What's new

Chinese Flanker Family: J-11, J-16 ... Su-27SK/UBK, Su-30MKK

Nope, we still need 5th gen, the J-11B still has an RCS of ~3m^2, ~80% decrease from an original Su-27 body kit, while a 5th gen aircraft should have an average RCS of ~33.3% of that of the J-11B. Hence, in the end, we still need it!

F-22 is a stealth plane and its rumored RCS is 0.10 to 0.01 far far below Flanker's. No wonder it took almost 2 decades for even US to develop such a fighter
 
.
welll hate to break it to ya chinese do copy ritee? chinese did get su 30 riteeee? they reversed it ....thus makeing j 11b

Bhai sahib get yourself corrected.....They developed on Su-27UBK (manufactured in China as J-11) with indigenous systems. Not SU-30MKK. The airframe was similar to that of SU-27 but 70% of the components used are of Chinese origin. A further development on J-11B is newly developed J-11BS that is thought to be in the same class of SU-30
 
.
It's some what ironic,

The SU-30 MKI was seen by the Indians as an indispensable marvel but as soon as one crashed they suddenly changed their tone to,

"No big deal, even the F-22 has also crashed".

There must be a moral there somewhere.

it doesn't matter that they crash..The planes all over the world crash....There is something wrong, when they are Busted by other plane.....Like F-22 got busted by a Viper and a EF was able to lock onto F-22 from a good distance.....I don't know about the red flag details that how many time MKI was busted by USAF
 
. .
good news, but bro i can't see your 1st four pictures!
 
. . .
I'm waiting for someone from India to claim that this is copied or photoshopped.
 
. . . .
More original pictures:


6464cef52723ec41b9f96370bf4c005a.jpg

84eaea5b80a5c7ecbcd4c584d5258e05.jpg

:china::smitten:
 

Attachments

  • 6464cef52723ec41b9f96370bf4c005a.jpg
    6464cef52723ec41b9f96370bf4c005a.jpg
    922 KB · Views: 61
. .
I hope all the problems with WS-10A has been solved by now. The 2008 fiasco should never repeat again.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom