What's new

China's New Stealth Bomber: H-X / H-20

  • You just remind me of a member with such cool ID "sinosoldier", being less active here but quite active at SDF, still he's keeping on watching closely at PDF at this column and often ask lots of investigative questions :D seems to behave normally —merely a netizen with an avid interests for Chinese Military— but actually maintaining a very negative, anti-China mindset (though he wrapped up his words as a staunch anti-CCP actually).

sinosoldier is still very active here, he merely changed his id to "Akasa", with 2 Canadian flags.
 
. . .
sinosoldier is still very active here, he merely changed his id to "Akasa", with 2 Canadian flags.
My goodness, no wonder I sensed the same pattern of behaviours and attitudes.... Quite curious, very investigative...
But I Just learn it from your post.

And I feel greatly amazed WHY an old time member here changed his nick when his existing one is not banned??? Or maintain some duality or even more forum personas... and the known IDs all come with the senior ratings :woot: ,,,, what immense efforts being poured in to attain those levels. But What for indeed?? :o:o_O

@星海军事 okay fair enough, I can see your explanation, though not necessarily I shall agree with what you take. Just for the sake of clarity, myself is far from fantasizing, for basically I am a realist pragmatist, as well as not favouring to go beyond what I know... Both deliberate underrating and overrating are not my cup of tea. And I am patient enough to wait the hard outcomes over time…
 
Last edited:
.
It would be nice if you could post a translation.

The photo compare the Chinese Navy and South Vietnam Navy back in 1970s.

Under the ship it said

"Chinese Mine Sweeper 300 - 500 tons" and "South Vietnam US made destroyer, 1500 to 2000 tons"
 
. .
That's right, but could you start a new thread for that? Thanks.
205256v139n1gffd8mr2bh.jpg


3af303537b2ff1b2ef600201047c62af.jpg

aa23fff66f4b7a6e7a3110db3120b309.jpg


93d9d0ff5a1364cc7c50c8409b6ab47a.jpg

30d4d79e26a7ddc15a004a6f8eb955cc.jpg
 
. .
There are rumors from multiple sources around in China's military themed BBS for a while: It seems that SAC/601 have been developing a stealth fighter-bomber that aiming at replacing J/H-7 and Su-30 fleet, and the fighter-bomber is about to take maiden flight.

The fighter-bomber will have similiar capability/role like F-111 or Su-34, so no Tu-26-like bomber.

It seems that this is SAC/601's first priority project that much more likely to recieve orders from PLAAF/PLAN, instead of their FC-31 which still find no customers.
 
.
There are rumors from multiple sources around in China's military themed BBS for a while: It seems that SAC/601 have been developing a stealth fighter-bomber that aiming at replacing J/H-7 and Su-30 fleet, and the fighter-bomber is about to take maiden flight.

The fighter-bomber will have similiar capability/role like F-111 or Su-34, so no Tu-26-like bomber.

It seems that this is SAC/601's first priority project that much more likely to recieve orders from PLAAF/PLAN, instead of their FC-31 which still find no customers.
A dedicated stealthy medium range bomber.

Much Faster than H6K, maybe less payload.

A very good initiative by SAC.

The name is JH17

The project is totally a surprise.
 
. . . .
I'd like to see some links, please. Without credible sources, these claims are as good as hot air.

In terms of achieve something, China seldom do empty brags or hot air, unlike india which is full of empty talks and hot air, so just be quiet, and besides that bomber is not for your weak country, it is for the US, so go bark elsewhere.

http://www.fyjs.cn/thread-1903862-1-1.html
3f358a54564e9258c26d4aa59082d158ccbf4e32.jpg
 
.
In terms of achieve something, China seldom do empty brags or hot air, unlike india which is full of empty talks and hot air, so just be quiet, and besides that bomber is not for your weak country, it is for the US, so go bark elsewhere.

http://www.fyjs.cn/thread-1903862-1-1.html
3f358a54564e9258c26d4aa59082d158ccbf4e32.jpg

The picture you've posted is of a model, not an actual prototype or even a developmental testbed. Don't count your chickens before they hatch. :)
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom