What's new

China's Blitzkrieg on U.S. Carrier

Status
Not open for further replies.
By 2025, 60% of all US forces will be in the Pacific. And not only that, South Korea, Japan, Australia, Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan, Thailand, Singapore and others are all US allies and will join forces to fight China and with years of buying Arms from USA, all of them will very lethal foes to China.

The more aircraft and ships the US moves within missile range the better.:lol:

vT54r.jpg
 
.
The more aircraft and ships the US moves within missile range the better.:lol:

vT54r.jpg

Actually allowing many within range is bad for China. Most already have the ability to hit targets far beyond the range of SAMs and surface to surface missiles.

With the exception of your so called carrier killer missile if it works and the consequences of launching a ballistic type missile which be conceived as a nuclear attack since that is what it is, a ballistic missile designed for nuclear warheads.
 
.
Actually allowing many within range is bad for China. Most already have the ability to hit targets far beyond the range of SAMs and surface to surface missiles.

With the exception of your so called carrier killer missile if it works and the consequences of launching a ballistic type missile which be conceived as a nuclear attack since that is what it is, a ballistic missile designed for nuclear warheads.

Go ahead and bring everything within missile range.:lol:

Aircraft will be destroyed on parkings ramps and ships will be destroyed in port.:lol:

CJ-10-GLCM-TEL-2009-1S.jpg


If you go nuclear, China goes nuclear. Simple.:lol:

DF-31A-ICBM-TEL-2009-1S.jpg
 
.
Actually allowing many within range is bad for China. Most already have the ability to hit targets far beyond the range of SAMs and surface to surface missiles.

With the exception of your so called carrier killer missile if it works and the consequences of launching a ballistic type missile which be conceived as a nuclear attack since that is what it is, a ballistic missile designed for nuclear warheads.
Let the kid masturbate to his own fantasies. Keep in mind that all the China Chinese on this forum are essentially conscript rejects. On the one hand they are glad they were rejected for military service for one reason or another, on the other hand, it is highly incongruous for them to participate on a military oriented discussion forum and pound their (military) chests for China. You can practically see the internal conflicts.
 
.
Go ahead and bring everything within missile range.:lol:

Aircraft will be destroyed on parkings ramps and ships will be destroyed in port.:lol:

CJ-10-GLCM-TEL-2009-1S.jpg


If you go nuclear, China goes nuclear. Simple.:lol:

DF-31A-ICBM-TEL-2009-1S.jpg

US will neva leave it's carrier defenseless.... They are decades ahead of you..... credibility of chinese weapons still question mark in front of US..... you might built or copied lots of weapons ,jets etc within short period but US is technologically quantitatively and qualitatively ahead of you..... No one knows what kinda secret weapons they got.... you are talking about 2025 that means 13 years more...do you think they will sitting ducks and watching you in this period???? they will come more modern weapons than what you think..... lolz what an ignorant .... you can't win war with just missiles....
 
.
Go ahead and bring everything within missile range.:lol:

Aircraft will be destroyed on parkings ramps and ships will be destroyed in port.:lol:

CJ-10-GLCM-TEL-2009-1S.jpg


If you go nuclear, China goes nuclear. Simple.:lol:

DF-31A-ICBM-TEL-2009-1S.jpg

I don't think so. China has complained about the Missile Defense. And we do have submarines that can launch hundreds of cruise missiles without being detected. We have jammers and decoys that act as jammers so you know what happens.
 
. .
Annhiliate? :rofl:

US is scaling down its forces in the Middle East and building up its forces in the Pacific and by 2025, US will have new weapon systems that will negate all advantages that China has such as their Carrier Killer Missile.

By 2025, 60% of all US forces will be in the Pacific. And not only that, South Korea, Japan, Australia, Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan, Thailand, Singapore and others are all US allies and will join forces to fight China and with years of buying Arms from USA, all of them will very lethal foes to China.

Any China vs USA war in 2025, will look like what happened to Iraq during the Gulf War, when all of the American Arab Allies joined forces to fight Saddam.



So you think China versus US in 2025 will be like US versus Iraq in 1991?

For starters, there is that small thing of the Chinese economy surpassing the US well before 2025 even comes around. Current predictions say this will happen before 2020. Add in the Chinese PPP advantage and China is likely to be twice as rich as the US by 2025. China will out build US in everything and have a greater market than the US in pretty much everything as well. Annoy China and you lose the largest market in the world.

US did not become the greatest power by the force of it's military but by also being the richest economy. That baton is very close to being passed to China soon.

And you seriously think that all those non-nuclear countries will risk nuclear destruction to fight with the US then? One Chinese thermonuclear weapon and there is no more Singapore.

Please impress me with an intelligent reply.

this missile is nothing more than a minor thought to US mission planners ..

You don't know that.

That missile is only a small part of the Chinese armoury anyway.

China will have aircraft carriers, destroyers, nuclear submarines, cruise missiles, ballistics missiles and land-based missiles and aircraft to pummel the US.

My bet is that the US will accept reality and leave Asia to the Chinese. They do not care as much about Asia as the Chinese do.
 
.
And you seriously think that all those non-nuclear countries will risk nuclear destruction to fight with the US then? One Chinese thermonuclear weapon and there is no more Singapore.

The same question applies to the US as well.

Is the US willing to risk nuclear destruction to protect Vietnam and the Philippines's oil claims?

I think we all know the answer to that. :lol:

ChinaNuclearPowerPlants.jpg
[/IMG]
 
.
So you think China versus US in 2025 will be like US versus Iraq in 1991?

For starters, there is that small thing of the Chinese economy surpassing the US well before 2025 even comes around. Current predictions say this will happen before 2020. Add in the Chinese PPP advantage and China is likely to be twice as rich as the US by 2025. China will out build US in everything and have a greater market than the US in pretty much everything as well. Annoy China and you lose the largest market in the world.

US did not become the greatest power by the force of it's military but by also being the richest economy. That baton is very close to being passed to China soon.

And you seriously think that all those non-nuclear countries will risk nuclear destruction to fight with the US then? One Chinese thermonuclear weapon and there is no more Singapore.

Please impress me with an intelligent reply.

China may surpass US in overall economic terms but per person, US is miles ahead. China has 1.2 Billion people, where as US has 300 million. So Americans are more wealthy and have more purchasing power than an ordinary Chinese.

China has dire needs in its rural areas where it needs to pump money and improve living conditions. As Chinese cities prosper, funds need to be transferred to help rurual china improve. those Chinese farmers rioting a few months ago is a testament of the growing civil disturbance occuring in rural china.

If China launches a nuclear strike on those countries, then USA will launch a nuclear strike on China.

The war could be kept non-nuclear like the Korean War.

Overall, the likelyhood of a US-China war is very low. Both countires are intertwined economically, and both countries will be heavily damaged by a war. Chinese aggression can be kept in check if USA continues to build up Militaries of chinese rivals in the periphery of China.

In other words, China will never dominate the world the way USA has done since 1941 - present.
 
.
Japan is not US.

DF-21D and Type-095 SSNs will await the US carriers.

Anyway China will not go to war till around 2025, when it will have enough resources to annihilate US forces in the Eastern Pacific.

Remember China will have "home-turf" advantage so all the US will have will be what they have on their carrier battle groups.China will have it's whole Navy, Airforce and missiles based on land to pummel the US Navy.

China does not have the home turf advantage because the U.S. Navy will pummel all the naval bases, airbases, sink all its ships, etc. And we haven't included the Air Force. Thousands of long range cruise missiles, decoys, jamming, decoy jammers, long range glide bombs, etc.

The same question applies to the US as well.

Is the US willing to risk nuclear destruction to protect Vietnam and the Philippines's oil claims?

I think we all know the answer to that. :lol:

ChinaNuclearPowerPlants.jpg
[/IMG]

Would China risk annihilation for the South China Sea? Doubt it.

Chinese P-3 Orion will counter the submarines. :lol:

Y-8GX6+four-engine+turboprop+anti-submarine+and+maritime+surveillance+aircraft+Chinese+P-3C+People%2527s+Liberation+Army+Navy+%2528PLA+export+pakitan+naval+mines+t+torpedoes+Active+passive+Sonobuoys+anti-sh.jpg


Y-8GX6+four-engine+turboprop+anti-submarine+and+maritime+surveillance+aircraft+Chinese+P-3C+People%2527s+Liberation+Army+Navy+%2528PLA+export+pakitan+naval+mines+t+torpedoes+Active+passive+Sonobuoys.jpg


Y-8GX6+four-engine+turboprop+anti-submarine+and+maritime+surveillance+aircraft+Chinese+P-3C+People%2527s+Liberation+Army+Navy+%2528PLA+export+pakitan+naval+mines+t+torpedoes+Active+passive+Sonobuoys+%25282%2529.jpg

They be shot down before they even get out to sea. Remember your aircraft has to travel at least 1000km to find the boats.
 
.
China does not have the home turf advantage because the U.S. Navy will pummel all the naval bases, airbases, sink all its ships, etc.

What US Navy? Chinese missiles will pummel all US naval bases, airbases, and the DF-21D will sink all ships. :lol:

And we haven't included the Air Force. Thousands of long range cruise missiles, decoys, jamming, decoy jammers, long range glide bombs, etc.

What US Air Force? Chinese missiles already pummeled all your airbases. :lol:

vT54r.jpg
 
.
What US Navy? Chinese missiles will pummel all US naval bases, airbases, and the DF-21D will sink all ships. :lol:



What US Air Force? Chinese missiles already pummeled all your airbases. :lol:

vT54r.jpg

Sigh* You expect that we can't reach your mainland without airbases. Keep thinking that. Study Doolittle Raid when Japan thought they were safe.

Also that attack change everything for Japanese thinking because they couldn't believe the bombers could have hit them unless we had an airbase nearby. Hence the plan to attack Midway which led to the destruction of their carriers.
 
.
If the US ever f**ks with us again, we will kick their arse just like we did in the Korean war. PLA is undefeated in military warfare. We kicked the Japs out of china, kicked the KMT out, humiliated the US in Korean war, made a complete mockery of India in 1962, smacked the soviet union in the border conflict, took our islands back by smashing Vietnam, stopped the Vietnamese aggression in 1979.

PLA is undefeated in military warfare. And that was before any economic reforms or military modernization.

If the United States or any other aggressive regime crosses the red line, we will impose maximum possible punishment.
 
.
'Quasi' what the what now?

It means not purely balistic.

ahhh you haven't been keeping up with current events..

this is our resident magician. His favourite trick is writing like that.

Don't worry you will see this alot. He probably got it from a wikipedia page. It is his only source.

For you who claim as aviation expert, it is not acceptable if you dont know what quasi ballistic means. And no, it is not must always from wikipedia :tdown:

How about you telling us where this modern radar will be housed! because if it is housed inside the quasi ballistic missile :rofl: of yours .. a butterfly flapping its wings is equally reliable with chaff! if it is on land then let me laugh some more..

:rofl:

Do you realize that no spec of this weapon released by PRC?

But you can explain why you think that a butterfly flapping its wings is equally reliable with chaff?
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom