shoot it down!!

It was clearly an act of intimidation if not war as it was within the ACs 'airspace'.

A Poseidon doesn't have air to air missiles.:what:
 
.
can't figure out why chinese media didn't report it formerly saying us spy plane entered chinese adiz and intercepted
in today's media world, suppressing news can't work and often backfires. usa is smart to have a solid mass media network
who said China didn't report it? your imagination? it is right on the top of media.

Right! And the Americans lacked the balls to shoot it down!!

It was clearly an act of intimidation if not war as it was within the ACs 'airspace'.
US is not sutpid, its AC is within our DF-21's airspace.
 
. .
who said China didn't report it? your imagination? it is right on the top of media.

where did they report? domestic media is for national consumption, you can't expect a brazilian to read a piece of news in chinese. i saw this first on wfb yesterday, i didn't see it on any english language chinese news.
 
.
Whats China's domestic laws about foreign ships in its EEZ?
China has the sovereign right to determine/decide whether foreign military ships/planes in its EEZ is carrying out hostile/harmful act or not.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom