China's new strategic bomber: H-6K mass produced

[Amolthebest]

Increasing post count , huh ?

You caught me

 

[Secur]

Nice 50 years old Tu-16. Very cutting edge

Yes it is , 50 years old assuming that China isn't capable of reverse engineering , innovation , designing and creating aircrafts ... But **** , what are J 10 , J 11 and J 20 - not to mention a **** load of copied aircraft then ?

Before jumping on the bandwagon , why didn't you research a little ?

The H-6K, first flying on 5 January 2007,[4] entered service in October 2009 during the celebrations of the 60th anniversary of the People's Republic of China,[5] and is claimed to give China its first proper strategic bomber.[5][6] With a reinforced structure making use of composite materials,[6] enlarged engine inlets for Russian NPO Saturn D-30KP-2 turbofan engines giving a claimed combat radius of 3,500 kilometres (2,200 mi),[5] a glass cockpit with large size LCD multi-function display,[7] and a reworked nose section eliminating the glazed navigator's station in favour of a more powerful radar, the H-6K is a significantly more modern aircraft than earlier versions. The bomb bay has been replaced by extra fuel capacity, and six underwing pylons for CJ-10A cruise missiles are fitted. The rear 23mm guns and gunner position are replaced by electronic components.[7]
In January 2009, it was reported that an indigenous turbofan engine, the WS-18, was under development for use in the H-6K.[8]

 

[tvsram1992]

whats wrong in it?
KH 55 seriously increased attack capability of TU 95
TU 95 MS, a variant of TU 95 is specially built to carry KH 55 cruise missiles

Defense network is denser on land when compared to sea . When Chinese mostly has border with most of the countries whats the point in launching Cruise missiles form air when they have land ? Tu95 was not meant for this century . Any strategic bomber except B2 is a white elephant and it can be shot down easily with long range SAMs and missiles like novator .

 

[tvsram1992]

Better you concentrate on completing the 3 decade old project before flaming ... You mean like the minister of Gujrat who's plane was shot down inside Indian airspace ?

BTW , I heard the PLA chopper intruded somewhere again ?

Please take care of drones and then speak about intrusion Dont be an idiot . know the reason for the crash of plane before making such idiotic comments .

 

[tvsram1992]

LOL at indian inferiority. You can't even stop PLA combat helicopters from violating your airspace. http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/167005-pla-choppers-violate-indian-airspace.html
LOL at indian inferiority. india is just a third world hole that can't even manufacture a bullet.

You should be in Guinness book of world records for having such a long Chinese wet dream . Still feeling humiliated for 1979? Curse your govt for not letting info of how many times we violated your space . Your govt dont care your opinion and thought it would be waste to tell you details . They are dealing soft with India because they are scared that we will give you the fate of your red master USSR of 1991 . Third world hole is better than a red hole .

 

[tvsram1992]

man ur feeling hake of pain in ur a........ lolllllllllllllllll don,t worry get some medicine u b alright and don,t worry about what fate they meet

Its your a** that is burning . Why would i feel pain when you lose your aircrafts ? Grow up kid

 

[tvsram1992]

yes man its dum..... Indian can fire shoulder launch cruse missiles and these chines are using bombers i agree with u sir

To counter your nuke grenades we should have shoulder launched missiles/defence . Yes they are cruise missiles but they have very little range enough to destroy an F16 ie near . YOu know that we have 400km ranged A2A missile . Oh thats why Chinese are making bombers

 

[Mech]

I see a Tu-16. The only "improvement" here is the name.

 

[Contract Killer]

it seems there is bonus distribution in CPC headquarter today.

Yes it is , 50 years old assuming that China isn't capable of reverse engineering , innovation , designing and creating aircrafts ... But **** , what are J 10 , J 11 and J 20 - not to mention a **** load of copied aircraft then ?

Before jumping on the bandwagon , why didn't you research a little ?

The H-6K, first flying on 5 January 2007,[4] entered service in October 2009 during the celebrations of the 60th anniversary of the People's Republic of China,[5] and is claimed to give China its first proper strategic bomber.[5][6] With a reinforced structure making use of composite materials,[6] enlarged engine inlets for Russian NPO Saturn D-30KP-2 turbofan engines giving a claimed combat radius of 3,500 kilometres (2,200 mi),[5] a glass cockpit with large size LCD multi-function display,[7] and a reworked nose section eliminating the glazed navigator's station in favour of a more powerful radar, the H-6K is a significantly more modern aircraft than earlier versions. The bomb bay has been replaced by extra fuel capacity, and six underwing pylons for CJ-10A cruise missiles are fitted. The rear 23mm guns and gunner position are replaced by electronic components.[7]
In January 2009, it was reported that an indigenous turbofan engine, the WS-18, was under development for use in the H-6K.[8]

China does same like this to the original product.........

Lol... And then they call it with some fancy name.

 

[Secur]

^^

The funny thing is that Indians cant even do that

I see a Tu-16. The only "improvement" here is the name.

Are you the same who thinks two things are same just because they look alike ? Gosh ! IQ theory is correct !

To counter your nuke grenades we should have shoulder launched missiles/defence . Yes they are cruise missiles but they have very little range enough to destroy an F16 ie near . YOu know that we have 400km ranged A2A missile . Oh thats why Chinese are making bombers

Here comes a joker , try launching them at 400 km

 

[SamantK]

^^

The funny thing is that Indians cant even do that

For Pakistan what is more funny is that till the time India 'cant even do that' it has money to buy 'that'.

 

[Secur]

Please take care of drones and then speak about intrusion Dont be an idiot . know the reason for the crash of plane before making such idiotic comments .

I will , let some beg to open supply route

How many times have the PLA intruded all over the Line of Actual Control by the way ?

For Pakistan what is more funny is that till the time India 'cant even do that' it has money to buy 'that'.

Even Arabs have , so ? Are they successful and self reliant ?

You should be in Guinness book of world records for having such a long Chinese wet dream . Still feeling humiliated for 1979?

**** ! Aren't you for losing Aksai Chin ( 38 000 km2 ) and other areas and being butchered by PLA all along in '62 ?

Indians are very happy to bring some minor border skirmishes

 

[tvsram1992]

^^
The funny thing is that Indians cant even do that

We will make original one and you beg others for aid to buy them .

Are you the same who thinks two things are same just because they look alike ? Gosh ! IQ theory is correct !

No he dont mean its a copy of Tu16 but even worse .

Here comes a joke , try launching them at 400 km

then i would say to test your ICBM and Chinese Dongfengs .

 

[SamantK]

^^ Dude, as I said till the time we are not we have the money, it does not have any thing to do with Success.. self-reliance will come slowly till that time we are prepared to defend and in the process have the best technology available.. Facepalm!

 

[Secur]

We will make original one and you beg others for aid to buy them .

No he dont mean its a copy of Tu16 but even worse .

then i would say to test your ICBM and Chinese Dongfengs .

Original one ? Try completing the project started 30 years ago and ill fated Kaveri then try to compare yourself with China which is completely self reliant in defense field I will spare you the INSAS dilemma

Whatever he meant , he had no idea what he was talking about ...

Ohhh yeah , the " this is a copy of this " theory starting again

They are dealing soft with India because they are scared that we will give you the fate of your red master USSR of 1991 . Third world hole is better than a red hole .

Actually , we broke that red hole once and forever

And that resulted in "

1991 Sino-Soviet Border Agreement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why did your masters at Kremlin ceded land to China if they they had so won ?

According to the estimates by Boris Tkachenko, a Russian historian, the treaty resulted in net territorial gain for China, which received about 720 km², including some seven hundred islands. [1]