Chinese-Dragon
RETIRED TTA
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 33,932
- Reaction score
- 52
- Country
- Location
No. Turning down the Gwadar scenario is quite sensible for China. Pakistan has more baggage's than advantage in setting up a military base.
Pakistan as such is an instable country, a Balochistan in particular is a very volatile region where the local population dislikes foreigners. There is an active insurgency in Balochistan. And there have been examples of Chinese citizens being killed by them.
Pakistan, unlike China cannot kill off these insurgencies with a heavy hand in today's information age.
And it is obvious that Pakistan is trying to get China to set up a base to get security cover in that region, particularly piss off the Americans and Indians. Get international recognition that Pakistan is a stable country, while getting Chinese to be even more committed to Pakistan's security!
Whereas all that China wants is a pipeline from Gwadar to China and a trade route. Both of which cannot be defended by PLAN even while sitting at Gwadar port.
Secondly, were PLAN to maintain a base at Gwadar, they would need to be supplied massively and any connection inevitably goes from Malacca Straits, which is very very vulnerable by both Indian and US Navy.
Thirdly, while Pakistan wants China to be involved in security of Pakistan, Pakistan's actions on international stage - like supporting terrorism, Taliban, occupying Kargil, its military fostering islamic insurgents from all over the globe would inevitably put China in a tough spot were the international community to get riled by Pakistan's actions.
And China has a lot more trade with these countries than the main benefit that Pakistan provides - a shorter route for oil and a way to keep India occupied.
So from a cost-benefit perspective, it does not make any sense for China to have a military base in Pakistan.
However as for a military base in other countries - I would not have an idea. Sri Lanka has expressly denied that their port would ever be given for military purposes, it is solely a commercial port.
That seems like a reasonable analysis.
We're obviously not interested in pissing off America + India in the IOR just for fun, we aren't Russia or France (who both enjoy pissing of the USA just for the sake of it). For us it has to be about the monetary or strategic gains, the cost/benefit ratio.