What's new

Chinese find India a potential partner unlike Japan-Leo Wang

J-30

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
May 5, 2013
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
The past 12 months have seen China getting directly involved in potentially explosive situations such as Ladakh or the Diaoyu Islands. It almost seems as if, as China rises, it is starting to flex its muscles and shift away from the more non-confrontational approach it has used in the past decade towards more direct military confrontation. However, appearances can be deceiving. These two situations, seen from the point of view of Chinese citizens, are extremely different from each other.

The recent conflict surrounding the Diaoyu Islands is born from the trauma China endured under Japanese occupation during the World War II. To this day, the relationship with Japan remains extremely tense, particularly due to what is perceived as continuing provocation, such as Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe's yearly visit to the Yasukuni shrine where Class A, B and C war criminals are enshrined. As a consequence, any geopolitical conflict with Japan usually arouses very strong reactions from the population, often demanding immediate retribution and forcing the government into taking a hard stance.

PARTNERS NOT FOES

The Ladakh conflict, however, is seen as very different. Very few Chinese citizens feel there are tensions between India and China, to the extent that awareness of this incident is extremely low. Furthermore, the strategic importance of the Ladakh region or other border areas such as NEFA seems far lower than the Diaoyu Islands. They do not fit into China's plan for Tibet, and the massive, forbidding heights of the Himalayas make the regions difficult to access and develop.

Rather, most Chinese citizens view India as a strong partner in the region. Over the past two decades both countries have followed very different development models: India has focused on building up a strong tertiary sector while China has relied on export - driven growth. This has led to a situation in which both countries' economies have been strongly complementary, and cooperation has been the natural course to follow.

These two giant countries are therefore seeing their economic reliance on the other increase year by year. Trade between China and India has grown tremendously over the past few years, and currently stands at between $50 billion and $80 billion.

However, the commonly shared impression is that cooperation is only beginning. Indian businesses are being greeted with open arms while an increasing number of Chinese brands are looking towards India as the next great market to enter. Service companies in China and India are teaming up and offering combined services to global players worldwide. For businesses throughout China, India is a potential long-term partner with which it is increasingly important to build strong relationships. For them, the importance of the Ladakh region is almost insignificant when considering the greater scheme of things.

POWERHOUSES, BOTH

Furthermore, from a Chinese standpoint, greater cooperation with India is needed. These two economic powerhouses are fast becoming political forces that are shaping Asia around them. Collaboration and agreeing on aligned approaches to geopolitical problems will be key to establishing a stable and prosperous Asia. Incidents are bound to happen occasionally. However, they will be resolved diplomatically and with no risk of escalation.

In the coming meeting between Chinese and Indian leaders, one can expect this situation to be resolved quickly and efficiently, so that the conversation can move on to more important issues. The real question that will be addressed is both simple and extremely complex: Which measures need to be taken within each country to strengthen economic cooperation between them? The day when Indian brands are household names in China, and Chinese brands are serious competitors in India, and when both countries help drive each other's growth and innovation is not far away.

(The writer is an analyst with China Market Research Group, a Shanghai-based strategic market intelligence firm.)

Chinese find India a potential partner unlike Japan - Page2 - The Economic Times
 
we both have a long history of trading and we both have lived long together peacefully.....Its really a very good news that both countries shown maturity while dealing with DBO incursion.....hope we will come out as a great partners in future.
 
while it matters to some extent while chinese people think about india or japan but what matters most is what neighbours of china think about it..

China by sending it's troops rather than raising a strong objection diplomatically chose to go with a potentially escalatory method to deal with it which bodes ill for any chinese diplomacy in the region be it with viets or indonesia or japan or any other country..

Everyone will be more cohesive in their approach to china henceforth. rather would jointly try to deal with it !
 
while it matters to some extent while chinese people think about india or japan but what matters most is what neighbours of china think about it..

China by sending it's troops rather than raising a strong objection diplomatically chose to go with a potentially escalatory method to deal with it which bodes ill for any chinese diplomacy in the region be it with viets or indonesia or japan or any other country..

Everyone will be more cohesive in their approach to china henceforth. rather would jointly try to deal with it !

We both withdrew from DBO (which India claims is 20 km inside her territory).

No bloodshed, no killings of soldiers, no beheadings and no mutilations.

If that is not peaceful then I don't know how you would characterize your other borders. :no:
 
we both have a long history of trading and we both have lived long together peacefully.....Its really a very good news that both countries shown maturity while dealing with DBO incursion.....hope we will come out as a great partners in future.

This is true the incident aint as bad as india media make it out to be
 
We both withdrew from DBO (which India claims is 20 km inside her territory).

No bloodshed, no killings of soldiers, no beheadings and no mutilations.

If that is not peaceful then I don't know how you would characterize your other borders. :no:

that is without doubt peaceful but the intent is what matters in this case. anyways, rather than me arguing about it i will let the SE asian countries' policy do the talking..

As for me, all is well that ends well !
 
On topic, India is most certainly going to pass Japan's GDP one day. So it makes sense that India would be more important as a long-term economic partner than Japan, unless Japan can restart their economic growth.
 
Right now Chinese are thinking Bullying will do the trick and aggressive expansion is the way forward.

Truth is this policy is what made China a problematic Neighbor all around in Asia.

India do need good relations with China, But at the same time lets concentrate on deterrence and building strong economy so that Chinese will never do these kind of stupid things.
 
This is true the incident aint as bad as india media make it out to be

No-in strategic terms the incident really was serious.

On topic, India is most certainly going to pass Japan's GDP one day. So it makes sense that India would be more important as a long-term economic partner than Japan, unless Japan can restart their economic growth.

I've never understood why you don't make peace with the japs
 
No-in strategic terms the incident really was serious.



I've never understood why you don't make peace with the japs

We have had no cross-border bloodshed on our borders for over 30 years.

If that is not peace, then what is?
 
This was bound to happen. Media is in habit of making sensational news and getting people emotional . No need for emotions where diplomacy should be applied. We must not disregard ground realities in such situations.
 
Japan is a natural partner for India with no major issues sticking out - Japan is investing heavily in the Mumbai-Delhi corridor and Chennai-Bangalore corridor - don't know the investment budget of Japan for the Mumbai-Delhi corridor but Chennai-Bangalore corridor is around $100 billion and these kinds of investments is needed if India need to meet the growth expectations.

On the other hand, China and India has not only the sticky border issue but also the issue about China supporting Pakistan, the question about string of pearls not to mention the long term conflict(not necessarily military) when they vie for resources and political influence globally.

In short, in the long term alignment of different countries, Japan and India are natural partners while India and China are not. (considering that China and Japan are not going to align themselves atleast in the next couple of decades due to the bad blood between them going back to WW2 days)
 
This is true the incident aint as bad as india media make it out to be

Your right, Indian media went apesh!t on it, and rightly so I guess because the Chinese have preferred to be ambiguous about the relationship with India and nobody in India has a proper clue as to what's going on in the minds of the CCP.

On the one hand Indian leadership thought that we together were turning a new corner and things were coming back to normal when we suddenly see Chinese intruding into our territory and refusing to leave.
 
Japan is a natural partner for India with no major issues sticking out - Japan is investing heavily in the Mumbai-Delhi corridor and Chennai-Bangalore corridor - don't know the investment budget of Japan for the Mumbai-Delhi corridor but Chennai-Bangalore corridor is around $100 billion and these kinds of investments is needed if India need to meet the growth expectations.

On the other hand, China and India has not only the sticky border issue but also the issue about China supporting Pakistan, the question about string of pearls not to mention the long term conflict(not necessarily military) when they vie for resources and political influence globally.

In short, in the long term alignment of different countries, Japan and India are natural partners while India and China are not. (considering that China and Japan are not going to align themselves atleast in the next couple of decades due to the bad blood between them going back to WW2 days)

All very well if japan is your natural partner then why having all that issues between china and india we are your biggest trading partner and not japan?i also don't get where you got that $100billion investment from is it not a small number can you provide a link ?
 
Well One think I also appreciate after whatever happened, stand offs intrusions, regiments moving, etc etc in the end both the military withdrew and not a single bullet was fired.
 
Back
Top Bottom