What's new

China studied the collapse of the Soviet Union and learned three lessons to avoid a similar fate

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
China studied the collapse of the Soviet Union and learned three lessons to avoid a similar fate

By Rebecca Armitage

Dec. 25 2021


It was at the end of the year, 30 years ago, that three men went to a country estate to go hunting, enjoy a steam bath and discuss oil and gas reserves over a few sips of brandy.

Instead, they ended up toppling an empire.

In retrospect, the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) had happened slowly, the rot of corruption, oppression and secrecy eating away at the foundations of a communist dream.

But, in December 1991, when the leaders of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus signed the Soviet Union's execution warrant, it shocked the world.

Not even the CIA had seen it coming.

"The USSR, as a geopolitical reality, and as a subject of international law, is ceasing to exist," they wrote in their agreement.
Mikhail Gorbachev — who was president of the Soviet Union at the time but a largely powerless figure by the end — officially stepped down and declared the USSR dead on Christmas Day, 1991.

The West spent the next three decades dancing around its corpse.

Meanwhile, another rising superpower spent 30 years performing an autopsy on the USSR, determined to avoid a similar fate.

'It's hard to overstate how obsessed they are'
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has written thousands of internal papers, held study sessions and even produced a documentary about the downfall of its former rival and ideological cousin.


"It's hard to overstate how obsessed they are with the Soviet Union," China expert David Shambaugh told the Washington Post.

"They wake up in the morning and go to sleep at night thinking about it. It hangs over every major decision."
The Chinese Communist Party, already one of the longest ruling political parties in the world, is determined to avoid the scrap heap of history.

"Why did the Soviet Union disintegrate?" Chinese leader Xi Jinping asked party officials in a leaked speech in 2012.

"An important reason was that their ideals and convictions wavered. In the end, nobody was a real man, nobody came out to resist."

Here are the three key decisions the CCP has made in a bid to outlive the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

1. Embrace capitalism … with 'Chinese characteristics'
China's greatest success was the Soviet Union's biggest catastrophe: The economy.

In the early days, the USSR was an economic rival to the United States, with a huge manufacturing capacity but, in the end, corruption destroyed efficiency.

By the final years, the USSR's economy was practically groaning with the costs of space and arms races with the US, and proxy wars in Latin America, Africa and Afghanistan.


The Soviet Union's planned economy was centrally controlled, beset by inefficiency, waste and shortages of goods.

"The ruble had only paper value, with Soviet citizens holding overall 400-450 billion rubles, but they had nothing to spend it on. Store shelves carried few consumer goods," said Diana Villiers Negroponte from the Brookings Institute.

Conscious of the USSR's blunders, Beijing rejected the socialist command economy, and embraced what it calls "capitalism with Chinese characteristics".

From the 1970s, the door was opened to foreign investment and poverty rates dropped as people flocked to cities for new, industrial jobs.

China joined the World Trade Organisation in 2001 and blossomed into the "world's factory" virtually overnight.

With state support, Chinese companies became manufacturing giants.


Despite slowing growth in recent years as it matured, China is projected by some economists to overtake the US as the world's largest economy by 2028.

China's leadership is determined to give its people a material standard of living similar to that found in any successful liberal economy.

But that does not mean it embraces Western values.

Many within Beijing's leadership consider a USSR policy called glasnost, that was promised by Gorbachev in the dying years of the union, to be a fatal error.

2. Manage the message
Glasnost — which roughly translates in English to openness — was Gorbachev's last-ditch gambit to save the USSR in the mid-80s.

After decades of censorship and secrecy, Gorbachev said the time had come for increased government transparency and freedom of expression.

Banned books were allowed to return to libraries, many citizens learned about former leader Joseph Stalin's atrocities for the first time, and Russians were suddenly exposed to the relatively luxurious lifestyles of those in Western democracies.


"[Glasnost] had the effect of stirring up waves of criticism that undermined authority and trust, and things quickly became shambolic," Diana Villiers Negroponte said.

The new policy of openness was adopted in the same year as a devastating nuclear accident in Chernobyl, and citizens used their newfound freedom of expression to express their outrage over the catastrophe.

"The Chernobyl disaster, more than anything else, opened the possibility of much greater freedom of expression in the Soviet Union, to the point that the system, as we knew it, became untenable," Gorbachev later said.

With that in mind, Beijing's leadership has been far more careful to manage the flow of information within China.

A combination of state laws and technology creates what is known as the Great Firewall of China, blocking or restricting access to Western sites, including Facebook, Google, Twitter and Wikipedia.

A six-part documentary that was mandatory viewing for Communist Party officials in 2013 placed the blame for the collapse of the USSR squarely on Gorbachev for inviting in Western influence.


The film, Silent Contest, warned that China could face a similar fate if it succumbed to "peaceful evolution".

That's based on a belief that the United States is slowly but surely trying to topple Beijing's leadership, not with bombs, but with democratic values.

Experts say that, among the more conservative members of the CCP, there is a fear that if they allow Western culture to take hold, a so-called "colour revolution" could follow.

Colour revolutions are peaceful uprisings against governments that first emerged in the former USSR.

"Anti-China forces have never given up their attempt to instigate a colour revolution in this country," officials wrote in China's 2015 defence white paper.

3. Watch the periphery
At its peak, the Soviet Union was the world's largest country, making up nearly one-seventh of the Earth's land surface.

However, within the behemoth nation were 15 dramatically different republics, dozens of ethnicities, languages and cultures.

First Poland broke away in 1989, followed by Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia. Soviet satellite states began to drift from the USSR's orbit.

By Christmas Day, 1991, all that was left was a significantly smaller Russia with three-quarters of the USSR's territory and half its population.

In contrast, Beijing has tried to keep regions on the periphery — Taiwan, Hong Kong, Xinjiang and Tibet — under increasingly tight control.

Huge pro-independence protests in Hong Kong in 2019 were derided by a top Beijing official as having "‘obvious characteristics of a colour revolution".

The protests did not end in widespread bloodshed but, instead, with the passage of a 2020 law that makes it easier to punish protesters and reduces the city's autonomy.

Can China's leaders avoid the USSR's fate?
Now 72, the People's Republic of China has outlived the USSR by three years.

The contrast between the Soviet Union in its dying days and modern China could not be more stark.

But the answer to the question of whether the CCP and its leader, Xi Jinping, can hold on to power in the long term depends on who you ask.

China as we know it has "peaked" according to Dan Blumenthal, the director of Asian studies at the American Enterprise Institute

"While China is acting to further [its] ever-grander ambitions, it is also facing profound internal problems and increasing rot in the party," he wrote in his book, The China Nightmare.


Those internal problems, according to Mr Blumenthal, include a looming labour shortage, an ageing population and "inefficient, state-owned enterprise".

But others have a far more optimistic view.

"China, in my opinion, is on the rise," former Russian parliamentarian Mikhail Chelnokov told Chinese tabloid the Global Times this week.

"China is gaining more and more power, politically, economically and militarily."

 
.
Looks like China is representing a new face of Communism.
But personally I reject the historical materialism aspect of Marxism.

Perhaps China will create a new version of Communism.
The sooner China rises, the better.

Because people in the Middle East see China as the alternative to USA or Russia.

We all hope China becomes the world's largest economy.

We Pakistanis should help them.
 
. .
It is mostly about how much material well being people are getting. The former USSR professors visit the west with supermarket fully stocked, and can walk into any Mcdonald for good food. At home he got to queue 30 minutes to buy a loaf of bread.

Soon all the USSR elites abandoned communism.

China got to make sure people far better in China than white man land.
 
.
I fail to understand how people call China a communist country. A country that producing billionaires after billionaires is a communist country!!
 
.
It is mostly about how much material well being people are getting. The former USSR professors visit the west with supermarket fully stocked, and can walk into any Mcdonald for good food. At home he got to queue 30 minutes to buy a loaf of bread.

Soon all the USSR elites abandoned communism.

China got to make sure people far better in China than white man land.
Interesting post. I doubt you are Vietnamese.

However Chinese should fare better in their homeland than in a Western country.
I fail to understand how people call China a communist country. A country that producing billionaires after billionaires is a communist country!!
Chinese are wise. They have adapted to the world situation. This has allowed them to out-compete their rivals.
 
.
I fail to understand how people call China a communist country. A country that producing billionaires after billionaires is a communist country!!

We are the Communist Party, but China is only a socialist country, not a communist country. Countries in which the Communist Party is in power do not have to practice communism.
Also, I don't think the Soviets are more qualified than the Chinese to decide what communism is.
 
.
ABC is a dishonest media propaganda tool.
China lesson on Soviet dissolution is not like that at all.

I fail to understand how people call China a communist country. A country that producing billionaires after billionaires is a communist country!!
China is not communist country at all. It's market-oriented economy
 
Last edited:
.
ABC is a dishonest media propaganda tool.
China lesson on Soviet dissolution is not like that at all.

China is not communist country at all. It's market-oriented economy

market is just a tool. it is like saying Christians cannot use computers because where's computers in the Bible?

the true question of whether an economy is capitalist or socialist is, who has the ultimate power? do billionaires have the power or do the people have the power? is society set up for the benefit of the billionaires and their cronies, or for maximum good for all?

basically, is it a society where Tesla solar shingles can exist as a viable product?
 
.
market is just a tool. it is like saying Christians cannot use computers because where's computers in the Bible?

the true question of whether an economy is capitalist or socialist is, who has the ultimate power? do billionaires have the power or do the people have the power? is society set up for the benefit of the billionaires and their cronies, or for maximum good for all?

basically, is it a society where Tesla solar shingles can exist as a viable product?
Market is a tool, but not only a tool. Market can and will change people's mind and society as well.

Once you adopt market oriented economy, the people will chase after money, the value system will change accordingly. There is no way that the political system can be isolated from the fundamental changes.

China has market oriented economy/politics oriented governance unusual dual structure, but how long it will last?

This is a job no one ever tried in human history, not in Europe, not in America. All those countries which adopted market oriented economy are capitalist society, no exceptions.

China history and culture may be the reason. China was politics oriented governance throughout history.
 
.
I have a different opinion. US market is heavily managed and central planned for important goods and services, not invisible hand.

The commodities are priced managed by means of future market. The healthcare by FDA and a few big medical cartel.

Unlike China, the main aim of US market manipulation is to enrich the 1%.
 
.
I fail to understand how people call China a communist country. A country that producing billionaires after billionaires is a communist country!!

More socialist then communist, sort of like the Nordic nations; SOEs and a lot of public works infrastructure to improve both the industrial possibilities for the companies as well as the standard of living of the people. The US had some similar elements during the industrialization of the 1870-1930s. From the mid to late 1940s onwards, As the world decolonized, the US acquired market share from the former European empires.

The US had economic stagnation about 40 years into this development, in the late 1910s, but when they got more market access they maximized the use of the industrial development and worker productivity. China could just be on the verge of doing the same as it climbs into more the value added products like aircraft, displacing current market leaders. That’s why BRI is essential. Unlike the Soviets, China isn’t squandering its resources on an arms race or propping up revolutionary governments.

A study of the US economy post WW1 and pre-1929 crash will reveal how the US economy evolved to move away from depending largely on the European export market and into a more diversified one, especially domestic consumption.

 
Last edited:
.
More socialist then communist, sort of like the Nordic nations; SOEs and a lot of public works infrastructure. The US had some similar elements during the industrialization of the 1870-1930s.

It is call China style socialism 中国特色社会主义。Unlike US, China is totally not interested in exporting her model because she think it is difficult to emulate.

Right now it seems more and more like imperial confucianism under the avatar of communism. In a stroke of luck, communism align with confucianism in many aspect, and hence I believe China style socialism will be there to stay.
 
.
It is call China style socialism 中国特色社会主义。Unlike US, China is totally not interested in exporting her model because she think it is difficult to emulate.

Right now it seems more and more like imperial confucianism under the avatar of communism. In a stroke of luck, communism align with confucianism in many aspect, and hence I believe China style socialism will be there to stay.

In fact, the PRC, or CCP, its political basis is the close alliance between Chinese left-wing Communists and right-wing nationalists, this cannot be done in other countries.
Chinese left-wing Communists are deeply influenced by Confucian culture and do not reject nationalism, and China's right-wing nationalists tried all the ways in the exploration of anti imperialism and rejuvenating Chinese civilization, and finally chose communism.
The close alliance between the two is the basis for CCP to maintain political stability and the stable development of China's economy. Even when China is hostile to the two superpowers of USA and USSR at the same time and there is a great famine in China, the alliance has never wavered.
The strange alliance between Communists and nationalists is also the reason why CCP gave birth to the theory of socialism with Chinese characteristics. This is why the CCP is so different from the Communist Party of other countries.
The CCP is not interested in export model to other countries because we know that it is impossible to copy China's political foundation in other countries. Now the formation of Chinese society has been influenced by too much history.

It is history that brings China's left and right together.
 
Last edited:
.
In fact, the PRC, or CCP, its political basis is the close alliance between Chinese left-wing Communists and right-wing nationalists, this cannot be done in other countries.
Chinese left-wing Communists are deeply influenced by Confucian culture and do not reject nationalism, and China's right-wing nationalists tried all the ways in the exploration of anti imperialism and rejuvenating Chinese civilization, and finally chose communism.
The close alliance between the two is the basis for CCP to maintain political stability and the stable development of China's economy. Even when China is hostile to the two superpowers of USA and USSR at the same time and there is a great famine in China, the alliance has never wavered.
The strange alliance between Communists and nationalists is also the reason why CCP gave birth to the theory of socialism with Chinese characteristics. This is why the CCP is so different from the Communist Party of other countries.
The CCP is not interested in export values to other countries because we know that it is impossible to copy China's political foundation in other countries. Now the formation of Chinese society has been influenced by too much history

would you say a similar mindset exists in many East Asian countries, and the likes of South East Asian countries like Singapore? Like John Nash’s Nobel prize winning Game theory; best for one’s self and that of the group leads the the optimal outcome. East Asian culture, perhaps are more collectively oriented then Europeans like the Russian people, so East Asian peoples are more willing to accept the sacrifices to personal liberties?

Also, China would be smart to be in a competition to attract and retrain the top talent of the world, not just ethnic Chinese. Facilitating their creativity is paramount to winning the technological race.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom