What's new

China's anti-ship missiles and Gorshkov

Status
Not open for further replies.
well china USA has

my point of concern is that china can give this tech to Pakistan by backdoor

i don't see any point India and china going for war anytime soon. Whereas Pakistan political goal is destablising India centric, so u cant rule out them not going to war.

Good to see india is moving away from pakistan illusion. India should start thinking more global now then regional scale.
 
.
i don't see any point India and china going for war anytime soon. Whereas Pakistan political goal is destablising India centric, so u cant rule out them not going to war.

Good to see india is moving away from pakistan illusion. India should start thinking more global now then regional scale.

well we were never Pakistan illusion as an country we have to think and act the best way

can you provide 100% guarantee no war take place

well you cant rule out war must be take place between china and India but don't know when
 
.
India and PAK,no one can take over another,only way to solve the poblem is to back the desk and talk~~
 
.
point is Pakistan cant challenge India and also India cant challenge China. its Pakistans need that India dont start a war and also Indias need that China dont start it either.

till that time deplomacy is the better option to resolve the differances.
 
.
We have to build up anti Ballistic missile defence as well as stealth capabilities in our AC.
 
.
India and PAK,no one can take over another,only way to solve the poblem is to back the desk and talk~~

Actually we could've broke up Pakistan into pieces back in the Bangla war but China and USA pressure made Indira Gandhi change her mind.
 
.
Actually we could've broke up Pakistan into pieces back in the Bangla war but China and USA pressure made Indira Gandhi change her mind.

Yea,look at USF at Iraq and Afghanistan,you can take over a gov of a weak country but can't even take over a weak country like Afghanistan~~~
 
.
We have to build up anti Ballistic missile defence as well as stealth capabilities in our AC.

yes my concern is about the coming AC from Russia and our home made AC

is AC has capability to counter super sonic AC killer missile

the reaction time will be just 30 second to save AC
 
.
well...china will not fight india with ballistic anti-ship missiles anyways, that is only for ruffling the us's feathers not india's. the threat from china is the pace of modernization not a single weapon plus currently an india carrier in chinese waters is dead-meat, same for plan in indian waters thus in terms of naval power things are fairly balanced you cant come to my yard i cant go to yours, though what you should worry about is again the pace that china builds up its navy which may undo this balance in the future but i sure india will respond in time.

this is the prob for the plan, if there is a blockade in the IOR on their oil supply, plan can do NOTHING past the malaca straights.
 
.
well we were never Pakistan illusion as an country we have to think and act the best way

can you provide 100% guarantee no war take place

well you cant rule out war must be take place between china and India but don't know when

People were saying China and Soviet Union might head for full scale war after sino-soviet split - But now relations are good and conflict is unlikely.

So no reason why India and China can't be friends.
 
.
well develop something like aegis,that should b the next move
 
.
We have already got our revenge....Zizang is still occupied by eveil India...:lol:



True...The Indian AC is aimed at projecting power only in the IOR.not in South China sea.
The logic is simple here.....U dont come into my backyard...I wont come into urs.

lol, Zi what?

We have to build up anti Ballistic missile defence as well as stealth capabilities in our AC.

I don't think it's terribly cost effective. It takes so much more money to develop and deploy an ABM system than a BM system. Even the U.S. hasn't developed anything that can effectively counter that and their nascent ABM systems are barely deployed.
 
. .
We have already got our revenge....Zizang is still occupied by eveil India...:lol:

It's Xizang if you are referring to the mandarin pronunciation of Tibet

Now Zizang means something else entirely!
 
.
I don't think it's terribly cost effective. It takes so much more money to develop and deploy an ABM system than a BM system. Even the U.S. hasn't developed anything that can effectively counter that and their nascent ABM systems are barely deployed.
This is a laughable argument. The US under Raygun began the Strategic Defense Initiative, aka 'Star Wars', only in the R/D stage, which is the most time and money consuming part of any project, and the Soviets nearly had a heart attack. The scientific divide was split quite even inside the Soviet scientific circle, not about if the US has the technological capability to do it, but whether or not the US is willing to devote the necessary finance and technological resources to achieve the program within their lifetime. The technological hurdles were great but no one was willing to put his diploma on the line by using the word 'impossible'. The examinations of the details did of course would swayed some scientists to the 'nyet' camp, but only if there was a time constraint. But once those time constraints were removed, all agreed that between the US and the USSR, it would be the US who would rendered all Soviet nuclear ballistic missiles financially worthless. When Gorby could not convinced Raygun to stop the program, the Soviet Union collapsed and SDI, even as an R/D project, contributed to that collapse.

Please...Stop believing in 'Chinese physics'.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom