China will have the highest GDP per capita among BRICS countries.

[terranMarine]

see chinese<although I am pretty sure many of you are from pakistan>
just few decades ago china's GDP was even lower than India, new found wealth has made you han's arrogant.
Just few decades ago there were million dying of hunger in china did you forgot famines in mao's era million dead.

Just few decades ago chinese felt lucky if they get some bugs from ground to eat so don't let this new found wealth get in to your head. Countries progress with time, India is not at the same place it was 5 years ago china a dirt poor country just few decades ago with GDP less than India has progressed also so there is no point showing your arrogant self here.
Thank USA and Japanese cos who shifted their manufacturing to china otherwise chinese would still be eating bugs from ground.

Thanks to Japanese my arse, China has always been the most wealthiest. Perhaps you have missed the thread 6000 tonnes of Gold stolen by Japanese invaders. Yet despite the Korean War, Vietnam War, fighting against Vietnam and India plus the Cultural Revolution China had to endure China has surpassed all these Western economic giants and is on its way to be the biggest displacing USA. An achievement only Indians can dream of.

 

[EAsian]

ROFL

We have risen from bottom to the top compared with other so called BRICS country.Now we are 5 times richer than indian,when two decades ago we are almost the same.

 

[CCP]

haha man seems like you are really enraged so tell me you don't like the truth?

and above ladies and gentleman is an example of how TRUTH HURTS might han iq.

Which truth were you talking about?

Do you mean the truth that indian GDP is only 19% of China's?
I don't think that can hurt me.

 

[Sasquatch]

Threads cleaned up two members have been banned and others have been given infractions.

 

[Bussard Ramjet]

Wow, so pricey, how can most people afford when you earn so little average income?

Trust me, you get nothing in delhi for 1000 rs. (15 dollars)

 

[大汉奸柳传志]

Trust me, you get nothing in delhi for 1000 rs. (15 dollars)

See, this is exactly why India cannot grow as fast as China. land and property price is already way too high in Indian cities witch will greatly handicap its potential of industrialization and urbanization.

Some say India is 15 years behind China but China around 2000 was already the world factory and the real estate was very cheap（about a quarter of today‘s），witch later on lead to the rapid urbanization.

Time for India to wake up and kiss your Modi magic goodbye, along with your “double digit” blah blah bullshit.

 

[Neemo neemo]

Wow, so pricey, how can most people afford when you earn so little average income?

Law of averaging out. Everyone doesn't live in Delhi.


People are also poor here just like in China.

 

[Shotgunner51]

China (even excluding Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR, Taiwan) is far bigger in economic size, trade clout, fiscal capacity and industrial capacity than all the rest combined. By now BRICS has no material relevance except NDB (New Development Bank).

China is a trade surplus nation (#1 largest), and a creditor nation (Mainland #2, Greater China #1). Except Russia, others are trade deficit, debtor nations.

China has far more $ millionaire households (Boston Consulting Group Report 2014; '000) than the rest of BRICS combined, except for Russia others are nowhere insight.

China is far bigger than, far wealthier, and different from, rest of BRICS. Let's not compare.

 

[AndrewJin]

Law of averaging out. Everyone doesn't live in Delhi.


People are also poor here just like in China.

Don't compare low income country to middle income country.

 

[AndrewJin]

China (even excluding Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR, Taiwan) is far bigger in economic size, trade clout, fiscal capacity and industrial capacity than all the rest combined. By now BRICS has no material relevance except NDB (New Development Bank).

China is a trade surplus nation (#1 largest), and a creditor nation (Mainland #2, Greater China #1). Except Russia, others are trade deficit, debtor nations.

China has far more $ millionaire households (Boston Consulting Group Report 2014; '000) than the rest of BRICS combined, except for Russia others are nowhere insight.

View attachment 255017

China is far bigger than, far wealthier, and different from, rest of BRICS. Let's not compare.

I am always impressed by how confident they are even when they have lower GDP per capita than Sub-Saharan Africa. Everybody can brag, but bragging without achievements is so self-degrading.

 

[AndrewJin]

Thanks to Japanese my arse, China has always been the most wealthiest. Perhaps you have missed the thread 6000 tonnes of Gold stolen by Japanese invaders. Yet despite the Korean War, Vietnam War, fighting against Vietnam and India plus the Cultural Revolution China had to endure China has surpassed all these Western economic giants and is on its way to be the biggest displacing USA. An achievement only Indians can dream of.

They can dream of surpassing Sub-Sahara Africa in terms of GDP per capita soon.

 

[Shotgunner51]

They can dream of surpassing Sub-Sahara Africa in terms of GDP per capita soon.

Surpassing Sub-Saharan Africa? I don't think so, given SSA is one of the fastest growing region in the world (China invests heavily there), and that india ($1,630) is still ~10% behind SSA ($1,796) in 2014.

GDP per capita (current US$) | Data | Graph

Well they have similar literacy or IQ level so let's see how india vs Sub-Saharan Africa goes in the coming years.

My take is SSA will maintain a 10% lead or even wider, given they have bigger land, more natural resources, more investment (better infrastructure e.g. from China), and even better health! Did you see how Africans dominate the athletic sports?

 

[TaiShang]

Surpassing Sub-Saharan Africa? I don't think so, given SSA is one of the fastest growing region in the world (China invests heavily there), and that india ($1,630) is still ~10% behind SSA ($1,796) in 2014.

View attachment 255023
GDP per capita (current US$) | Data | Graph

Well they have similar literacy or IQ level so let's see how india vs Sub-Saharan Africa goes in the coming years.

My take is SSA will maintain a 10% lead or even wider, given they have bigger land, more natural resources, more investment (better infrastructure e.g. from China), and even better health! Did you see how Africans dominate the athletic sports?

Then the next target for India is to catch up with Sub Saharan levels before even dreaming of China.

It would be absurd if China claimed to catch up with the US in the 1970s.

In my view, catching up with the US makes sense only recently for China (maybe post-2008).

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

see chinese<although I am pretty sure many of you are from pakistan>
just few decades ago china's GDP was even lower than India, new found wealth has made you han's arrogant.
Just few decades ago there were million dying of hunger in china did you forgot famines in mao's era million dead.

Just few decades ago chinese felt lucky if they get some bugs from ground to eat so don't let this new found wealth get in to your head. Countries progress with time, India is not at the same place it was 5 years ago china a dirt poor country just few decades ago with GDP less than India has progressed also so there is no point showing your arrogant self here.
Thank USA and Japanese cos who shifted their manufacturing to china otherwise chinese would still be eating bugs from ground.

lmao China's average lifespan and literacy in 1970 are the same as India's today.

China built ICBMs and nuclear submarines in 1970 which you can't even do today.

There was a single famine in Mao era, which was the last famine of the 20th century in China (before that, there was a famine every 10 years). By Chinese nutritional standards, India is undergoing a famine right now.

 

[Shotgunner51]

Then the next target for India is to catch up with Sub Saharan levels before even dreaming of China.

It would be absurd if China claimed to catch up with the US in the 1970s.

In my view, catching up with the US makes sense only recently for China (maybe post-2008).

China isn't exactly claiming to "catch up" with US in many aspects, say in economic structure, taxation, weight of defense in national economy (DoD alone takes 4.5~5% of GDP, excluding other defense related branches), demographics (immigrant country), weight of virtual economy (US controls the international reserve currency), social welfare net, etc.

Instead, Mainland China's ultimate goals include full-scale industrialization, balance between market-driven commodity economy & state-driven social welfare (& infrastructure, i.e. balance between free market & socialism), low defense spend, homogeneous & cohesive demographics, and a favorable international trade structure, etc.

Therefore socio-economic models of some advanced economies in East Asia (including independent economies of Greater China) are better references, making more pragmatic benchmarks.