First of all, calling another person 50cent person without proof is just insult. That says a lot about you than the person being called.
Second, if china didn't recognize there is dispute then there would be no negotiation. Why wasting time negotiate for something that doesn't exist. It was india that refused to negotiate. Apparenly indian way of pushing it resolved was not through negotiation.
Third, claiming tibet doesn't belong to china is futile. It has been in china for hundreds of years and still in china's control. that fact wasn't hurting india in the beginning. Your claim is just a desperate attempt to make McMahon line legitimate.
Last, china is not mayanmar. It is silly to expect you work with everyone the same way. China also settle land dispute with parkistan. Can china request india to follow the same approach?
You don't need to dump the whole book. I am in US. I read from many sources.
